Split rulings on Ten Commandments displays

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by xli_ne, Jun 27, 2005.

  1. xli_ne macrumors 6502a

    xli_ne

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Location:
    Center of the Nation
    #1
    Link

    I personally don't agree since its been like this for years and years and now people seem it should change, but whatsever :rolleyes:
     
  2. iGary Guest

    iGary

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Location:
    Randy's House
    #2
    The Supreme Court doesn't want to get involved...period.

    Tinderbox.
     
  3. rainman::|:| macrumors 603

    rainman::|:|

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2002
    Location:
    iowa
    #3
    being as only two of the 10 commandments have any similarity to our current law, it seems wholly inappropriate even in a historical sense. Perhaps eventually they'll print the commandments inside a contact lens, so zealots can stare at them all day long. Meanwhile, the rest of the world is busy trying to make progress, thanks.
     
  4. FriarTuck macrumors 6502

    FriarTuck

    Joined:
    May 26, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago area
    #4
    There are a lot of us "zealots" who are unhappy with the abuse of the 10 Commandments as political symbolism. But that doesn't mean it was the court's decision to make, and it doesn't make your suggestion that only two of the 10 commandments "have any similarity to our current law" plausible.

    Nonetheless, I'm curious to know which two you think still "have any similarity to our current law" as I would like to know which of these three you have left out: perjury, murder, or theft? And adultery is still a crime in some Western nations and is a court-martiable offense in the US Military.
     
  5. stridey macrumors 65816

    stridey

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Location:
    Massachusetts, Connecticut
    #5
    At first I read this thread's subject as being about 10 different commandment displays. Ooh, I said, what's a commandment display? Some sort of super LCD? Sounds shiny! :p
     
  6. mpw Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    #6
    Has the US still got "In God we trust" on their currency notes?

    When's the vote to have that removed?
     
  7. stridey macrumors 65816

    stridey

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Location:
    Massachusetts, Connecticut
    #7
    The theory is that "In God we trust" refers to a sort of general God not specifically associated with Christianity in particular. Yeah... right. The reason the 10 commandments are different is that they reference a specific religion (or pair of religions).
     
  8. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #8
    But the building this ruling comes out of most likely has that type of writing/art carved into it all over the place. :p

    The ten commandments are all over DC in the form of I, II, III, ... IX, X on the pages of tablets.
     
  9. jared_kipe macrumors 68030

    jared_kipe

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Location:
    Seattle
    #9
    Personally I don't think it should be there, but I heard that they voted for it's removal. Weird.
     
  10. mpw Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    #10
    That would be even worse, a society whose government chooses to believe in bits of various religions only as accepted by all so as not to offend anyone. Except of course that offends the logical atheists among us so they pretend they don't and say there's no link between Church and State.
     
  11. CorvusCamenarum macrumors 65816

    CorvusCamenarum

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    Location:
    Birmingham, AL
    #11
    I had to go back and actually read the 10 Commandments before I could say anything intelligent, but more than two have found their way into civil law. For the record, I'm going on the laws of my home state, which sadly happens to be Alabama:

    Murder: This is a big no-no anywhere.
    Theft: A similar but lesser no-no.
    False Witness: Another lesser no-no (also known as perjury)
    Adultery: Might vary in other states, but in Alabama, adultery is still a crime, even though it's just a misdemeanor.
    Sabbath Day: Again, it varies in other states, but in some places here, we have what are known as blue laws. Cullman County, AL is a good example, where on Sundays, businesses and the like must remain closed, with the exceptions of police and fire, hospitals, gas stations, and any other community essentials.

    That's five out of ten right there. I could probably make some extended arguments for a couple others, but that would be reaching.
     
  12. ChrisBrightwell macrumors 68020

    ChrisBrightwell

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    #12
    You disagree w/ the higher courts saying, "We know you've been doing this for years w/ no problems ... but you can't do it anymore."?

    Blacks are free and women can vote. Do you have problems there, too?
     
  13. hulugu macrumors 68000

    hulugu

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    the faraway towns
    #13
    So, that's half of the entire document. The Ten Commandments isn't the only place from which our moral and legal codes stems and thus is about as important as the Code of Hammurabi. The problem is the inherent religious application of the other five commandments—and I would say the Sabbath day is just a secular application of a religious tenet.
    Furthermore, the additions of "In God We Trust" as well as the "...under God indivisable.." part of the Plege of Allegiance were both added after the fact. The line "In God We Trust" was added to coinage in 1865 by an act of congress. The Pledge of Allegiance was changed in 1954 by a campaign of the Knights of Columbus.
    None of these things were considered to be a part of the republic under the Constitutional Congress and thus I think the original strictures of separation of church and state was meant by our founding fathers.
     
