It's still true today. Have you actually used any other Unix based OS? OS X is the only end user friendly UNIX desktop OS.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Steve Jobs' First Public Demonstration of the Macintosh, Hidden Since 1984
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It's still true today. Have you actually used any other Unix based OS? OS X is the only end user friendly UNIX desktop OS.
CLEARLY you did not read the Isaacson Jobs bio or you wouldn't have written the above comment the way you did. Jobs was always a fan of closed, locked systems and even with the Apple I overrode Woz when it came to selling the plans vs sharing it for free w/ fellow club members. Those themes continue with Jobs until his death. The idea Jobs stood for open systems and choice is revisionist history at best. Many Apple systems were easily user upgradable, even sold that way, but only because Jobs was vetoed by others at Apple, as noted in the bio.
A remarkable video for many reasons. It shows both what Apple has been aiming for since the very beginning (and starting to realize today), as well as the beginnings of the style of presentation that we are all too familiar with now. Fantastic bit of history, there, and I'm very glad it was recovered and will be preserved in a museum (and online). I agree some of the most remarkable parts come from the questions asked by the audience.
The telegraph vs. telephone analogy explains a lot.
The telegraph vs. telephone analogy explains a lot.
I suppose a lot of it stems from the old Superbowl advert by Apple, all the breaking free ffrom the lock downs of IBM and the PC, Apple coming to the rescue.
Now Apple is way way more locked down than the IBM PC they fought against at the time.
I don't know any other company today as locked down and controlling as Apple
I think the combination of server being slammed, Adblocker in Firefox, another poster blaming flash (which may still be the case) and my own impatience are the culprits.
VideoDownloader still can't see it in order to download the FLV file though.
The mp4 linked saved the day for me.
Double-breast Jacket ( Not A Turtle Neck ) REALLY REALLY BECOMES HIM !!!!!!
What A Man. He's Got An Aura !
Yeah, flashback videos are very nostalgic and you start to think, Gee, they had this GUI in 1984! Whoa! But then I think back to my own life and realize, hey, I was playing the game Impossible Mission ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivHFP3dJAkM ) on a Commodore 64 that very same year! Listen to THAT voice and look at those graphics in color!
The following year (1985), the Commodore Amiga (later called the 1000) came out and frankly, it kicked the Mac's hind quarter back then. Up to 4096 colors for stills and 32 colors (later 64) for up to 320x480 and 16 colors up to 640x480 and you could pick your own monitor or even use a large television with a simple adapter. The Amiga had a GUI interface with mouse control like the Mac, but also had a more Unix-like than Dos-like CLI/Shell. So, back then I was a little underwhelmed by the Apple II due to the C64 and the Mac due to the Amiga. (I just ran across this video from NewTek for the VideoToaster 2.0 released in 1992 ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7O4xqRqhPY ). To think that desktop computers were capable of THAT just 8 years after the original Macintosh came out is astounding, IMO. The original Video Toaster came out for the Amiga 2000 in 1990, only 6 years later! The Mac didn't even get color until 1987 (only 3 years prior).
The video dismisses all home computers except the Apple II and the IBM PC, but Commodore sold more C64s than any other single model home computer back then. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_64 ). I still miss going to my C64 (later Amiga too) user group every month. Good memories.
The comments about Unix being "a pretty lousy operating system to put inside a workstation" and it being "really OLD technology" were funny given OSX today IS UNIX as were the ones about local area networking being a joke right now as Ethernet never really took off, but back then things looked pretty different than today.
Last edited:
It still gives me goose pimples just to watch the Macintosh demo with the music Chariots of Fire!
We are Apple! Leading the way!
What is AMAZING is Their Way of Tecknique Using Music on BackGroung !
In A Way It Excels Today's Monotonous Yawning Ad Commercials in General.
Though Machine's Spec were Minimal Compared with What We've Got Today, Bill Atkinson's Demo STILL REALLY REALLY GLITTER Today !
They were REALLY INSANELY GREAT AMAZING TEAM !!!!!!
Was there a better presenter? I mean, if you created a product you thought would change the world, is there any other person you would want to present it for you? This is the thing I really miss about Steve. His product presentations were incredible. And now that we have had several without him, you really can appreciate so much more what he did for that company.
30 years... all of us who were around back then are surely getting old. I didn't use my first Mac until Junior High in 1988, an Apple II no less. But it wasn't until 2005 I got my first Mac, and I've never looked back through the Window(s).
I REALLY want to go to that computer museum in Silicon Valley. Never been on a trip out West, but I think I'll save up.
30 years... all of us who were around back then are surely getting old. I didn't use my first Mac until Junior High in 1988, an Apple II no less. But it wasn't until 2005 I got my first Mac, and I've never looked back through the Window(s).
