The fight for HD Blu vs HD

Discussion in 'Community Discussion' started by crazycat, Aug 6, 2007.

  1. macrumors 65816


    Dec 5, 2005
    I did not want to make such a post for some time now, i decided this is the right time since people started to pick sides and i would like to know how the war is going.

    I myself picked Blu-ray, there are 3 major reasons why i did so. One, you can fit more data one a blue-ray disk, two Apple seems to think its a winner and they have not been wrong in the last few years and because the more good movies are coming out on blu-ray. I started my Blu-ray collection, around 20 unites strong and i have some HD-DVD (4-5).

    I would like to know if people have already picked a side or are still waiting.
  2. macrumors regular


    Jun 27, 2007
    hard to say for me, I have both a 360 HD DVD player and a sony blue ray home player and have found myself using the HDDVD for 1 main reason it supports HD DVD and SD DVD. this is why i feel this format will win out over all. And if you notice all the major release titles like 300 were released on all formats Blu ray and HD DVD. the dual format is what will win in the long run I feel. Time will tell..
  3. macrumors 6502a

    Jan 13, 2003
    I picked HD DVD. Bought the Xbox360 add-on for $179 last week. It came with King Kong and an offer of 5 HD DVD's for free by mail. Can't wait for them to arrive.

    My reasons are:

    I found that HD DVD format had more of the movies I want.

    Internet content: HD DVD allows downloading of extras since Network Connectivity is part of the standard for HD DVD. Not sure it that's true of BR. This allow extra content to be downloaded so it's less likely you'll end up having to buy "The Delux Edition" with more extras and updates.

    DVD-HD/DVD combo format. Some content is available on a dual disk format, DVD and HD DVD on the same disk. At least if HD DVD goes belly-up I will still have usable movies that will play on a BR player. I tested it with "300" and "Hot Fuzz". Works just fine but the disks cost a few dollars more.

    I'm not planning to invest too heavily on replacing my library. I'll buy the combo format when possible and downloading movies works for me as well. I'm thinking of subscribing to NetFlix, they have HD DVD content that costs the same as regular. I just don't want to end up with a useless library of "Betamax" disks.
  4. Moderator emeritus


    Jul 19, 2002
    In this case, I am staying on the sideline and see what the market dictates.

    Then I may jump in.
  5. macrumors 68000


    Aug 11, 2003
    I went with Blu-ray because it clearly has more movie studio support and more hardware manufacturers support than HD DVD. Plus it didn't hurt that I can have both a top notch Blu-ray player (that also nicely upscales SD DVDs) and a next generation game console all in one with the Sony PS3.
  6. macrumors 603


    Jun 10, 2006
    If I were to buy today, I could choose Blu-Ray. But since I am not ready to invest in something that could very well go belly up within the next year and lose all support... I am waiting it out :)
  7. macrumors 68040


    Feb 17, 2003
    with Hamburglar.
    wait, Blu ray players won't play standard def DVDs?
  8. macrumors 65816


    Sep 11, 2003
    it's all up to the porn industry.

    they decided on vhs over betamax, and that ended that argument.
  9. macrumors 68020

    Feb 12, 2005
    You might as well leave the stadium, get in your car and drive away before the fans start breaking bottles over heads in anger.

    I'm of the opinion that neither format will win. It's crazy expensive compared to regular DVD, the titles are limited, the gains are minimal. And to see any gain at all, you'd have to buy all new equipment, including a new television. I don't think the vast majority of people are going to buy into the hype because current DVDs are good enough for most.

    If you're familiar with the Quadraphonic audio war of the 1970s, you'll notice there are striking similarities. And in that case, neither were able to supplant regular old stereo sound for exactly the same reasons today.

    But that's not to say something newer and better won't be successful later on...
  10. macrumors 68020

    Feb 12, 2005
    I suspect most people get their porn from the internet these days.
  11. macrumors 603


    Dec 19, 2002
    I'd rather blu-ray win, as it seems to be the better standard, tech wise (more space, better content protection), but I'm not choosing a side until it's all said and done. I refuse to pony up for something that could be archaic in a few months. I'll stick to seeing movies in the theater until then. :)
  12. macrumors 65816


    May 25, 2006
    Arlington VA
    I was seriously considering the HD-DVD add on for the 360, but the titles you get for free are lame.
    I'd rather wait until more movies come out on either format, then i will make my decision. Wouldn't hurt to have a TV capable of 1080p.