  14. ChrisBrightwell macrumors 68020

    ChrisBrightwell

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    #14
    Your arrogance is astounding.
     
  15. ChrisBrightwell macrumors 68020

    ChrisBrightwell

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Location:
    Huntsville, AL
    #15
    FINALLY. Someone said it.

    I've been all for a monument portraying these commandments as the historical and philosophical foundation of our current system of laws -- but only if it's displayed alongside the Koran, Hammurabi's Code, and half a dozen other equally significant documents.
     
  16. stridey macrumors 65816

    stridey

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Location:
    Massachusetts, Connecticut
    #16
    I don't see how it's arrogance. God (with a capital G) specifically denotes the deity of a monotheistic religion, but the theory that defends the use of the word "God" on the US currency is that it denotes an abstract belief in "something." My "yeah.. right" was simply to say that I think that's false. I believe the use of "God" on the bills is in fact an inherently Christian statement.

    Your shortsightedness is astounding. Try relaxing a bit. :D
     
  17. hulugu macrumors 68000

    hulugu

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    the faraway towns
    #17
    Not only those, but the Magna Carta, the writings of Aristole, Plato, Kant, and the formal systems of the Roman Republic. I think the reason everyone likes the Ten Commandments is because it's a simple, easily digestable document. But, what would be more important—in the sense of a Christian document—would be the Sermon on the Mount. And, now we have created a display so massive that it could only be kept in a museum and maybe doesn't fit so well in a state courthouse.
     
  18. rainman::|:| macrumors 603

    rainman::|:|

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2002
    Location:
    iowa
    #18
    okay, i wasn't considering "bearing false witness", because i always thought that was more about lying in general, which itself is not illegal. But we'll go literal and give it to you, that's 3. Adultery laws are unconstitutional, and have not successfully been used for decades-- every time one is invoked, it's tossed out, leaving a handful of southern states proudly waving a dead moral law. And sunday laws are on a city-by-city basis... not even laws, ordinances. There are no laws prohibiting work on Sundays (thankfully, as the world would cease to function), and although there are laws prohibiting certain activities on Sundays (these are mostly being tossed out or unwritten, but some are withstanding challenges), none of these laws mention "keeping the sabbath holy" as a reason-- In fact, none give a motive. Nor does the Bible suggest these methods as ways TO keep the sabbath holy.

    So without taking out the two personal-liberty ones that would be there regardless (not killing and stealing are certainly concepts that predate Christianity... So it's difficult to say we got those from the commandments) you've got 3, less than a third of the documents. I agree with the above, that makes it about as relevent as the Code of Hammurabi.
     
  19. Azadre macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2005
    Location:
    USA
    #19
    God implies the god of the Abrahamic faiths. The term god, however, implies just a general greater being.
     
  20. hulugu macrumors 68000

    hulugu

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    the faraway towns
    #20
    ummmm...sacrilegious

    So you mean, during intercourse if you say oh god, oh god you're not saying oh Yahew, oh Yahweh, but rather oh greater being, oh greater being.

    I'll agree with that.
     
  21. monkeydo_jb macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2002
    Location:
    Columbia, MO
    #21
    With nothing to believe in, you all must live hollow lives.

    Jesus loves you. No matter how you feel about him.
     
  22. hulugu macrumors 68000

    hulugu

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    the faraway towns
    #22

    Then why did he beat the crap out of me in the 8th grade? I mean Jesus Ramirez was a big dude, and I did throw a rock at his head, but that was a serious thumping.

    Seriously, no one ever said they didn't lack belief, simply that it may not belong in a secular enterprise like the US courts. Furthermore, many of our founding fathers were agnostic, their faith was tenuous and yet thoughful. They questioned man's ability to understand god and were suspect of the dogma that surrounds organized religion. Some also believed that the spiritual was sullied by its connection with the profane aspect of a court system and thus the two should be kept apart. Even Jesus was disturbed by the combination of the temple with the money-lenders.
    Lots of people manage to have powerful, meaningful spiritual beliefs without a whiff of the Ten Commandments. Like many Hindus, Buddhists, Animists, Taoists, Shintoists, etc. It's not the only moral document, even in Christianity.
     
  23. zimv20 macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    toronto
    #23
    so if one doesn't believe in jesus, one necessarily believes in nothing at all?

    and what of Nihilists?
     
  24. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #24
    I lost my faith in nihilism.
     
  25. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #25
    Jesus loves them too, just not as much.
     

Share This Page