I REALLY want to go to that computer museum in Silicon Valley. Never been on a trip out West, but I think I'll save up.
absolutely - he says about the original Macintosh team that none of them are interested in careers - politicians are the exact opposite of this.
I think this is where collaboration and design committee are separated - poor collaboration is pretty much a committee of 'careerists'.
I think this type of failed collaboration is behind iOS7 - this is the 'shakeout' of competing careerists - post Steve Jobs.
No, You can Watch it on i-OS Device, when You Go to Original TIME Page !
http://techland.time.com/2014/01/25/steve-jobs-mac/
Engadget SUCKS !
I keep pushing for legacy support of especially software but also hardware and formats and some people claim it doesn't matter. Well this is a beautiful example of why it does matter.
The most interesting part of this video is when Steve talks about Unix. Basically he goes on to say we think Unix is lousy for a workstation but great for a multiple user environments such as servers.
I think Steve really meant to say the price of running Unix was lousy. Back in that day, Unix was something you had to pay for whatever distro it may be and it wasn't cheap.
The irony here is that Mac OSX is a unix based platform based originally on FreeBSD/NetBSD and Nextstep.
I think Steve really meant to say the price of running Unix was lousy. Back in that day, Unix was something you had to pay for whatever distro it may be and it wasn't cheap.
The irony here is that Mac OSX is a unix based platform based originally on FreeBSD/NetBSD and Nextstep.
That link plays the video, if you'd like to download it just right click and choose save video or save video as.
I love mp4
"After years of campaigning and capitalizing the old entrenched enemy's weakness, the newly crowned young king rises to the top of his claimed land and surveys his conquest. For what he won is not a new kingdom but the same people who always lived there, doing the same jobs and raising the same families. The young king meets the guild masters and the landlords controlling almost all of the commerce. Months of campaigning has turned into years of court meetings and negotiations. This young king as grown tired of the same faces his arch-enemy dealt with while sitting on the same throne. He wonders if he did make a difference and when alone at night, wonders if he became the old king he defeated." -- from the writings of Freymarc.
----------
There has been very good efforts on this. A lot if it was done by the now quite rich and retired original Mac engineers. Check out vMac on the link below.
http://minivmac.sourceforge.net/
Did he mean UNIX itself, as in with no GUI? I wouldn't want to use that.
----------
Well, nothing about UNIX makes the user interface bad. Just cheap or non-paid GUI employees building a little GUI for an OS that isn't really meant to have one. What ticks me off is that they made it worse over time by trying to make it more "user-friendly". RIP Ubuntu.
I tried Debian. It has basically a knockoff of Simple Finder.
Debian, like any Unix/Linux system, has at least a dozen entirely different desktop environments that you can choose from. I don't know what you tried, but it sure as hell wasn't one of the big desktops like KDE, Gnome or Unity that can give OS X a run for its money.
Even Andy Hertzfeld, the father of the original Mac multi finder, years ago has donated code to the Gnome project, by the way. So much for " unemployed developers that work on Linux "...
Early in my career I worked with a few senior IBM mainframe software engineers that were "beaten into submission to write Windows applications" as one manager called them. On in particular absolutely refused to use a mouse with his Windows 3.1 machine.
This guy knew every alt-key combination out there to navigate Windows and hated Macs because of the mouse requirements. I would write Win32 era apps and he'd be all over me that he couldn't navigate the dialogs or menus without a mouse. These stickler points would add weeks to project release.
The guy would be in his 60's to 70's now. If he does use a smartphone, he's probably one of the remaining hardcore Blackberry users and scoffed the iPhone the day it came out.
1990 would have been more like it - that prediction was from the early 1980s. If you count the Newton, he almost was right.
This is why Steve coined the term "Bozo parade" describing those that move into a company after an initial success and made group decisions based on concession and group-think that typically catered to the lowed common denominator of the group.
Like any entrepreneur, you have an idea, invest your time and money into it. Sell the dream and then sell the product. If the product sells well in the market, you benefit. If not, you eat it. The beat goes on.
I forgot how cheesy everything was back during the early 90's. Thanks for reminding me.
There was a huge effort and a lot of money spend on the tablet computer craze of the mid-90's that many have forgotten about. Companies like Momenta, Slate, PenWare, GRiD and Go Corp has a slew of tablet computers with greyscale LCDs running a resistive touch single point pen interface.
The most novel of that era was that of Monenta's "screen puck" interface where you would have the app over most of the screen with this puck working as a menu control system. You could flick anywhere on the screen to interact with the app.
Unfortunately, the low power semiconductor technology was not there, the units had heavy public first generation LiIon batteries and IMO, very very poor marketing. Too many where trying to come up with the best handwriting recognition code. This lead to the folly of the Newton and the unreleased by highly collectable PenMac.
Then Palm got it right a few years later. They had the day in the sun 'til the iPhone came out.