Senator Lindsey Graham wants Bombing Suspect Held as Enemy Combatant

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Merkava_4, Apr 21, 2013.

  1. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2010
    Location:
    USA
    #1
    The New York Times

    Senator Graham wants the kid held as an enemy combatant so that he can be questioned without a lawyer present because Graham is concerned that the kid may belong to a wider terrorist organization and that there may still be more operatives with explosives out there ready to strike. I can tell you people right now from pure common sense that the kid and his older brother had nothing to do with a terrorist organization and that the bombings were planned and carried out by them and no one else. Senator Graham must be assuming all you people are idiots. Don't let him take away your natural rights as U.S. born citizens because that's exactly what he's trying to do. Senator Graham is one of the last Bush era holdouts that should be tried for High Treason in my opinion. :mad:
     
  2. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2012
    #2
    And if there is another group and they set off a bomb and hurt someone you love....you will think differently. If they don't do EVERYTHING they can to get every bit of info out of this jackass, and another attack happens, then people will be screaming for the heads of the people that didn't get the info out of the guy.



    And.....This isn't a KID. He is an adult. Quit calling him a kid to get sympathy for a terrorist. Who should be charged with treason?
     
  3. macrumors 601

    Tilpots

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Location:
    Carolina Beach, NC
  4. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    #4
    I don't think they were US born citizens either.
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2012
    #5
    No they weren't
     
  6. macrumors 603

    Technarchy

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    #6
    For some reason, I am greatly amused by the combining of these two sentences.
     
  7. thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2010
    Location:
    USA
    #7
    Did I misspell something? :confused:
     
  8. macrumors G3

    Renzatic

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Location:
    It's Never A Good Night To Have A Curse
    #8
    They weren't born here, but they're still naturalized citizens. They have every reason to temporarily suspend his Miranda Rights for public safety, but no more. Beyond that, he should get his due process.
     
  9. macrumors P6

    Peace

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
    #9
    The younger brother is a naturalized citizen. The older brother was using his green card and was denied citizenship because of some domestic problems that held up his citizenship.

    Which can lead to the real reason behind the bombing. IMHO

    ymmv

    As for Senator Graham. He should stick to being a bad senator instead of a DOJ employee.
     
  10. macrumors 68000

    hulugu

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    the faraway towns
    #10
    Here's the thing. That's why victims of crimes aren't in charge of the case or its prosecution. We have a rule of law and allowing victims to make those decisions is a step toward blood feuds and anarchy.

    The DoJ should dispassionately work through the law and in this case, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is a criminal, not an enemy combatant.

    Treason has specific legal requirements and they're hard to make. In this case, the DoJ has a slam dunk case, why muddy the waters with a difficult to make treason charge, or for that matter, a trip to Guantanamo to be tried by the military.

    Dzhokhar Tsarnaev isn't an Al-Qaeda operative with knowledge of the group's future plans or the location of Osama Bin Laden, he's a criminal. Try him and fry him.

    Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is a naturalized US citizen, his brother had a green card and was in the process of getting his citizenship. However, this doesn't matter since Constitutional protections are due to people in the United States regardless of their citizenship status.

    Much noise has been made of the FBI's refusal to mirandize Dzhokhar. The requirement to read Miranda rights to an arrestee has been mitigated by a two-year old move by the White House, allowing the FBI (and presumably other agencies) to question a suspect without reading these rights.

    Keep in mind, you can just stay quiet except for endlessly repeating your lawyer's phone number. But, the FBI is now allowed to arrest and question you without reading Miranda rights.
     
  11. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2012
    #11
    The treason comment was directed at another comment where it was said:


     
  12. macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #12
    We wouldn't even be having this discussion if the bomber was a right wing Christian extremist. But because the guy is Muslim, suddenly we have to throw him in Gitmo and take away his constitutional rights.
     
  13. macrumors 603

    quagmire

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    #13
    If what I read about the public safety clause is right, the things he reveals won't be admissible in court. They will read him his miranda rights eventually in order to try him.
     
  14. Huntn, Apr 22, 2013
    Last edited: Apr 22, 2013

    macrumors G3

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #14
    Looking at the definition of treason (below) as "harming the parent nation", it could be argued that the W Administration is guilty of something punishable such as fabricating a reason to go to war, resulting in tens of thousands dead, but treason implies that the actions are willful to cause harm, not based on ineptitude and general malfeasance directed outward.

    You mean when emotion clouds your better judgement... Don't be so willing to piss the other guy's civil rights away, as it could be your rights too that evaporate. IMO Senator Graham is a disgrace of a senator and an idiot, one of several reasons our governing body is currently a disaster.

    As far as treason, if you look at all the charges being leveled at them, my impression is that would be just more icing on the cake, but that might be a justified charge. I found this description at Wiki:

    source.

    Terrorist acts do harm the nation.
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    Mac'nCheese

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    #15
    Yes some would.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_McVeigh

    People screamed for his blood too. Couldn't send him to Gitmo because this was pre-9/11.
     
  16. macrumors 601

    Don't panic

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Location:
    having a drink at Milliways
    #16
    there are no differences under the law between 'natural born' citizen and naturalized citizens, except as a qualification for being elected president.
    nor there should be.
     
  17. macrumors 68000

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #17
    It is a slippery slope if the US government decides to treat the alleged bomber as an enemy combatant who does not deserve constitutional rights. Given that terrorism is meant to chip away at our moral values, everything done to he alleged bomber should be strictly according to the Constitution.

    In this regard it appears that the courts both established Miranda rights and then curtailed them under conditions of public safety. Now we're left with controversy about what is appropriate. Maybe it is time that elected officials actually propose a Constitutional amendment that clarifies things in this regard.
     
  18. macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #18
    This is pretty damn ridiculous...

    I hope the Judge has the balls to throw the case out of court - that would be hilarious.
     
  19. macrumors 603

    thekev

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    #19
    It's possible to perform such an investigation without classifying him as a combatant.


    There's probably more to that quote, but I would be surprised if the unabridged version was any less disturbing.
     
  20. macrumors 603

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
    #20
    If you were talking only about the younger brother, I might buy into this line of thinking - but it looks like the older brother had recently spent six months back in Russia, and his YouTube channel was apparently full of a bunch of anti-U.S. hatemongering. I have a hunch the older brother may have persuaded the younger brother to help him with the attacks, and I'm not ready to accept that there were no ties whatsoever to any terrorist organizations.
     
  21. macrumors 68000

    hulugu

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    the faraway towns
    #21
    Sure, but the link is probably tenuous at best. Many of the recent attempts to attack the United States have come from men operating alone with little material support.

    Faisal Shahzad spent a few weeks in Peshawar before returning to the United States and trying to set off a bomb in the United States; Nidal Hasan never traveled anywhere, instead he tried to communicate with Anwar al-Awlaki (who was also connected to Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, who may have trained with Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (though al-Awlaki denied this connection).

    ----------

    That's a good clarification.
     
  22. macrumors 6502

    lannister80

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    #22
    Still trying to find a a real, legitimate reason that they charged the bomber at the Federal level.

    Interstate commerce is SUCH a stretch...
     
  23. macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #23
    Is terrorism not a federal crime?
     
  24. macrumors 6502

    lannister80

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    #24
    Yes it is, but most things that are illegal at the State level are also illegal at the Federal level.

    So how do you decide what to jurisdiction (city/county/state/fed) to charge someone under? Honest question.
     
  25. macrumors P6

    Peace

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
    #25
    This is now a useless thread. The guy was charged and will be tried in a Federal Court. If he lives that long.
    So Mr. Graham can now go back to complaining about Obama.
     

Share This Page