The Cool Slut Mom is back!

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by XNine, Nov 15, 2005.

  1. XNine macrumors 68040

    XNine

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Location:
    Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?
    #1
  2. jsw Moderator emeritus

    jsw

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Location:
    Andover, MA
    #2
    Yes, thank goodness pedophiles don't live in any other states. :rolleyes:

    She'll be out in 10 on good behavior, sadly.
     
  3. xli_ne macrumors 6502a

    xli_ne

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Location:
    Center of the Nation
  4. GorillaPaws macrumors 6502a

    GorillaPaws

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Location:
    Richmond, VA
    #4
    I think the saddest part is that the Colorado tax payers get to put here up. Too bad they can't seize her assets to offset the cost.

    Edit: And not THOSE assets, pervs :D
     
  5. Moof1904 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    #5
    There was a case in north Dallas this week about a woman with a six month old daughter. This [insert string of expletives here] didn't bother feeding her child much more than once or twice a day and the child, at six months old, had gained only one pound since birth.

    The baby had begun sucking her thumb (as many babies do) and it angered the woman. To stop the baby from sucking her thumb, scumbag mom coated the thumb with a heavy thick paste of chili powder, cayenne, and other such things. The baby was so starved that she sucked her thumb despite the slathered paste on her thumb and when her throat swelled up from the irritation, the baby suffocated and died.

    Scumbag mom was sentenced to 7 years.

    So, Colorado mom gets 30 years for contributing to delinquency and north Texas mom gets 7 years for killing her child.

    People recover from delinquency. Dead is dead.
     
  6. XNine thread starter macrumors 68040

    XNine

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Location:
    Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?
    #6
    Hey, That's America, man. I'm not saying its right, cos its not, it's complete bull****, but the sad fact is that our justice system is so ****ed up, this is what goes on.
     
  7. obeygiant macrumors 68040

    obeygiant

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Location:
    totally cool
    #7
    Whats really ****ed up is that those dumb kids spilled the beans to get her in trouble. :p:);)
     
  8. Dont Hurt Me macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Location:
    Yahooville S.C.
    #8
    30 years for consensual sex yet murderers,rapist,child molesters, Enron executives dont get that kind of time. Our whole System if a F.up mess. Im sure those boys enjoyed every minute of it while it was going on. Another person thrown in Jail who doesnt need to be in my view but i bet that they let some real bad person out to make room for her. Its not about justice our system is about the "appearance" of justice.
     
  9. MongoTheGeek macrumors 68040

    MongoTheGeek

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Location:
    Its not so much where you are as when you are.
    #9
    Not really consensual. The kids were too young.

    Additionally considering the strong tendency for abused children to become abusers consider the girls they will be raping in 5-10 years and prison terms they'll be serving. I am not saying that the boys will
     
  10. Dont Hurt Me macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Location:
    Yahooville S.C.
    #10
    How old were those boys? They were in high school so they had to be in the teens, if they were teenagers she should get less time. like i said i have seen real crimes that didnt get that time.
     
  11. emw macrumors G4

    emw

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    #11
    They were in high school, and I think 16 and 17 years old (which is old enough to be married in at least Georgia). So it wasn't legally consensual, I suppose, but kids this age are having sex with each other on a regular basis. They knew what was happening and kept doing it. It wasn't a one-time thing.

    Not to excuse the woman for doing it, however. But 30 years? Come on. Likely because it was multiple felonies, vs. one (a murder).
     
  12. MongoTheGeek macrumors 68040

    MongoTheGeek

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Location:
    Its not so much where you are as when you are.
    #12
    I thought they were 14. Perhaps I was confounding this with other stories.

    I am not positive about this but perhaps she is only doing 1-2 years on each of the charges but serving them back to back since there were multiple parties.
     
  13. velocityg4 macrumors 68040

    velocityg4

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2004
    Location:
    Georgia
    #13
    They were in high school. From what I remember this would have been a dream come true to most any high school boy. I'd have been stoked if my buddies MILF gave me booze and drugs (well weed, I would have refused hard core stuff) then took me to her bedroom. By high school guys who would not be interested in this would not hang out there in the first place. This nation is still in the control of prudes.
     
  14. XNine thread starter macrumors 68040

    XNine

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Location:
    Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?
    #14

    I agree that prudes run this country. DOWN WITH OLD PEOPLE AND SOCCER MOMS!!!!

    And it's not just 20 years for the sex, but for providing illegal substances and alcohol to minors.
     
  15. slimflem macrumors regular

    slimflem

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    #16
    Old people will always run the country. It's when we are young that we think it will be different when some of the old people aren't in control anymore. Sadly, this isn't the case. As the existing old people roll off, new ones roll on. These news ones were once young ones with more relaxed ideals and opinions. Everyone grows up and ruins it for the young people.
     
  16. Jon'sLightBulbs macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Location:
    Chicago
    #17
    If you're a constitutional law scholar correct me...

    The utilitarian public policy reason for statutes prohibiting underage sex is to reduce the number of women who, unprepared, have children at too young an age. There is really no similar public policy argument to forbid too-young males from having sex. The only reason males are included in the statutory rape laws is to prevent state legislatures from having to deal with the heightened scrutiny of courts if they'd singled out women as a class. Prohibiting younger boys from having sex is pointless from a policy point of view.
     
  17. jadekitty24 macrumors 65816

    jadekitty24

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Location:
    The poor section of Connecticut
    #18
    I feel she should be held accountable for her actions. These are teenaged boys, and the general rule is "under 18 is a child". But the sentence is extreme...in this case. Murderers and real child molesters get off with less. I know for a fact. Still, at such an immpressionable age an example should be set.
     
  18. Le Big Mac macrumors 68020

    Le Big Mac

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    #19
    Your argument neglects possible psychological problems resulting from underage sex. Dunno what studies say on this, but there are plenty of people who wished they'd "waited" (not necessarily for marriage).
     
  19. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #21
    Yes, sort of sucks that they don't have public brothels for those convicted of sex crimes. :eek:
     
  20. themacman macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Location:
    kc
    #22
    yeah i saw taht its crazy. wow, the boys must be quite embarased.
     
  21. LethalWolfe macrumors G3

    LethalWolfe

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #23
    This, plus the fact that it was 8 boys involved (5 of which she had sex with, 3 that were just drugs and alcohol). So there are multiple crimes against multiple victims she's been convicted of. It averages out to about 4 years per victim.


    Lethal
     
  22. jadekitty24 macrumors 65816

    jadekitty24

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Location:
    The poor section of Connecticut
    #24
    Broken down like that, point well taken.
     
  23. freeny macrumors 68020

    freeny

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Location:
    Location: Location:
    #25
    Dude, I just threw up from reading that:(
     

Share This Page