Superlative 'party camera'

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Sesshi, Sep 4, 2006.

  1. Sesshi macrumors G3

    Sesshi

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Location:
    One Nation Under Gordon
    #1
    I'm looking for a super-high-quality point & shooter.

    I got myself a Sony 'prosumer' camera a while back, liked it but found I never used the advanced features. I also bought a Panasonic more recently and found that it was waaaay too big for everyday use.

    So now I'm looking for:
    - Something small, the smaller the better while doing all of the stuff I've written here
    - Takes superb pictures able to be blown up fairly large
    - Allows taking of pictures in low light either with or without flash (so either IR framing or auto-gain-up display)
    - At least 3x optical zoom
    - Is largely idiot / drunk-operator proof
    - Anti-shake in both movie and still modes
    - Able to shoot movies @ 640 x 480 / 30fps up to memory capacity
    - Fast startup time
    - Does multiple shot burst mode
    - Close macro would be nice like for when I'm taking pics for eBay, etc.
    - Prefer to pay for quality than go for just value.

    What would you suggest?
     
  2. Abstract macrumors Penryn

    Abstract

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Location:
    Location Location Location
    #2
    I think you're asking for a lot. If you want an idiot-party proof camera, Olympus makes some waterproof (up to 15-16 feet now)/shockproof cameras. There are also some water-resistent (basically waterproof, but not really) and shockproof cameras for cheaper. Pentax does as well. :)

    However, your desire for a camera with IS means these cameras aren't for you, although they're very idiotproof.

    Sony, Casio, and even Fuji makes some very thin cameras, and have a nice look. However, they're not as idiot proof as the Olympus and Pentax ones, so if you spill beer on it, they might not make it.

    All the point and shoots are going to be worse than the two bigger cameras you have now under low light conditions, although the small ones will still be usable.
     
  3. Sesshi thread starter macrumors G3

    Sesshi

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Location:
    One Nation Under Gordon
    #3
    Idiot proof meaning still operable by the sozzled. I don't need waterproofing, shockproofing, etc as long as it's well built and reasonably robust.
     
  4. firestarter macrumors 603

    firestarter

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Location:
    Green and pleasant land
    #4
    One of the Fuji F10 / F11 / F30 range.

    These are small simple 6mpix point and shoot cameras, with absolutely superb CCD chips that take great pictures in very low light (up to ISO 1600). This chip makes these three cameras better than most of the others on the market.

    They don't have anti-shake, but to a great extent you don't need it as the sensitive chip means you can use a highish shutter speed in quite low light.

    I have the F10 - it's great.
     
  5. Sesshi thread starter macrumors G3

    Sesshi

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Location:
    One Nation Under Gordon
    #5
    The thing I missed most on the Sony was anti-shake. The Pana has it and the difference is major. I guess I'll have to check it out, but I'm not really looking for a new camera which doesn't have it. Or is that misguided?
     
  6. Sesshi thread starter macrumors G3

    Sesshi

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Location:
    One Nation Under Gordon
    #6
    However, the F30 review is looking pretty good. Price is reasonable too. I'm going to have to look into it.
     
  7. YS2003 macrumors 68020

    YS2003

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2004
    Location:
    Finally I have arrived.....
    #7
    I think a good camera and that do not mix well. I won't let any idiot/drunk come close to my gear.
     
  8. wingsky macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Location:
    UK
    #8
    Anti-shake/Image Stabilization is only good when you're taking photos of still objects, at long zoom. Really for low light shots and moving people (like at a party), IS isn't so good. I very recently got the Fuji F30 because it was recommended for its low light performance. So far I'm impressed!
     
  9. w_parietti22 macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2005
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    #9
  10. LethalWolfe macrumors G3

    LethalWolfe

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #10
    My gf has a Canon Digital Elph and I think it's a great "on the go" camera. It takes good pictures for its class, but more importantly it is light and small so it's very easy to slip into a pocket and take w/you.


    Lethal
     
  11. Applespider macrumors G4

    Applespider

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Location:
    looking through rose-tinted spectacles...
    #11
    Would also recommend the Fuji option.

    I have the older F10 and its lowlight shots have been pretty good although it's better to shoot manual since it uses its higher ISOs aggressively. The F30 looks to be just as good at the lowlight while allowing better control.
     
  12. dcv macrumors G3

    Joined:
    May 24, 2005
    #12
    I bought the F30 just yesterday and I consider myself an idiot with cameras :)

    This model is 6.3 MegaPixels, 3 x optical zoom and up to ISO 3200. Very easy to use for total n00bs like me, quick startup, fast to save/delete pics etc and takes video too.

