Tablet Mac's?

Discussion in 'Macintosh Computers' started by sphereboy, Jan 8, 2003.

  1. macrumors 6502

    sphereboy

    Joined:
    May 10, 2002
    Location:
    MIAMI.FL.USA
    #1
    Is it just me, or are the PowerBooks going to become similar to what a Tablet PC does now?..

    It looks like it could be so close to that.. with Inkwell and all.

    What's your take on these new Tablet PC's? .. could Apple be trying to squeeze one more revision of the PowerBook before we see it converted to a 'swivel' type PowerBook.
     
  2. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Toekeeyoe, Japan
    #2
    Tablets

    The new powerbooks fill the:

    1) Desktop replacement (aka PowerMac) -> 17"
    2) Standard laptop -> 15"
    3) iBook upgrade (G4 iBook) -> 12"

    As for a tablet, it is easily within reach and probably would fill the mobile line out better, but since they just basically doubled the # mobile machines, asking for a tablet might caused stomachs to ulcer in the Mac marketing group.

    What surprises me is that we didn't see tablet-esque design queues in the new powerbooks - like a stylus and touch screen for example. They don't even look like they are thinking about it. A screen which can be turned around and shut again (so only the screen shows) would have been a tablet! and considering they are pumping how thin these things are, it wouldn't be ergonomically messy to do so. Instead we get backlit keyboard - which is really useless to those who can touch type or have a decent light available... it would have made more sense to put it on the smaller powerbooks since these are more likely to be in a darker location (ie more mobile).

    Hopefully they don't miss this one like they missed the CDRW wave.

    ------------------
    Wyrm
     
  3. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2001
    #3
    Sorry, I just don't see the need for a tablet, and at $2K for one that is smaller then the 12" powerbook, I don't think they will sell many.
     
  4. thread starter macrumors 6502

    sphereboy

    Joined:
    May 10, 2002
    Location:
    MIAMI.FL.USA
    #4
    I didn't think i needed one. BUT when i went to check them out at the store... they seem like a nice toy.. and there is still room for improvement.

    Its nice and fluid.. nice to doodle on.
     
  5. macrumors 6502a

    mangoman

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Location:
    Second Floor
    #5
    Hey, like I've flapped on about before--if they made a tough little Inkwell-capable tablet thingamabob--one that could stand some abuse, especially--I'd be all over that lil' monster like a fly on stink. Price? Who gives a crap!

    Gimme, gimme, gimme.
     
  6. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2002
    Location:
    Muncie, Indiana
    #6
    The number of lines bugs me.

    In 2000, Apple had the following product lines:
    iMac
    iBook
    Powerbook G4 Ti
    Power Mac G4 Cube
    Power Macintosh (tower)

    A total of five lines, each in only one size but with various drive options. Today they have the following product lines:

    iMac (G3)
    iMac (G4)
    eMac
    iBook (2 sizes)
    Powerbook G4 (3 sizes)
    Power Macintosh (tower)

    Six lines, but actually NINE fundamentally different products (not counting the iPod). How can they do this?
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    GeneR

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Location:
    The land of delusions, CA.
    #7
    Are tablets really that much fun?

    I've been looking forward to a Mac tablet too. But it's kind of difficult to see where the market's going when sales across the computer hardware industry seems to be so poor.

    If anyone who has tried a PC tablet is reading this, please help me understand this. I'll probably end up going to a CompUSA to see if there are any to try, but unless it's something that people "can't live without", will we really be seeing the tablet become a standard? Is it too early to tell right now? And for those people who are used to writing on paper and a heavy hand to the pen, are active matrix screens strong enough to take the constant scribbling?

    I dunno. Thanks! :confused:
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    strider42

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2002
    #8
    even MS knows that tablets are a niche market. They aren't aimed at home suers, but rather specialized corporate users. frankly, its not even new. tablets have been around for year and years, just without MS software.

    Now, if someone can tell me why you want a tablet, I'd be impressed. I mean, I can see a few cool applications of it, and the tablet PC's ability to take handwritten notes is pretty cool, but not a killer app. Other than that, all I see is something thats much more expensive and less powerful, that is much more time consuming to enter info into (typing is infinitely faster than writing), that isn't as portable as a notebook (doesn't fold up, or if it does, its going to be bulky), and is going to be less durable (screen is exposed all the time, its gonna get scratched). So how is a tablet possibly better than a laptop for most people. If we accept its a niche market, why would apple want to get into a niche market considering they are already a niche company. They obviously would never dominate that market, MS will.
     
