iPod Classic and Shuffle, can't edit title...
http://www.cnn.com/2011/09/28/tech/mobile/ipod-discontinued-rumor/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
http://www.cnn.com/2011/09/28/tech/mobile/ipod-discontinued-rumor/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
makes sense if you think about it.
classic has no:
flash storage
touchscreen functionality
shuffle has no:
screen
touchscreen functionality
since the new nano is small as the shuffle, and the touch's are reaching the capacity of the classic's. Why keep them on at all?
shuffle has no:
screen
touchscreen functionality
This is exactly why I would like to see one of them (preferably the shuffle) remain --- no touchscreen. If you use your iPod in the car, you need to be able to navigate it by "feel" --- skip ahead, stop/pause it, start it, etc. It is very hard to do this on the Touch and almost impossible on the current/new Nano. When exercising (especially running) being able to switch around by "feel" only is nice as well.
I think something "physical" for music storage up to 16GB would fill the gap nicely --- as would two models of Nano: one with the current Touch screen and one with the traditional Shuffle-like wheel. I think by completely rejecting any kind of physical interface, Apple may be opening the door for some other player to step in.
I don't care for the Shuffle, as that one has tons of alternatives from other manufacturers, but the Classic? ******* you Apple. I have 19000 songs on mine, docked it serves as a base of my home stereo, I can take it with me anywhere I travel, I can carry it in my jacket... I don't care for anything but music, and there are no alternatives in this capacity. I hope some other company fills this gap as I will never buy an Apple product again if they do this.
Nice find. Sad to see centipede go.Apple removes click-wheel games from iTunes as iPod classic lives its last days
http://www.appleinsider.com/article...re.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Why not keep the classic you already have? If all you care about is music than it should suffice.
Nice find. Sad to see centipede go.
Why not keep the classic you already have? If all you care about is music than it should suffice.
They can however, kill that worthless iPod nano 6th gen and revert it to the old nano style.
Classic = Don't care
Shuffle is important for many workout people, I hope it isn't discontinued
This is exactly why I would like to see one of them (preferably the shuffle) remain --- no touchscreen. If you use your iPod in the car, you need to be able to navigate it by "feel" --- skip ahead, stop/pause it, start it, etc. It is very hard to do this on the Touch and almost impossible on the current/new Nano. When exercising (especially running) being able to switch around by "feel" only is nice as well.
I think something "physical" for music storage up to 16GB would fill the gap nicely --- as would two models of Nano: one with the current Touch screen and one with the traditional Shuffle-like wheel. I think by completely rejecting any kind of physical interface, Apple may be opening the door for some other player to step in.
If the HD dies you can just replace it. Some people have even replaced theirs with SSD's I think.Because when it dies, we will be out of luck. If it is discontinued, you can't just go out and buy another. I'm actually thinking of picking up another one just to have when my current model dies. The HD is already making some odd noises.
I reckon if they drop the classic their will be a 128gb ipod touch so you may not be out of luck.Because it can die anytime, as any other device can. I'm not worried about my current iPod, I'm woried about the fact that if it dies, there is NO suitable replacement product anwhere in the world (which seems completely ridiculous to me in this day when millions of crap devices that nobody wants are being produced).
If the HD dies you can just replace it. Some people have even replaced theirs with SSD's I think.
I reckon if they drop the classic their will be a 128gb ipod touch so you may not be out of luck.