Steve Jobs Email in E-Book Case Provides Insight Into Thinking Process

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jun 12, 2013.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    Thus far in the ongoing e-book price fixing case, Apple has maintained that it was indifferent to what business model book publishers adopted with Amazon. However, an email from Steve Jobs to Eddy Cue submitted today by the U.S. Department of Justice appeared to undermine Apple's argument, according to Fortune:
    Apple's chief counsel quickly noted that the email was never sent, and AllThingsD now reports that Jobs later sent a longer, more detailed email with his complete thoughts on the negotiations with book publishers.
    The emails provide some insight into Jobs' thought process during the negotiations. The draft and final versions of the email show that Jobs initially appeared to have strong feelings on how Amazon's pricing would have to be affected, but then according to the emails' timestamps he reconsidered his position within two hours to offer a different angle and concern about the negotiations.

    The testimony portion of the case is now in the second week, with Cue set to take the stand tomorrow.

    Article Link: Steve Jobs Email in E-Book Case Provides Insight Into Thinking Process
     
  2. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Location:
    California
    #2
    Fascinating to see this and seeing how Jobs thinks and is involved in negotiations.
     
  3. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2011
    #3
    Steve would have never let...uh n/m
     
  4. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2013
    #4
    Too bad they didn't get more serious about this. iBooks (not the laptop) are too much of a pain to use.
     
  5. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2011
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    #5
    Wonder how the government got that email :/
     
  6. macrumors 603

    appleguy123

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Location:
    15 minutes in the future
    #6
    Probably from a subpoena, which is perfectly legal.
     
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Location:
    Mesa, AZ
    #7
    NSA + Verizon (most likely)
     
  8. macrumors 6502a

    lolkthxbai

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    #8
    E-book pricing is not a threat to national security...
     
  9. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Location:
    Mesa, AZ
    #9
    It's called "a joke".
     
  10. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    #10
    Something doesn't look right in this. Unless what is be shown by allthingsD isn't what's actually shown in court or the pictures got mixed up in posting. But from their article it doesn't look like it as they elaborate on the content.

    the DOJ email has a received time stamp 1/14/2010 @ 18:23:09

    Apple claims what the DOJ submitted it was a "draft" entering into evidence the "final" email.

    Apple's email has a received time stamp of 1/14/2010 @ 18:21:39

    Why would an email that's a "draft" have a received time stamp?

    Also the time stamp of the "draft" occurs about 2 minutes AFTER than the "final". Shouldn't the "draft" have an earlier time stamp? Apple's contention is that Steve later sent a more complete email.
     
  11. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Location:
    Holland
    #11
    Spoiler alert: the case closes with a sum of money being paid. Not much will change
     
  12. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    May 30, 2007
    #12
    Unfortunately, this is the most likely outcome.

    Apple really screwed the ebook market for consumers, as well as for small retailers, many of whom went out of business.

    Even if Apple disgorges all of their ebook profits, they'll still be ahead, as they used ebooks to sell hardware.

    The bankrupt small retailers and consumers will get cold comfort.
     
  13. macrumors 6502a

    AppleMark

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Location:
    The CCTV Capital of the World
    #13
    Genius....
     

    Attached Files:

  14. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    #14
    :confused:

    The DoJ says that Apple caused an increase in the price a consumer pays and your assertion is that this forced out the smaller vendors? It didn't have anything to do with Amazon undercutting the industry rates? Oh Kay
     
  15. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2004
    Location:
    Drifting through space in a broken escape pod
    #15
    Laughable assertion. Amazon drove the small retailers out of business, not Apple. Apple just entered the market for the first time having a model that could compete with Amazon's juggernaut.

    Before Apple entered the market, there is no competition. After Apple entered the market, there is competition. For some reason the DoJ has a problem with this???
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    #16
    Prism.
     
  17. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    #17
    what is the basis for your assertion that before apple entered there was no competition and after the agency model was enforced there was competition?

    btw i dont know you can read the emails and exchanges listed and think of the word competition
     
  18. macrumors G5

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #18
    You really don't understand what this case is about, do you? If you do - maybe you can explain why, if true, the DOJ should not have a problem with collusion?

    Then you could tell me why the major publishers all immediately settled out of court.

    Things like that...
     
  19. macrumors 6502a

    mrgraff

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2010
    Location:
    Albuquerque
    #19
    I find it interesting that both the draft and final email are available. Usually when I write an email, it gets saved as a draft as I write it, but then it becomes the final email as soon as I send it. Never have I created a draft and then created a new email based on the draft, sent it and then also held on to the draft.
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    JUiCEJamie

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    #20
    Maybe from Eddy Cue? (He's not dead).
     
  21. macrumors G5

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #21
    New feature in iO7 ? ;)
     
  22. macrumors 68040

    Bubba Satori

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Location:
    B'ham
    #22
    Is there an app that explains humor?
     
  23. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2012
    #23
    Not admissible in court. Yes, the gov't spies on you. No, it isn't legal. Evidence gathered isn't admissible in court. They'd still need a warrant to gather the same evidence legally first then use it against you. Keep your conspiracy theories out of here.
     
  24. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    #24
    Might the draft have been on a server?
     
  25. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    #25
    wtf. It was a joke, but ok. What 'conspiracy theories', PRISM is a reality. Keep your orders of what to do out of there.
     

Share This Page