Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,537
30,846



bits-applesiri-blog480-150x105.jpg
While Steve Jobs' official biographer Walter Isaacson created a stir last October with his disclosure of Jobs having "finally cracked" how to develop a revolutionary television set product, it now appears that Jobs shared even more about the product that Isaacson has so far declined to make public.

The revelation came in an interview with Brazilian television yesterday, and The Next Web highlights Isaacson's comments about holding back the information because it would have been "unfair to Apple" to share it before the company's plans were publicly known.
[Isaacson] says that he left a few things out of the book, one of those being details of "what [Steve Jobs] thought the next Apple TV should be."

He says that he left it out of the book "because Apple hadn't yet done it and I thought that, maybe, that was unfair to Apple before they produce the TV...reporting what Steve thought it should be."
Apple has been rumored to be working on a Siri-enabled television set that could be set to launch late this year or early next year. The company has reportedly been investigating components for the product, with various prototypes sitting in Jony Ive's design lab.

Article Link: Steve Jobs' Biographer Left Out Details on Vision for 'Next Apple TV'
 

macrumorsuser10

macrumors 6502
Nov 18, 2010
359
445
Didn't Isaacson have to sign an NDA or anything that prohibits him from writing about unreleased products in detail? I think that Apple would have a made that a requirement.
 

DarkWinter

macrumors member
Feb 29, 2012
68
55
Would Steve have gone into so much detail during the interviews if he did not want them to be published in the book and thought it gave the competition an advantage?

As he always stated: "Isn't it funny a ship that leaks from the top?" :)
 

ks-man

macrumors 6502a
Sep 25, 2007
742
15
Kudos to Walter Isaacson for not publishing it b/c he thought that it wasn't fair to Apple (and to Jobs). He knows how big of selling point discussing a pre-release product would be to the book yet he respected the secrecy of Apples development chain.

I'm sure a lot of authors wouldn't have been so honorable.

--Edit--
Yes, there probably was some form of NDA but I'm guessing he could have found some loopholes to get the details into the book in some form or another.
 

kyjaotkb

macrumors 6502a
Nov 20, 2009
937
883
London, UK
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

He'd better watch his back... He could well be samsung'd on his road to work any day!
 

Peace

Cancelled
Apr 1, 2005
19,546
4,556
Space The Only Frontier
Kudos to Walter Isaacson for not publishing it b/c he thought that it wasn't fair to Apple (and to Jobs). He knows how big of selling point discussing a pre-release product would be to the book yet he respected the secrecy of Apples development chain.

I'm sure a lot of authors wouldn't have been so honorable.

Well after reading the book. Well.. Part of the book. It seems like Isaacson started to really like Steve. He saw a part of him that nobody else saw. Except for Steve's family. So i'm gonna guess he did it out of respect not some NDA agreement.

And darn it. I'm 58 years old and I want to cry again..

Steve we do indeed miss you.
 

Mjmar

macrumors 65816
May 20, 2008
1,189
495
Who else is more excited about Apple's new TV endeavor than the iPad 3?
 

gugy

macrumors 68040
Jan 31, 2005
3,891
5,309
La Jolla, CA
hummm this seems a lot of BS.
Steve was very protective of his secrets and I doubt he would spill the beans like that to Isaacson.
For me Steve was just playing with his words because he knew the stir would cause once his book was out.
Steve was a master manipulator until the end.
 

nemaslov

macrumors 6502a
Jul 22, 2002
753
9
San Francisco
Didn't Isaacson have to sign an NDA or anything that prohibits him from writing about unreleased products in detail? I think that Apple would have a made that a requirement.

The book was about Steve Jobs and Not Apple per se. The only stipulation Jobs gave was to approve the book cover. Any NDA would be between Apple and Jobs and you know that never happened.
 

newagemac

macrumors 68020
Mar 31, 2010
2,091
23
Isaacson specifically said "before they product the TV..."

So didn't he basically just confirm that Apple is in fact planning to make an actual television?
 

ilovedrums

macrumors newbie
Nov 22, 2010
2
0
i still don't understand why apple would need to make it's own tv in order to implement a new tv product. why can't it be something like the current apple tv that plugs into your existing tv? it doesn't make sense that i would have to go out and buy a brand new tv just to use apple's service. what if i bought one not too long ago?
 

iBreatheApple

macrumors 68030
Sep 3, 2011
2,948
1,021
Florida
Very interesting! I'll bet that man is now receiving monetary offers to leak info from many tech sites and media outlets.
 

bag of kittens

macrumors regular
Feb 17, 2012
133
0
inside a bag
Very classy move by Isaacson. An unscrupulous writer would have likely divulged those secrets in order to ship more units of his/her book. I respect him immensely.

He did a masterful job of writing that biography and I'm glad Steve Jobs chose him.

:)
 

Battlefield Fan

macrumors 65816
Mar 9, 2008
1,063
0
Good for him. Plus I imagine this could make for an extended version of the book which I long for after completing the first book.

Steve's legacy isn't over yet...
 

DavidLeblond

macrumors 68020
Jan 6, 2004
2,323
600
Raleigh, NC
i still don't understand why apple would need to make it's own tv in order to implement a new tv product. why can't it be something like the current apple tv that plugs into your existing tv? it doesn't make sense that i would have to go out and buy a brand new tv just to use apple's service. what if i bought one not too long ago?

I know that's what *I* would prefer, but Steve said "No one wants to buy a box" didn't he?
 

dethmaShine

macrumors 68000
Apr 13, 2010
1,697
0
Into the lungs of Hell
I really wonder why Steve Jobs, a person so obsessed with success and secrecy, would tell something about the future to this guy. I just don't buy it.

Steve Jobs on so many occasions has tried so hard to keep things away from the media. Something so big, something so critical cannot be discussed to an untrustworthy biographer. I don't buy it. Sorry.
 

DavidLeblond

macrumors 68020
Jan 6, 2004
2,323
600
Raleigh, NC
I really wonder why Steve Jobs, a person so obsessed with success and secrecy, would tell something about the future to this guy. I just don't buy it.

Steve Jobs on so many occasions has tried so hard to keep things away from the media. Something so big, something so critical cannot be discussed to an untrustworthy biographer. I don't buy it. Sorry.

He trusted Isaacson though. Plus, he was dying and he knew it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.