Seagate Announces First 8 TB Hard Drive for Enterprise Customers

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Aug 26, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Seagate today announced the world's first eight terabyte hard drive, designed to provide high capacity storage for private and cloud-based data centers. The single 3.5-inch hard disk drive surpasses the storage capacity of previously available hard drives, including 6 TB HDDs from both Western Digital and Seagate itself.

    [​IMG]
    Unlike similar high-capacity offerings from Western Digital, Seagate does not use helium in either its 6 TB HDD or its new 8 TB offering. While Seagate has not released the details behind the 8 TB drive, it's likely the HDD uses Seagate's shingled magnetic recording technology, which, according to the company, adds more than 25 percent capacity growth by maximizing the number of tracks per inch on a single disk.

    Seagate says that its new 8 TB HDD also uses fewer components to make it more power efficient, which ultimately lowers power costs for enterprise customers.
    Seagate is currently shipping the drives to select numbers with wide scale availability coming next quarter. The company did not release pricing on the drives.

    Article Link: Seagate Announces First 8 TB Hard Drive for Enterprise Customers
     
  2. macrumors 6502

    HangmanSwingset

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    Location:
    Everett, WA
    #2
    But... It's Seagate.
     
  3. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    #3
    I'll get my 8TB HD when they're $20 on amazon in 5 years.
     
  4. macrumors 603

    troop231

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    #4
    Delivered by a drone too! :D
     
  5. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Location:
    4/20
    #5
    The Backblaze study really hurt poor Seagate's reputation. People forget that the drives they used (and studied) were the highest capacity-to-price ratio drives that the manufacturers offered.

    It certainly made me think twice about replacing my faulty stock MBP Seagate with another Seagate. I didn't. But I really hope that Seagate can build its reputation back up. It's clearly a great innovator in the HD industry.
     
  6. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    #6
    And the drone comes free with the hard drive. :cool:
     
  7. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    #7
    Back in my day... we were downloading Mandrake Linux in 5-7 days on Dial-up!
     
  8. markyr17, Aug 26, 2014
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2014

    macrumors demi-god

    markyr17

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    #8
    Seagate Announces First 8 TB Hard Drive for Enterprise Customers

    It's kind of crazy when you think about it. When I first got my computer back in 1995, it had Windows 95 on it, and had a 4GB hard drive. The salesman at Sears told me "4GB is all you will EVER need!"



    Now, we're at 8TB hard drives. I know they aren't producing them for consumers yet, but still. Wow.
     
  9. macrumors 6502a

    PowerBook-G5

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Location:
    It's only me, PowerBook-G5.
    #9
    8TB‽ I thought that 6TB drives just recently came out (although I don't really follow hard drive news)!
     
  10. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2013
    #10
    This is cool, no doubt, but as far as storage-density-that-scares-the-willies-out-of-me-in-a-sort-of-existential-way goes, the 128 gig micro sd cards still win.
     
  11. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    #11
    Finally. I can now store my entire porn library with fewer than 10 drives.
     
  12. macrumors 6502

    larrylaffer

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2009
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #12
    What was really amusing was when I had a Mac LC II. It had an 80MB hard drive, and I later purchased a ZIP drive to accompany it. So, I had a 80MB hard drive, and 100MB floppies. :D
     
  13. macrumors 603

    ArtOfWarfare

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    #13
    Each one of these drives can hold all the data that Facebook stores on 33K of it's typical users. So they'll need 45 thousand of these hard drives right now, for their 1.5B users.
     
  14. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    #14
    If he was good at predicting the future he probably wouldn't have been working at Sears.

    ----------

    Sure... but who wants to convert it to standard def?
     
  15. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    #15
    Backblaze used Seagate consumer grade external backup drives for their data centers and pulled them out of the external case. These drives are not designed for data center applications. They used enterprise grade drives from hitachi and WD. It was a really unfair study. All the Seagate drives where also over a year out of their documented life span of 6 years.
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2003
    Location:
    Florida
    #16
    Apple ][ with tape, then with a Disk ][. Then a 5MB Trustor hard disk. (not to mention the TRS-80s with tape at school).

    "8TB should be enough for anyone" - says the guy working at Sears in August 2014. lol

    The correct answer is, that you need just about twice as much storage as the largest current drive available.
    :)


     
  17. macrumors 601

    HobeSoundDarryl

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Location:
    Hobe Sound, FL (20 miles north of Palm Beach)
    #17
    Dazzling. I recall scraping up about $700 to buy a 64MB SCSI drive for an Amiga and thinking at the time that I would never fill it up. It's just amazing that one could store so much in such a little space and that 4-bay boxes could soon hold 32TB of storage. Wow!
     
  18. macrumors 6502

    OmegaRed1723

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Location:
    The Waste
    #18
    Now the NAS manufacturers need to remove the artificial volume size limit they place on arrays. Currently, you can't have a single volume larger than 16TB on any of the name brand NAS's (Synology, QNAP, Drobo, etc.), even though any modern OS supports volumes in the exabyte range.
     
  19. macrumors 601

    HobeSoundDarryl

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Location:
    Hobe Sound, FL (20 miles north of Palm Beach)
    #19
    Ummmm I have a Synology NAS with a single 28TB volume right now… and have for about a year+.
     
  20. macrumors 68040

    Dwalls90

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
  21. macrumors 6502

    OmegaRed1723

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Location:
    The Waste
    #21
    Really? Every Synology NAS I've looked at—including their newest DS415play—lists 16TB as the max volume size in the technical documentation. If this isn't the case, then I'll have to take another look at them.
     
  22. macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Location:
    California
    #22
    Not sure where you're getting that. Just randomly poking around some of the higher end models shows 108TB limit. Not sure even that number is accurate on the highest end models (e.g. the ds3612xs - I have two of those, both with volumes bigger than 16TB).
     
  23. macrumors 68030

    Analog Kid

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    #23
    That's pretty close to right. For me it's twice as much as the last generation disk.

    My pattern has been that when my working drive fills up, I buy two of the latest gen drives and make them my Time Machine drive. I then take the Time Machine pair and promote it to be my new working drive. It's worked about right for a few generations now.
     
  24. macrumors 68040

    Gasu E.

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Location:
    Not far from Boston, MA.
    #24
    No; but he might have been working at "Seer's" instead.
     
  25. macrumors 601

    HobeSoundDarryl

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Location:
    Hobe Sound, FL (20 miles north of Palm Beach)
    #25
    Yes, if you go to a site like Amazon, search for 8 or 12-bay (or more) RAID, then sort by price high to low, you can find pre-populated RAIDs at 72GB (12 times 6TB), maybe more. They should show up as one big volume.
     

Share This Page