Originally Posted by Lancetx
I still don't understand what kind of project could possibly require a Dual 2.5 that could not be done on a Dual 2.0.
The reason is not that I couldn't make due with a 2.0, it's that I couldn't change the order do to technical reasons. Businesses don't want to have things change up on a dime anyway, and with the powermac being a workstation, its aim is mostly at people in business.
Besides, Apple told me a mere 12 hours before the day it was supposed to ship, even if I was able to change my order to a Dual 2.0, would I have gotten it any faster?
ozone (who posted in this thread), talks how he's been waiting 19 days for his 17" powerbook to ship (a product that's been out a long time).
Small businesses and private citizens can see problems instantly and change plans immediately, however larger organizations aren't able to do this--they need time to adjust to situations. Say what you will about Microsoft, at least when they say something's shipping, they mean it. On one shipment of xboxes, they even took a heavy loss using
couriers to get them to a rural best buy on time.
What my company was ordering 30 G5s? Could I just *change* plans and go to my local apple store and buy the 30 of the lower end models? I'd have to drive to both Apple stores in Arizona, as well as a few best buys and both Fry's electronics stores. That's not the way business works. You can't force someone to change their whole supply structure just because you didn't *feel* like telling them in a timely manner.
Delays are one thing, but delaying at the last minute is something completely different.
It's like that pizza analogy, *estimated* shipping time might be 30 minutes, but if it takes 2 hours you still have the right to be pissed off. Imagine if it was delayed nearly 3 weeks?
squire said:
Good luck with the contract. I hope you get it all worked out.
Thanks!
squire said:
As for Apple's shipping times, it seems like they're a habitual problem rather than a few isolated instances. That makes me wonder how accurate the original shipping estimates are. When you place an order for a recently announce but not-yet-shipping product, are they basically lying with the original ship dates to get you hooked? Or are they that delusional that they think there's a possibility of getting the machines out the door in time?
I think it's a mixture of both. Think about it: who knows about Apple's supply problems more than apple does?? why don't they put their estimated times 1 month ahead, since they know it'll probably be delayed that long. They don't do it because shareholders HATE that crap.
I think the main supply problem is, ever since they've outsourced so much of their stuff, they've been having supply chain problems that they don't want to make public. Perhaps the assembly plants are the same places where they assemble Compaqs or Dells, and they don't want quality problems with Dells to be looked at as a problem with Apple as well.
Rumors of possible delays take so long to travel to the PR department, maybe we're hearing about them the same time parts of Apple are hearing about them.
They need more Americans on the ground over there, but alas, that would cost too much :X
This is the way pretty much all hardware is moving. Dell wants an Mp3 player so they ask some Taiwanese plant to stamp them out with Dell Labels on them. It's amazing how much Dell really DOESN'T do. At least Apple makes software :X.
[edit: ignore the grammatical mistakes, it's been a long day and it's only lunch time]