September 3, 2005, HP Explains Why It Dropped the iPod

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Sep 3, 2006.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
  2. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Location:
    The Amalgamated States of Central North America
  3. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    #3
    What most people don't realize is that these weren't just rebranded Apple iPods. There's more to the whole HP thing than most people realize.
     
  4. macrumors 6502a

    SuperSnake2012

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Location:
    NY/PA
    #4
    I actually saw someone who had an HP iPod a month ago... the first one I saw in the wild :p
     
  5. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Location:
    The Amalgamated States of Central North America
    #5
    I have a friend who had one, it seemed exactly the same except for the logo. The only problem was that she had to go through HP for technical support which wasn't nearly as good as Apple's.
     
  6. macrumors regular

    montex

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2002
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    #6
    I saw an HP iPod on sale a Fred Myers a year or so ago. I felt dirty just looking at it. Glad HP isn't tarnishing iPods anymore.
     
  7. macrumors 68000

    steve_hill4

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Location:
    NG9, England
    #7
    That was one of the few minor differences between the iPod and the "hPod", the others were Windows only software discs and the promotion of printable tattoos. When they ditched the HP iPod, they also stopped pre-installing iTunes onto their machines.

    Out of interest, I wonder how many HP eventually sold.
     
  8. macrumors 68000

    Porco

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    #8
    Whether intended or not, I think HP iPods and the iTunes mobile (cell)phones are great things for Apple to point to in the event of any kind of legal monopoly defence in the future - it shows Apple are willing to license and co-operate with other companies with their digital media business as long as the terms suit Apple. Of course a cynical person might suggest that's one of the only reasons they actually bothered doing it in the first place...
     
  9. macrumors 68000

    technicolor

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2005
    Location:
    ><><><><
    #9
    Care to explain?
     
  10. Moderator emeritus

    mkrishnan

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Location:
    Grand Rapids, MI, USA
    #10
    I'd like to hear it too. :eek:

    There were more business intentions... True. And this involved prominent placement of iTunes on HPs. True. But by the time HP decided to get out... it was a win-win, essentially. Apple didn't really need HP to help it's market position and it was convenient that HP had little luck selling rebranded iPods....
     
  11. macrumors 68040

    mduser63

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2004
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #11
    So in what way were they different? Everything I've seen says that the hardware was identical, the only difference physically was the addition of an HP logo to the back. There may have been some modification in initial setup to make things easier for Windows users (already formatted in FAT32, maybe?) but hardware wise they were the same.
     
  12. macrumors 68000

    SilvorX

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Location:
    'Toba, Canada
    #12
    The Zellers chain (owned by Hudson Bay Company) here in Canada still sells the HP branded iPod (shuffle) in their catalogs, and the prices are more than than the current Apple-branded-shuffle prices I believe
     

Share This Page