Scientists Create Living/Reproducing Synthetic Cell

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by RawBert, May 20, 2010.

  1. RawBert
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    RawBert

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Location:
    North Hollywood, CA
    #1
    Link

    Scientist today created a synthetic cell that actually reproduces. A living cell! :eek:
    [​IMG]
     
  2. citizenzen
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #2
    Those nutty scientists... they're always coming up with something.
     
  3. pukifloyd
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    pukifloyd

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2008
    Location:
    Phoenix
    #3
    Thats pretty cool...a living and reproducing cell:eek:
     
  4. Dagless
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors Core

    Dagless

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Location:
    Darkplace Hospital
    #4
    This is both awesome and scary, like all good science.
     
  5. GroundLoop
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    GroundLoop

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2003
    #5
    Can you say "ridiculously powerful biological weapons"?

    Hickman
     
  6. Dagless
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors Core

    Dagless

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Location:
    Darkplace Hospital
    #6
    From the BBC website-
    This has to happen.
     
  7. mags631
    Expand Collapse
    Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    #7
    How is this materially different from mucking about with the DNA of a non-synthetic cell?
     
  8. Schtumple
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 601

    Schtumple

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    Location:
    benkadams.com
    #8
    God I hope people actually move forward with this, this should not be used for weapons and should be used only for the purpose of enhancing life, not killing it off.

    Aren't biological weapons banned internationally anyway?...
     
  9. roadbloc
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors G3

    roadbloc

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    UK
  10. abijnk
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68040

    abijnk

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #10
    I'm sure I won't explain this well, but it is different because before what people were doing was manipulating the existing DNA sequence in a cell to get it to turn into something else. This time, they removed all genetic material from the cell, built their own genetic code (not necessarily from the stuff they removed) and put this new, previously nonexistent sequence back into the cell and got it to reproduce.
     
  11. danielcox
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    #11
    Essentially what they did was get a bacterium (I forget the species) and build up entirely synthetic DNA using a computer and then insert it into the host bacterium.
    Although this DNA is created and not modified it is nearly exactly the same as the host bacterium DNA.

    I'm not particularly worried about biological weapon creation with this - aside from being illegal diseases are generally infectious or deadly and not both - think the common cold (very highly infectious) vs. Ebola.
     
  12. iShater
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 604

    iShater

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    #12
    or Cylons.
     
  13. dukebound85
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors P6

    dukebound85

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Location:
    5045 feet above sea level
  14. chrmjenkins
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    chrmjenkins

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Location:
    CA
    #14
    Great potentials for alternative fuels, curbing effects of global warming, creating organisms that eat oil from oil spills, etc. They'll need to regulate the heck out of it though.
     
  15. Cabbit
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    Cabbit

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Location:
    Scotland
    #15
    Lets make Godzilla. Or something else large and terrifying.
     
  16. chrmjenkins
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    chrmjenkins

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Location:
    CA
    #16
    One Oprah is enough.
     
  17. dmr727
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors G3

    dmr727

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    #17
    Excuse me while I go lock myself in the basement.
     
  18. Mal67
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Location:
    West Oz
    #18
    I think it's fantastic news :) I can't wait to see how this gets used 5, 10 years down the track. Environmental applications, materials science, alternative fuels, medical science..... you name it. I just hope this doesn't get regulated out of existence. Hiding down in the basement I don't think so.
     
  19. 11800506
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    11800506

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Location:
    Washington D.C. Area
  20. appleguy123
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    appleguy123

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Location:
    15 minutes in the future
    #20
    Can they regenerate aged cells and make people immortal with it? Obviously thismwould take awhile.
     
  21. danielcox
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    #21
    I doubt it - for one this is a bacterium cell and not a human cell.
    Ageing encompasses all sorts of effects not just cell death, it's a complicated issue but one I hope gets sorted before I die.
     
  22. appleguy123
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    appleguy123

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Location:
    15 minutes in the future
    #22
    What I mean is; in the future could they manufacture cells that the could retrofit into humans. Most aging occurs because of DNA's failure to copy correctly every time, right? Could these commuter generated cells be perfect DNA thAt would never fail at copying correctly?
     
  23. MattSepeta
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    MattSepeta

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Location:
    375th St. Y
    #23
    Reminded me of a quote from my favorite book... "...Being against war is like being against glaciers..." -K.Vonnegut

    Re: The breakthrough... I think it is great. I think that the positives that come about from this will far outweigh the negatives. Maybe they can implement this technology and methodology in a way that they tried to do with embryonic stem cells. This way we can get the research and the benefits without the anti-stem cell people impeding the progress?
     
  24. RawBert
    Expand Collapse
    thread starter macrumors 68000

    RawBert

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Location:
    North Hollywood, CA
    #24
    I think those same stem cell research opposers aren't so thrilled with this breakthrough. Probably for the same reasons. They think we're playing God. :rolleyes:
     
  25. Don't panic
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    Don't panic

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Location:
    having a drink at Milliways
    #25
    it's different because this way Venter makes a lot more money and can be on the first pages of all newspapers.

    this "breakthrough' doesn't introduce any ethical issue that have not been there for many many years already.
    there is obviously some technological improvement in what they achieved compared to what is already done in hundreds of labs around the world every day, but nothing earth-shattering.
     

Share This Page