This scares me, and I have no criminal record. In fact, we may as well just throw all of Miranda out, now that this has happened. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/17/supreme-court-silence_n_3453968.html http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...SILENCE?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT If silence pre-Mirandizing can be used, but silence after can not, how could one determine guilt? I really don't get this one, but the conservative justices in this one really opened a can of worms, in making any questioning prior to being Mirandized usable in court. What is now to stop the police from breaking someone down into confession for something, then Mirandizing him, and then using the evidence pre-Miranda in court? BL.