    EDIT: YAY! My 1000th Post :D:cool::):apple:
  13. macrumors Core


    Jan 18, 2005
    Darkplace Hospital
    I'd rather HD-DVD win, everything else aside - it's region free. I don't want to be locked to a specific region kthx.

    I've yet to buy into the HD movie market. Probably because I don't really care for films, and I've got much better things to spend my money on. Such as fancy new iMacs :D

    And I've always said the internet will win this one. Even on my 512kbps connection.
  14. macrumors 68040


    Nov 9, 2004
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Blu-Ray via PS3 here. One of the main reasons I bought a PS3 was for the Blu-Ray player. HD-DVD is backed by MS which is a huge strike against it in my mind. Although, of course, Blu-Ray being Sony technology puts others off I suppose. Anyway Blu-Ray does seem to be winning, and I like the idea of the increased storage it offers
  15. macrumors regular

    Apr 11, 2007
    MI, USA

    ...they helped DVD's get into the main stream.
  16. adk
    macrumors 68000


    Nov 11, 2005
    Stuck in the middle with you

    The prices of the players will come down. The players are only in their first or second generations. I think we'll see HD-DVD players for under $200 within a few years (if they're still around) and I'm not sure about Blu-ray.

    The real problem is that only 30% of US households even own an HDTV (source). I predict that the format war will soon stagnate because nobody cares that much about it. Until the price of a decently sized HDTV comes down significantly the market for these players will soon be saturated.
  17. Moderator emeritus


    Jul 19, 2002
    That much is certain.

    Hard to believe the price of CD players when they were introduced.

    My first one was a Pioneer and one of the first on the market. Retail price was $1,500. I got it on sale for half price.

    Now you can get a portable CD player with more features, better sound, etc. for $20-30.

    Regarding HD-DVD or Blu-Ray, both have their benefits. Personally, I like the HD-DVD concept because you can play your current SD DVDs.

    A majority of folks still have a regular TV in their home. HDTV has not been adapted US/Worldwide yet. It will come. These things take time.

    For this iteration, I am happy to sit on the sidelines and watch the others on the bleeding edge, if you will. Right now SD via DVD is enough for me.

    To each his own.
  18. macrumors 68000

    Jun 13, 2004
    I am more inclined towards blu-ray for now, as I am intending to get a PS3, however, I have not made any purchases yet and I am still waiting for more signs about where this format war is going.
  19. macrumors 68040


    Nov 9, 2004
    Salt Lake City, UT
    What is this all about? Blu-Ray players can play regular DVDs too. Just because HD-DVD has "DVD" in the name doesn't somehow make it more closely related technologically to DVD...
  20. Moderator emeritus


    Jul 19, 2002
    From Wikipedia:

    "While it is not compulsory for manufacturers, the Blu-ray Disc Association recommends that Blu-ray Disc drives should be capable of reading standard DVDs for backward compatibility."

    I remember seeing some Blu-Ray players that could not play DVDs. But that may only be here in Japan.

    I know that LG makes a player that can play both Blu-Ray, HD-DVD as well as standard DVDs. I would imagine that most companies will go this same route where they have one player that plays all formats.

    As I said before, I'll wait until the dust settles.
  21. macrumors 603


    Aug 20, 2005
    Thank you Jah...I'm so Blessed
    I have a PS3 and all the other bluray player I've seen had regular DVD support so I haven't seen one player without that option...I guess the manufactures see as a must to include(wise decision)

    I've seen the quality of both and they look exactly the same with bluray offering more storeage space which is a plus.....whoever wins I'll support:D

  22. jng
    macrumors 65816


    Apr 6, 2007
    Right. I too am waiting. But mostly, I don't have an HD TV nor do I feel the need to buy one right now.

    Having just graduated from college, I don't think it's anything I really need. I don't watch much tv in the first place (I also don't have cable) and if I were to buy a TV, I would need to add HD service, which is rather annoying.

    I don't think HD TVs are that expensive. I'd love to buy one, but it's also not very high on my priority list. My current tv does the job fine.

    Actually I don't even use my tv often. It just sits in the living room. I watch more movies on an ACD now.
  23. macrumors Core


    Jan 4, 2002
    That was because VHS was cheaper. If betamax was cheaper they would of gone there. Time will tell who wins, depends on the number of movies.

Share This Page