    I bought mine from this shop on the Tottenham Court Road as a bundle offer with 2 x 256MB xD-Picture Cards and a leather case for £260 (their web price is £279.99). I believe the RRP for the camera alone is around £280. I bought mine in a bit of a hurry so hope that wasn't a bad deal... if I'd had more time I might have found it cheaper elsewhere but I'm not really bothered.

    This camera is a tiny bit bigger than some of the other compact cameras out there. I tried some of the Canon Ixus and Sony Cybershot models but found them fiddly and difficult to hold in comparison. This one's really comfortable to use but I guess that's just personal preference. Haven't spent a great deal of time with it yet but am very pleased with the purchase so far!
     
  13. Sesshi thread starter macrumors G3

    Sesshi

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Location:
    One Nation Under Gordon
    #13
    The review I read wasn't quite clear about the F30's display. Does it gain up in low light? The Sony's IR illuminator was a great feature. I could frame in the dark even when clutching a drink.
     
  14. Applespider macrumors G4

    Applespider

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Location:
    looking through rose-tinted spectacles...
    #14
    The F10 does. And you can click the up arrow on the controller at the back (reachable with thumb) to increase it more if you need to.
     
  15. beavo451 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    #15
    What do you mean "gain up"?
     
  16. iMacZealot macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2005
    #16
    I'd recommend the Canon SD30 --- although it's a camera only seen in Hollywood party gift bags. If you can find one --- especially in a color -- grab it! It's a great camera!

    If you can't find the Hollywood SD30, then get another Canon. I like their quality and pretty easy to operate.
     
  17. Sesshi thread starter macrumors G3

    Sesshi

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Location:
    One Nation Under Gordon
    #17
    A typical definition of gain is amplification. In terms of it's use here it's the automatic increase in image contrast which allows the photographer to see what s/he's framing in low lighting conditions. Many cameras implement it these days instead of the old Sony way of using an infrared illuminator and an infrared filter to frame shots.
     
  18. beavo451 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    #18
    I still don't understand what you are trying to say. Most current cameras use an "infrared illuminator" (appeares red or amber) to provide enough contrast in the scene for the autofocus to lock on. This shuts off before the shutter fires. The image on screen is amplified (brightened) so that the user can frame the shot. This amplification introduces noise into the picture and is also defined as ISO in a captured image. The infrared illuminator is not used to frame a photo. Digital cameras have a built in infrared filter over the sensor to block out any IR light that might have an adverse effect on the photo.
     
  19. Sesshi thread starter macrumors G3

    Sesshi

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Location:
    One Nation Under Gordon
    #19
    YOU need to be able to see what you're pointing at. Sony's Nightframing is the easiest way to describe it: It uses an infrared illuminator and filter to show you the IR version of the field of view. When you press the shutter, the flash fires and it takes a 'normal' image. So cameras these days gain up the displayed image to allow you to frame an image in low light instead of using IR filters.
     
  20. beavo451 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    #20
    That is a better description of what you want. I don't know of any current camera that does this.
     
  21. Sesshi thread starter macrumors G3

    Sesshi

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Location:
    One Nation Under Gordon
    #21
    Many do. Failing an IR illuminator this would be what I need. I'm just not absolutely sure the Fuji is one of them.
     
  22. Sesshi thread starter macrumors G3

    Sesshi

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Location:
    One Nation Under Gordon
    #22
    All righty then, going for the Fuji. Thanks for the advice everyone.
     
  23. Jay42 macrumors 65816

    Jay42

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    #23
    [​IMG]


    Canon PS700 IS


    Small, Light, IS, High quality shots. With a small camera, you're not going to get anything more than 3x optical.
     
  24. freebooter macrumors 65816

    freebooter

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Location:
    Daegu, South Korea
    #24
    [​IMG]

    The Fuji F30 is the only point and shoot camera that can do an iso 1600 shot like this.
    No noise reduction applied.

    EXIF
    Camera make: FUJIFILM
    Camera model: FinePix F30
    Date/Time: 2006:01:01 05:20:55
    Resolution: 940 x 705
    Flash used: No
    Focal length: 18.1mm
    CCD width: 2.54mm
    Exposure time: 0.014 s (1/70)
    Aperture: f/4.3
    ISO equiv.: 1600
    Whitebalance: Auto
    Metering Mode: spot
    Exposure: program (auto)
     

Share This Page