  9. Gus
    macrumors 65816

    Gus

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2002
    Location:
    Minnesota
    #9
    I understand why this bugs you, but it is not now, nor ever will be as bad as the Performa and old Power Mac lines in the 90s. Sheesh, that was awful. That being said, it IS getting a little cluttered comparitively.

    Regards,
    Gus
     
  10. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    New York City
    #10
    <<Now, if someone can tell me why you want a tablet, I'd be impressed.>>

    Okay, I'll tell you. I color comics for a living, and to work on a tablet in Photoshop would be heaven. There's alot of tracing and fine detail work that would go much faster if I had the direct contact a tablet would offer. More than the Wacom I use now. Apple is the heavy favorite of graphic designers and artists and they know it. A tablet may not appeal to some of its customers in education or the average home user, but there ARE a large chunk of us in publishing and the arts who are holding out hope for some sort of tablet down the road.

    TrishMvhl
     
  11. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location:
    on the sofa
    #11
    I am waiting as well...

    "there ARE a large chunk of us in publishing and the arts who are holding out hope for some sort of tablet down the road."

    Ditto. I run my own design company and use G4's and iBooks, and I still have (although I don't use much anymore) some Newton's. I booted up my old Newton 2100 the other day and it reminded me what a different and amazing little machine it is. If Apple were to launch a tablet that had a 12" or 15" screen this would be great for notes in meetings, personal & project management, colouring up artwork, photo re-touching and many other things. I'd also pay almost whatever they asked.

    Although the new Powerbook 17" and 12" are great, I'm willing to hold out a bit longer for a tablet. But if they don't launch one by the end of 2003, I'll be in the frame for a PB... oh and a 970 powered Powermac or three.

    Come on Apple, you spoiled me with the Newton, please launch something that can finally replace it.

    Tom.
     
  12. macrumors 68030

    medea

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2002
    Location:
    Madison, Wi
    #12
    Apple will most likely never bring out a tablet, everything they have said about Tablets have pointed to that, such as "we don't know if the PC Tablets will go anywhere..." or "who wants to write all of their emails anyways?"
    If anything will would get a swivel screen on the laptop for handwrighting input/recognition, not to mention the design of the iMac is pretty close to being ready for a screen like that, but I keep repeating that so.......
     
  13. macrumors 6502a

    mangoman

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Location:
    Second Floor
    #13
    Re: I am waiting as well...

    YES.
     
  14. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2002
    #14
    Granted part of the problem with the many, many, many, many performa models, was that it spread the R&D too thin. But I think more important than that it confused the consumers.

    The current line up may have nine models, but there are still only 2 main product lines. The Power line, the i - line, and then there are the nich products, eMac, xServe, but they don't really count since they are targetted niche products and so aren't really confusing to the customer. If I'm a power user I get a Powerbook or PowerMac. If I'm an average user I get an iBook or an iMac.
     
  15. macrumors 65816

    strider42

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2002
    #15
    thats kind of my point though. publishing and design is a niche market, tablets aren't even useful to everyone in such industries, apple is smaller company, and so I fail to see why apple should make a tablet. Would be nice for a few people, yeah. But I don't know that there is enough of a market to justify the expensive to apple.
     
  16. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location:
    on the sofa
    #16
    Huh? What planet are you on? OK, publishing and design is a niche market in the whole worldwide PC market, but within Apple's market share it is a sizeable proportion (anyone know what percentage?). All the creative professionals I know hanker after an Apple tablet.

    I also think such a device would sell well to a lot of executives (I know and work with a few) who cannot type, but need/want a cutting edge, very smart looking laptop thingy.

    Just my point of view. Flame away if you need to:D

    Tom.
     
  17. macrumors 68000

    dongmin

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    #17
    Wacom already makes what you're talking about: a lcd screen that's touch-sensitive.

    The catch is that it's fairly expensive, $1900 for a 15" version (just for the screen; no computer included). Considering that a good 15" lcd goes for $500 these days, that's a $1400 premium. Ouch!

    To make a really good touch-sensitive screen--something that's better than a Palm screen and hence, useful for graphic artists--is expensive and probably not practical for a mass-market tablet.
     
