Rosetta Question

Discussion in 'macOS' started by Benjamindaines, Jun 4, 2006.

  1. Benjamindaines macrumors 68030

    Benjamindaines

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Location:
    A religiously oppressed state
    #1
    I will probably be buying an Intel PowerMac when they come out and am not really looking forward to forking out tons of money to the cent vacuum we all affectionately know as Adobe for CS3 (Intel Native). So do you think Apple will provide updates to it's Rosetta technology (most likely in a OS update) that would make the Rosetta environment faster? Ultimately I would like it to get fast enough that I don't need to buy CS3.
     
  2. netdog macrumors 603

    netdog

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #2
    There have been some updates to Rosetta to increase the speed. Hopefully there will be more!
     
  3. dpaanlka macrumors 601

    dpaanlka

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2004
    Location:
    Illinois
    #3
    Well if history is any indicator, Apple isn't very good with emulation speeds. Look how aweful 68k emulation was on PowerPC Macs. In fact, a third party company made it's own version of 68k emulation for PowerPC Macs which became one of the most popular system add-ons ever, Connectix SpeedDoubler 8. Perhaps something like that will be released for PowerPC on Intel emulation. It's a shame Connectix doesn't exist anymore.
     
  4. netdog macrumors 603

    netdog

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #4
    I think the speed of Rosetta is incredibly impressive. Sure, you CAN bog it down with heavy pro apps like CS2, but for the most part, it runs so well that most of us forget it is even running (unless we are short on RAM). It is fantastic emulation.
     
  5. gekko513 macrumors 603

    gekko513

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2003
    #5
    Rosetta is already quite speedy, but only with enough RAM. The real question is what you consider fast enough. CS2 on an Intel Mac with 2GB of RAM is already faster than on most G4 Macs.
     
  6. Chaszmyr macrumors 601

    Chaszmyr

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    #6
    And if history is any indicator, Apple's new Mac Pro will be beige.
     
  7. Benjamindaines thread starter macrumors 68030

    Benjamindaines

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Location:
    A religiously oppressed state
    #7
    Well Im hoping for at the very least CS1 (on a dual 2GHz G5) speeds.
     
  8. Makosuke macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2001
    Location:
    The Cool Part of CA, USA
    #8
    Probably not for a while at least. Maybe Woodcrest (if it makes it into Mac Pros) will pack enough punch, but I wouldn't count on that kind of speed for a while yet.

    And I find it hard to believe that people are actually complaining about Rosetta's speed; have you tried running an x86 app on a PPC processor in VPC recently? You're incredibly lucky if you get 1/10 the speed of a native app out of it. Same goes for all previous PPC emulation on x86 that I'm aware of. The fact that Rosetta can run apps written and compiled for a completely different architecture at a signficant fraction of native speed (as said, enough that most people don't even notice it's running) is, in computing terms, something of a miracle.

    And if you have some sort of belief that Apple doesn't like emulation, remember that they didn't even write Rosetta--they bought another company that had come up with an amazingly fast cross-architecture emulation system.
     
  9. dpaanlka macrumors 601

    dpaanlka

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2004
    Location:
    Illinois
    #9
    A beige G3 looks better than any beige PC I've ever seen.
     
  10. 7on macrumors 601

    7on

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2003
    Location:
    Dress Rosa
    #10
    CS1 on my Macbook runs a little faster than on my Powerbook 1Ghz. Except for Indesign mysteriously... But it's all usable.
     

Share This Page