The loto

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by stubeeef, Dec 6, 2004.

  1. stubeeef macrumors 68030

    stubeeef

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    #1
    In NC we have struggled with the legislation for a long time, should we or should we not, start a state wide lottery.

    I am anti-lottery for a lot of reasons, tax on the poor is primary, but ethically as well. Are we teaching the right lessons to our kids, gamble on a secure future, or build one.

    Anyway this is an article I happened across.
     
  2. blackfox macrumors 65816

    blackfox

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Location:
    PDX
    #2
    divorced from the (very real) considerations of your post, the Lottery is a big revenue-generator for the State and most of them sure could use the money.

    I despise gambling, but if the revenue goes to something like Education, then I can probably live with it.

    also here in Oregon we have video-poker machines (referred to as video-crack) which in many cases make more money for the businesses they are located in (bars primarily) than their actual sales. So that kinda helps small businesses.

    Gambling is a tricky thing, as it is technically voluntary in nature (for many).
     
  3. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #3
    Get rid of the Lotto and people will be sticking their money into the tribal casinos, and talk about some mismanaged tribal money. :rolleyes:

    It would be one thing if some of the tribes would deal fairly with corporations and states, but they don't always do it.

    Heck, I've seen and heard some stuff they've done down the street to the south -- vs. the tribe up north.

    And they don't really have any revenue coming in beside the casinos, and heavy industry. If they would deal fairly, people would be willing to lease the land and put up condos, shopping, offices, etc. which provide more than just cash (ie, jobs).

    I always liked dealing with them, please come down today, and you go down -- you'll have to leave, you're not allowed on the property.

    So let's kill the Lotto, and shift the gambling dollar to the casinos.

    ---

    Edit: of course the Lottery Monkey is a prime example of a reason to kill it, along with the fractured lives, families, and bankruptcies that come with instant wealth.
     
  4. stubeeef thread starter macrumors 68030

    stubeeef

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    #4
    The problem I find is that the revenue just replaces what the taxes were paying for, and education doesn't seem to get any more money than they were before. And it seems very regressive, the least able seem to pump the most in, even if baby needs new shoes. I would rather pay a tax.
     
  5. blackfox macrumors 65816

    blackfox

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Location:
    PDX
    #5
    I almost spit out my coffee!! Did you just say you'd rather pay a tax?

    It is early, I might still be asleep I guess...

    seriously, I applaud (and agree) with the sentiment. My point was that it often succeeds purely on it's strength (or weakness) in amoral economic terms.
     
  6. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #6
    I agree with stu on this one. I've always been opposed to state-sponsored gambling. Of the things the states ought to be doing, surely this isn't one of them. The best description of lotteries I've ever seen is "a voluntary tax on the naive."
     
  7. stubeeef thread starter macrumors 68030

    stubeeef

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    #7
    Sorry about the spitting thing, but I am not aware of any taxes ever going down or away when lotteries moved in. So I would actually still paying whatever tax already levied anyway. Government is by magnitudes the least effecient means of distributing wealth, that it is my main beef with taxes, along with half the crap/waste programs that get funding. Like the arts funding that gave us a crucifix in a mason jar of urine.

    I am guessing that most here are well educated, do you or your friends spend more than 2 or 3 bills a week on a lottery? How many of you-4/5/or 6+. Or is it the occassional just "because" thing.
     
  8. stubeeef thread starter macrumors 68030

    stubeeef

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    #8
    Holy crap, about popped out an eyeball, :p :p :p !
     
  9. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #9
    Yecch. This thread is definitely getting too graphic for this time of the morning.
     
  10. blackfox macrumors 65816

    blackfox

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Location:
    PDX
    #10
    Although I am not sure I agree with what you might be implying (as a generalization), I have never played the lottery. I have played scratch-off tickets perhaps 10 times (I once won $50 yay), and occasionally gamble if in Vegas or at the racetrack, but that is merely incidental to the general experience.

    No friends gamble (other than what I have described), my youngest brother used to gamble on the video-poker machines, before his wife put a stop to that. My Dad had played the lotto for 10 years, spending however much that costs. He enjoys it, however.
     
  11. Chip NoVaMac macrumors G3

    Chip NoVaMac

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2003
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    #11
    Some of us are not opposed to paying taxes, in particular when it is labeled a tax - not some damn users fee, or this-or-that fee.

