Dubya's last term is possibly the biggest reason myself or anyone would support shortening a president's term to 2 years. Anything can happen in 4 years, and we're stuck. In 2004, Bush (barely) won. 2 years later, no one in this country can stand him, and if the midterms were any indication of what Americans think of him, then it's obvious we want him out...but we're stuck. Obviously, I know my opinion on this is meaningless, but it might be good discussion. I think a president's term should be 2 years, with a 4 term limit, still allowing one to serve 8 years. And if they do a good job, the people like them and choose to re-elect them, then they can still serve those 8 years, but if they completely fail at their job as president, then we can get them out quicker, before they have a chance to f*ck up the country even more. Of course, the only bad thing is, it would be constant, nonstop campaigning and I know most of us get sick of the mudslinging that goes on between 2 candidates. Thoughts?