The low-down on why iPod "father" Tony Fadell really left ...

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Nov 15, 2008.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    #1
  2. macrumors Nehalem

    GoCubsGo

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    #2
    This is sort of interesting and I don't think many should be surprised about this,
    Quite frankly if Fadell's last great contribution was the Nano and his contributions excluded anything "touch" then I think I'd either push to get involved in the "Touch" iPods, or bow out gracefully with my giant wad-o-cash.
     
  3. Moderator emeritus

    sushi

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Location:
    キャンプスワ&#
  4. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    #4
    Fair decision... not much more will happen with the iPod line.
     
  5. macrumors 601

    DMann

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2002
    Location:
    10023
    #5
    And on that high note, he left the stage........
     
  6. macrumors 604

    SnowLeopard2008

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2008
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
    #6
    ^ Yea, I don't know what else could be introduced to the iPod line. All the iPods with screens can view Cover Flow and video content. Tony Fadell developed the base for multi touch media players. Now it can back to bite his ass.
     
  7. macrumors 68000

    Saladinos

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    #7
    Apple's iPod line is dying anyway. The classic will probably be dropped within a year. That'll leave the Nano and Shuffle as the only real iPods Apple make.

    The iPhone isn't an iPod to me. It never has been. There's too much distracting the experience for it to feel like an iPod. The iPod touch has the same problem. It's browsing the web and checking your emails, and downloading applications from the AppStore. It's overcrowded, and it feels more like a phone or PDA than an iPod. That's my opinion. I don't use my iPhone for music nearly as often as I used my 5.5G iPod.

    The shuffle isn't much of an iPod either. It's a fantastic little device, but it doesn't feel much like an iPod. There's very limited space, and the lack of a screen makes the classic wheel interface useless. That wheel interface is a large point of what makes an iPod.

    That leaves the nano as the only real iPod left, if the classic goes. Apple's been radically changing it's design, because I don't feel they know where to take it.
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    aaquib

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    #8
    Apple's redefining the meaning of the word "iPod". No longer is it just a music player, but its a touchscreen hub with media, games, Safari, Mail and more.
     
  9. Moderator emeritus

    sushi

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Location:
    キャンプスワ&#
    #9
    Seems to be going that way.

    The iPhone/iPod touch has shown this.

    My guess is that once the Flash memory of the touch reaches 64GB, or maybe 128GB, the Classic will be phased out leaving the touch, Nano and Shuffle models, and of course the iPhone.
     
  10. macrumors 68000

    mklos

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2002
    Location:
    My house!
    #10
    Well I think you have to keep evolving the iPod. You need to keep giving people to either upgrade their existing iPod, or buy one for the first time. So if it means adding Safari, airport, touch full screen games, etc then so be it.

    I agree the iPod is starting to die a slow death, but its being replaced by something of its own creation, the iPhone. No longer do you have to carry around and iPod AND cell phone. Apple has combined both into one device. Its a very safe bet that the iPhone is starting to be a competitor to the iPod itself and may eventually outsell it.

    So while some people may not like the touch iPods, Apple has paved the way for touch devices. Its the new wave of the future. Everyone will be going touch for their devices. If they don't, they'll get left behind. Why do you think all of a sudden you see lots of new touch cellphones?
     
  11. macrumors 604

    Digital Skunk

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2006
    Location:
    In my imagination
    #11
    It will be a while before the Classic is gone. There are still some people that need to hold more than a few songs, videos and games. For me, 32GB only covers a third of my video library which I access often.

    Sunshine is my current favorite and I am on my third watch, second for my iPod.
     
  12. macrumors 603

    Stella

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Canada
    #12
    If the iPod didn't evolve, then it would die a slow and painful death like other media players in the past.

    The Touch is a necessary evolution to carry on the iPod line.

    All products have a life span, they either evolve or die.
     
  13. macrumors 601

    DMann

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2002
    Location:
    10023
    #13
    Evolution is the product of innovation, which has kept Apple evolving consistently since 1997. With OLED, PMC memory, and Nanowire battery technology, the evolutionary future of the iPod/iPhone/flexible tablet is indeed promising.
     

Share This Page