    No sure what is worse; tax-and-spend or tax relief-and-spend.
     
  12. blackfox macrumors 65816

    blackfox

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Location:
    PDX
    #12
    It was merely a rhetorical statement for Stu...of course I agree in the utility of Taxes when utilized well.
     
  13. stubeeef thread starter macrumors 68030

    stubeeef

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    #13
    A recent breakdown of who pays what by %

    I think that we are double and triple and multitaxed! Like you say taxes and fees are out of hand. I pay the US government then my state, then county, then city, then sales, then license fees, dog fees, then 2.50 for a school lunch!

    the layers of taxes would be different if I got a credit for state taxes paid vs a deduction. I am all for the common good in the sense of taxes for police, fire, and military. I don't begrudge some gov funded help services. But lets face it, take your gross pay and divide it into the total deductions for SS, MM, St and Fed income tax-that is what your paying. To be more accurate figure in any taxes paid or refunded on April 15th.

    April 15th, now is it coincidence that it is almost as far from Nov elections as possible? I think we should hold national elections on April 16th! That would change a lot.

    I can give 1,000 in taxes or 1,000 to local and national charities and get 10 times the effect.

    The lottery just doesn't seem to really change the equation, it is like kirks son's use of anti-matter, a folly!
     
  14. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #14
    I thought that was "proto-matter" used in the Genesis Matrix.

    If he had used "anti-matter" he would have been building a Darwin Matrix.

    ;)
     
  15. stubeeef thread starter macrumors 68030

    stubeeef

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    #15
    Oviously! How could I have confused those! Silly of me, good of you to correct me. Genesis is folly to duplicate, for we are not supernatural, and darwin matrix takes too long! ;)
     
  16. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #16
    Well if you make as many shortcuts with the Darwin Matrix as David Marcus did with the Genesis Matrix in order to shrink the uber long process, your only reward will be the Darwin Award. ;)
     
  17. pseudobrit macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #17
    I don't like what gambling does to a certain percentage of the population either, but like alcohol, tobacco and someday marijuana, there are some things that you just have to live with. I think it's better if the state controls the business of necessary vice.
     
  18. Roger1 macrumors 65816

    Roger1

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Location:
    Michigan
    #18
    In Michigan, something like 600 million went to school districts(from the lottery). A school discrict of about 3400-3500 students gets about 30 million dollars in funding. Just to help put it in perspective.
     
  19. stubeeef thread starter macrumors 68030

    stubeeef

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    #19
    Yes, they get that funding, but are they the exception and get more than they would have using tax dollars. It seems as soon as the lotto money rolls in the tax monies are pulled out and the schools net no more than they would have without the lotto.
     
  20. Roger1 macrumors 65816

    Roger1

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Location:
    Michigan
    #20
    I'm not sure if it works that way, but I do know recently we've had our budget cut several times in the last couple of years. It's been around 40-50 dollars per kid, but that adds up after a while.
     
  21. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #21
    That's exactly right -- it's the old bait and switch routine. General tax dollars are withdrawn as the lotto money comes on line. After a short while, the schools become heavily dependent on how many people are willing to gamble away their incomes. Supporting education with vice just never seemed like a good fit to me.
     
  22. takao macrumors 68040

    takao

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2003
    Location:
    Dornbirn (Austria)
    #22
    personally i have absolutly nothing against it ..just like anyother thing that doesn'T affect other persons

    my father plays from time to time when there is more to win ...

    never played myself


    for visiting casinos here you have to be 21 ...compared to drinking beer/smoking 16,drinking strong stuff/driving car/voting 18 it's rather high age

    and of course you only can get in with a suit including tie (or better) ;)
     
  23. Mechcozmo macrumors 603

    Mechcozmo

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2004
    #23
    In California, it is 15.5 for a permit, 16 for restricted license, 18 to drive. But that is changing to 17.5 for permit, 18 you drive with some restrictions. I dunno any more than that. And it is 21 to drink.
     
  24. katchow macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Location:
    Dayton, Ohio
    #24
    privatized social security - the lottery of the future :)
     
  25. Chip NoVaMac macrumors G3

    Chip NoVaMac

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2003
    Location:
    Northern Virginia
    #25
    Yeah, isn't it DeLay that nows owes the bank for campaign funds he invested in the stock market?
     

Share This Page