  18. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Location:
    Seattle
    #18
    Apple MessageSlate

    The Apple MessageSlate was the original (NewtonOS-based) Tablet but was never released. Check it out here:

    http://www.normalkid.com/collector/messageslate.html

    I hope Apple comes out with another iBook/Newton hybrid like the eMate 300 which looks an aweful lot like the clamshell iBooks (but cooler... and with a stylus).

    I'm glad Inkwell is back... It's too bad this technology was dropped in the first place. It's superior to what Microsoft has... and it was available 5 - 6 years ago!
     
  19. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Location:
    Cirencester, UK
    #19
    MS has it wrong...

    Everybody seems stuck on the MS "Laplet" with twist-off screen, but I think this is the wrong design - it is being 2 devices and will likely be both badly.

    To me a true Tablet is a 2nd computer with a 10" screen at most an no keyboard at all (you can buy Mouseki:)). You use it in meetings, on the bus, on the sofa for doing on-the-fly stuff or killing time.

    Meetings - easy notes and presentations
    Bus - email and work preparation
    Sofa - a DVD or Warcraft III

    You do your big FCP edit on your AlBook or PowerMac, but the tablet lets you do an "Eeek!" edit at the clients or email your wife that the train is delayed.

    We can think of it as a Newton 2, even if Apple doesn't.
     
  20. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    New York City
    #20
    Dongmin wrote <<Wacom already makes what you're talking about : a lcd screen that's touch-sensitive.
    The catch is that it's fairly expensive, $1900 for a 15" version (just for the screen; no computer included). Considering that a good 15" lcd goes for $500 these days, that's a $1400 premium. Ouch!>>

    Yes, expensive and heavy. I tried one out at the NY Macworld this past summer. A bit unwieldy and definitely NOT portable! Not the best resoluton either. But it's a new product for them so I imagine they'll keep refining it.

    My ultimate dream machine would be a portable latop/tablet... an all-in-one device. Must have a keyboard - the tablet is no replacement for that. I feel so greedy wanting so many features in something small and light at the same time! Like I said, a dream machine.... :)

    TrishMvhl
     
  21. macrumors 65816

    strider42

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2002
    #21
    I'm on the planet that says that even thuogh its relatively sizeable part of apple's market, its still a niche market, and the people within that niche who would really need this is a niche within that niche. I'm sure there are plenty of people within that market that want one, but hwo many people is that really. Does it really justify the cost of all the R&D into a new hardware device and the new software that would be encessary for it. My guess is no, Steve Jobs himself seems to have serious reservations abuot it. I personally feel the tablet PC is a market MS made up to sell more units. tablet PC's still amount to underpowered, over priced, less durable, less portable laptops in my opinion. I think there are better ways to integrate what the design professionals want without going to a tablet (which everyone would complain is too expensive if they were to come out) Thats just my point of view. No one has ever convinced me there is a viable market for these things, particularly for apple.
     
  22. macrumors 68000

    lmalave

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Location:
    Chinatown NYC
    #22
    Re: MS has it wrong...

    Or the best idea I've read, posted on another forum, is all of the above functionality plus the ability to act as a "smart display" for a PowerMac or iMac. Prices are going to have to come way down, though, to well under $1000.
     
  23. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Location:
    Cirencester, UK
    #23
    Re: Re: MS has it wrong...

    Yes, price is vital. I think $899 at most for

    - 9" touch screen
    - 600Mhz G3
    - 256Mb RAM
    - 20Gb disk
    - CDROM/DVDROM
    - 1 Firewire (including charging)
    - 1 USB
    - Airport
    - Bluetooth
    - VGA
    - MacOS X

    It becomes an ultracompact Mac/Newton, and there's enough scope there for a white one and an 'aluminum' one.
     
  24. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2002
    #24
    If apple were to make a tablet, heres what I think they would do.

    Simply put, a powerbook with a screen that when you open it, its a normal powerbook. Then you have the option of swivelling the screen backwards, and closing it. So you basically have a huge 12, 15, or even a 17 inch slate tablet. It would allow apple to say they innovated tablets by making them labtops and tablets at the same time.

    Think of a graphic designer on a plane, in painter and photoshop with a powerbook tablet drawing on it. It would be great!!
     
  25. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Location:
    Cirencester, UK
    #25
    But that's exactly what the other Laplets do. To me the hinge is just begging to twist-off, and it adds to the expense.

    No, for Apple to innovate they need to make a true tablet - they need to throw their weight behind pen input.

    Hell, they invented it!
     

Share This Page