Streamed TV-spot from G5 supercomputer at Virginia Tech.

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Oct 11, 2003.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
  2. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2002
    #2
    I can't view it; its windows media

    The version of Windows Media player I have won't play the stream; how ironic.

    Can anyone else view the report on a OS X machine? What player are you using?

    JC
     
  3. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2003
    Location:
    The south, the deep south
    #3
    Re: I can't view it; its windows media

    yeah im using WMP also, I can view the stream but I get no sound.
     
  4. Moderator emeritus

    robbieduncan

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Location:
    London
    #4
    VLC. No sound with the following message:

    main: no suitable decoder module for fourcc ` ms'.
    VLC probably does not support this sound or video format.
     
  5. macrumors 601

    cb911

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    Location:
    BrisVegas, Australia
    #5
    i couldn't view it either, so i'm downloading it... if i can view it then i'll put it up somewhere so everyone else can get it. :)

    edit>> oh well. it won't play in anything... i don't know what other players to try either. guess i'll just have to watch it on my PC.
     
  6. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Location:
    Connecticut
    #6
    Required viewer

    Need to use Real Player. Check McNN for link. :)
     
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Location:
    Connecticut
  8. macrumors 6502

    walkingmac

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2003
    Location:
    Greater Cincinnati
    #8
    here is a more direct link..

    http://macnn.com/rd.php?id=12431
    I think this should do it for everyone....

    i watched half of it and shut it off cause it was p***ing me off..

    enjoy
     
  9. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    #9
  10. macrumors 6502

    walkingmac

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2003
    Location:
    Greater Cincinnati
  11. macrumors 6502a

    Genie

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Location:
    heaven
    #11
    Re: BBC Video Converted to QuickTime Movie.


    Very cool!
    Thanks for the link!

    I want to build a cluster like that!
     
  12. macrumors 68030

    irmongoose

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2001
    Location:
    Sometimes Tokyo, sometimes California
    #12
    One thing that really really pissed me off: In the whole coverage of the Virginia Tech G5 supercomputer, they only mentioned Apple once.



    irmongoose
     
  13. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Location:
    Connecticut
    #13
    G5 way more effective (cost and performance) then Dell Xeon.

    The VT supercomputer has a potential for 17.6 teraflops using 1100 G5's for $5.2M. Texas A&M is getting a 3.0 teraflops supercomputer using 300 Dell dual 3.06 GHz Xeon for $3.0M.
    http://www.computerworld.dk/usarticles.asp?Mode=1&USArticleID=4785

    Computing Performanace (CPU/teraflops): Apple 1100/17.6 = 62.5 units, Dell 300/3.0 = 100 units. Apple G5 60% more powerful.

    Cost Performance ( $/teraflop): Apple
    $5.2M/17.6 = $295,500/tf. Dell $3.0M/3.0 = $1,000,000/tf. Apple G5 is 300% more cost effective. Why is this not in the news?
     
  14. macrumors 6502a

    adamfilip

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2003
    Location:
    burlington, Ontario canada
  15. macrumors 68020

    mainstreetmark

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Location:
    Saint Augustine, FL
    #15
    Re: G5 way more effective (cost and performance) then Dell Xeon.

    37.5% more powerful?

    Apple = .0160 Tf/cpu
    Dell = .0115 Tf/cpu (based on the 3.45 Tf number)

    nevermind. 28% more powerful? [ (160-115)/160 ]
     
  16. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2003
    Location:
    Connecticut
    #16
    Re: G5 way more effective (cost and performance) then Dell Xeon.

    Quote: by mainstreetmark
    My error used 3.0 from an other article.

    This makes the CPU count per teraflop at
    300/3.45 = 87 not 100.

    However the performance is compared to Dell (the reference) hence % difference is (delta)/ref)
    Using your #'s
    Performance (160-115)/115 =39%. Apple produces 39% more than a Dell (ref) at a cost of 1/3 that of Dell's system.
     
  17. macrumors P6

    wdlove

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    #17
    Thank you walterc for the link. All the information is very impressive. What's sad is if the Dell were the winner of the above comparisons it would be all over the news. Why doesn't Apple get the same courtesy?
     
  18. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2003
    #18
    Re: G5 way more effective (cost and performance) then Dell Xeon.



    Virginia tech has publicly stated that their choice has been based on cost/performance criteria. And since they are making a good PR effort, I think people (institutions) who want to buy a supercomputer will find out these details from VT.

    r.
     

Share This Page