Stay away from those radioactive trees!

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by vniow, Nov 24, 2002.

  1. macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    I accidentally my whole location.
  2. macrumors 6502a

    al256

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2001
    Location:
    Colorado
    #2
    Re: Stay away from those radioactive trees!

    So what's your commentary on it? Man, I feel like this kinda like hit and run spam. If you at least posted a comment I wouldn't say this, but how should we talk about this post. I'm not saying to this to be a jerk, but I'm just kinda asking/ saying my opinon.

    ON the article it's self, I think it's sad how much we pollute this planet.
     
  3. macrumors 603

    rainman::|:|

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2002
    Location:
    iowa
    #3
    stay tuned for The Attack of the Radioactive Mulch!
     
  4. thread starter macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    I accidentally my whole location.
    #4

    I'm just the messenger.
    If I had thought of a comment I would have put one there.
    You can make any comment you want about the article you want, I just bring it to you.

    And with that post I spam my way up one more non-existent post count.
     
  5. macrumors 65816

    Roger1

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Location:
    Michigan
    #5
    Can I assume they are going to leave the mulch in the canyon?
    Question: What is the benefit of grinding up the trees, as opposed to just leaving them? I know they won't be able to be harvested now, but how about radioactivity-wise. Won't the dust blow around now?
     
  6. Moderator emeritus

    Mr. Anderson

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2001
    Location:
    VA
    #6
    They're grinding them up because if they go up in flames the smoke and ash will effectively be fall out - not good. Now as for what they do with the mulch, well, that shouldn't just be left to sit there.

    I wonder if anyone did any studies on the trees to see if they've mutated....

    D
     
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2002
    #7
    Interestingly, radiation does not cause things to mutate, glow green or gain additional limbs (tree pun). It simply causes them to die, or grow cancer. I guess you could consider cancer a mutation, but i just consider it damage. The trees will not be gaining the genetic code of the scientists involved in the nuke tests in the 40s, thus creating an unstoppable race of superintelligent homicidal trees, bent on stopping communists. Unfortunately.
    If that happened, I bet some other scientists could remutate the trees to create an unstoppable race of superintelligent homicidal trees bent on stopping terrorists instead of communists. This would be very advantageous for the current presidential administration. Since communists came to be known as 'commies', does that mean terrorists are 'terries'? And what effect will this have on the emotional state of people named Terry? Only time, and thousands of subterranian barrels of radioactive tree mulch, will tell.
     
  8. macrumors 604

    MrMacMan

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2001
    Location:
    1 Block away from NYC.
    #8
    Oh man

    That is really sad, I mean the trees as nuclear, damn I've heard of mutated animals but never trees that give off radation.:eek:
    RUN THE TREES ARE ATTACKING!!!:D
     
  9. Moderator emeritus

    Mr. Anderson

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2001
    Location:
    VA
    #9
    That's not entirely correct. Maybe I shouldn't have used the word mutate here, but it is applicable. Studies done at Chernobyl have shown that the radiation speeds up genetic change - cancer is also a side effect - but basically it speeds evolution which is mutation.

    D
     
  10. macrumors 603

    rainman::|:|

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2002
    Location:
    iowa
    #10
    True. While mutations might not be signifigant in the directly-exposed trees, any seeds they produced would grow very messed up saplings. Have you seen pictures of the monsters that were birthed after Chernobyl? i think it's good that they're destroying these trees, but it seems like an incredible amount of time passed before they did anything... i wonder how much radiation spread into the surrounding soil through the roots... groundwater affected... much worse environmental damage than would have been done by bulldozing the area right after the tests.

    You know, when scientists set off the first atomic bomb (testing) in New Mexico, some of them feared that the reaction would continue and there would basically be a small sun forever out in the desert.

    And they tested it anyway.

    pnw
     
  11. Moderator emeritus

    Mr. Anderson

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2001
    Location:
    VA
    #11
    Its even worse than that - there was concern that the explosion would cause the atmosphere - planet wide - to burn. That would not be a good thing. I just hope that if we develop other super weapons in the future that they don't get tested on the planet....

    D
     
  12. macrumors 604

    MacBandit

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    Location:
    Springfield, OR (Home of the Simpsons)
    #12
    Yeah at the time there knowledge of the actual fission reaction was so lacking that they had no idea if it would grow, continue, or stop. For all they new all the Hydrogen in the world would go kaboom. There was enough doubt on the chances of that though that they considered it an acceptable risk.:)
     
  13. macrumors 6502a

    chmorley

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2002
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    #13
    Well, not really. Saying evolution=mutation is like saying driving=speed. Certainly, mutation is necessary for evolution, but the essential piece of evolution is selection. When new features (due to mutation) work better than old ones, change occurs. Most of the time, these new features are either disadvantageous or simply benign. Usually those animals die without getting to pass on their new traits.

    In addition, small changes seem to be better accommodated than drastic ones. Gradual change seems to produce lasting change. The type of change produced by radiation is typically drastic, disadvantageous change. As these mutated organisms don't get to pass on their genetic material most of the time, it's difficult to say this is evolution. It is variation, which helps evolution along, but it's not productive.

    As much as the X-Men would have you believe otherwise...

    Chris
     

Share This Page