Senator Sends Letter to Tim Cook Over Touch ID Privacy Concerns

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Sep 20, 2013.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    Senator Al Franken (D-MN) has sent a letter to Apple CEO Tim Cook expressing concern over the new Touch ID fingerprint sensor built into the iPhone 5s, which went on sale earlier today.

    In the letter (PDF), the Senator, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law, says he is an iPhone owner and is concerned about the use of fingerprints to unlock the device.
    Franken goes on to ask twelve separate questions of Cook, including:

    - If it's possible to convert locally-stored fingerprint data into a format that can be used by third parties.

    - If it's possible to extract and obtain fingerprint data from an iPhone 5s either remotely or with physical access to the device.

    - What diagnostic information the iPhone 5s sends to Apple about the Touch ID system.

    - Whether Apple considers fingerprint data to be the "subscriber information" or "electronic communication transactional records", the "contents" of communications, customer or subscriber records, or a "subscriber number or identity" as defined in the Stored Communications Act, or a "tangible thing" as defined in the USA PATRIOT Act.

    The last group of questions relates to when and if Apple could be required to disclose fingerprint information to U.S. Government law enforcement agencies.

    Apple, for its part, has posted an extensive knowledge base article about the security benefits of the Touch ID system, though it only discloses broad details about how the iPhone 5s stores fingerprint data, but nevertheless, it may answer some of the questions that Senator Franken asked:
    Senator Franken gave Tim Cook and Apple thirty days to answer the questions and, though it is not a subpoena and Apple is not required to respond, the company is likely to cooperate.

    This is not the first time that Senator Franken has interacted with Apple -- in 2011, he asked both Apple and Google to require clear privacy policies for apps sold on their app stores. He also introduced a bill to help protect customer location data.

    Article Link: Senator Sends Letter to Tim Cook Over Touch ID Privacy Concerns
     
  2. macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #2
    But it's ok, it's Apple. If this was Google collecting this information, you guys would be up in arms.
     
  3. macrumors regular

    MacIke

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2003
    Location:
    The Frigid Wasteland of MN
    #3
    Nsa

    I am far more concerned about the NSA and the issue of spying then I am of some company. A company has to actually respond to the customer. Whereas the government does not give a rats ass.
     
  4. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    #4
    My 24 Hour Fitness converted to fingerprint scanning after a 10-digit keypad input which they tell you should be your phone number...sounds like a conspiracy. Tracking your workout is great. Punishment for missing leg day isn't.
     
  5. macrumors 6502a

    Superdrive

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Location:
    Dallas, Tx
    #5
    What he really meant: "What are you collecting and how can we get our hands on it?"
     
  6. k1121j, Sep 20, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2013

    macrumors 6502a

    k1121j

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    #6
    Give me a break

    Does this guy want to look good or something. If i am not mistaken this is not the first consumer product with fingerprint technology ( example all those laptops out there come to mind) and as far as i can tell Apple has gone further to secure your identity where there device. SOOO get off there back and be logical you silly senator
     
  7. macrumors 6502

    DesterWallaboo

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2003
    Location:
    Western USA
    #7
    There are legitimate concerns raised in this letter to Apple I hadn't considered. The possibility that your fingerprint information might simply be available to federal law enforcement under the Patriot Act is rather chilling. I'd like to know the answer to that question before I buy my next iPhone.
     
  8. macrumors 6502a

    Starflyer

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
  9. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    May 20, 2011
    Location:
    Earth
    #9
    The government would love this data. Imagine every citizen having their fingerprint added to the database?

    Granted not everyone owns an Apple device, but when other devices start implementing this, it'll be in the homes all across America and beyond.

    I'd like Touch ID to open my car door and house.
     
  10. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    #10
    "Concerns" or..."hey we could use this..."

    Yeah, go ahead and call me a tin-foil hat type. It shows that you really can't think for yourself.
     
  11. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    #11
    yea rite

    now they are concerned about privacy? what about PRISM data?
     
  12. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    #12
    If it is "Me, Al Fraken." You can be sure it is self serving. IMO, this whole Touch ID introduction will make or break the whole mass-market bio-metric business.
     
  13. macrumors G3

    roadbloc

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    #13
    Turn it off. Or get a 5C. Or another phone. Its all off to the NSA either way.
     
  14. macrumors 6502a

    croooow

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    #14
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Yeah, lets take this guy seriously...
     
  15. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 22, 2005
    Location:
    Amsterdam
    #15

    Google has a blatant disregard for privacy, so I would delete the 'if' from the Google sentence.
     
  16. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 13, 2011
    #16
    I'm pretty sure that if you have physical access to a touchscreen device, there are ways to get the owner's fingerprint data—even if the device lacks a fingerprint scanner.
     
  17. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    #17
    Meanwhile, hardly anyone has said a thing about Google's face unlock feature which has been out on Android for some time now.
     
  18. macrumors 6502

    DesterWallaboo

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2003
    Location:
    Western USA
    #18
    Not true.
     
  19. macrumors regular

    HiVolt

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    #19
    PC laptops have had fingerprint sensors for years... Why isn't he writing Lenovo, Dell, HP?

    This guy is just "concerned" to get his name in the news with a big name company like Apple and the new phone release, makes it look like he cares for his people...
     
  20. macrumors 6502

    ck2875

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Location:
    Brighton
    #20
    So Apple has to worry about their competitor's cheap/poorly executed attempts at copying their technology?
     
  21. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2012
    #21
    Touch ID

    Apple should include on their next macbook pro with retina the touch ID sensor on the power key or touchpad.

    :apple:
    I should be the next S Jobs
     
  22. macrumors 6502a

    Smith288

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    #22
    Perhaps Al should have read any number of Apple blogs detailing the workings of the fingerprint technology?

    I can't believe this guy got into congress...
     
  23. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    #23
    Aw, c'mon. His "Mobile Uplink" schtick was pretty funny.
     
  24. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    #24
    From what Apple says, even if the Government asked for it, it would be impossible for Apple to get that information. It is stored in a part of the chip that has no communication to Apple servers, or any other servers for the matter.

    This is what I understood at least.
     
  25. macrumors 65816

    notabadname

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    #25
    Well, since Apple has made clear it is not collecting the data, and it resides only on the phone's chipset, your point is sort of irrelevant.
     

Share This Page