The Official Santa Rosa waiting thread!

Discussion in 'Buying Tips and Advice' started by generik, Sep 8, 2006.

  1. generik macrumors 601

    generik

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Location:
    Minitrue
  2. M. Malone macrumors 6502a

    M. Malone

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2004
    #2
    you're kidding?! already? I'm still waiting for the MacBook Pros to come in Merom :D
     
  3. Mac Rules macrumors 6502

    Mac Rules

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Location:
    Switzerland
    #3
    Th only reason that I'm waiting, is because firstly, I can't afford a Mac at least until next spring, so my first purchase should hopfully be a santa rose MBP with Leopard.

    Cheers
     
  4. nitynate macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
  5. generik thread starter macrumors 601

    generik

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Location:
    Minitrue
    #5
    But but... Apple won't be using the 64 bit variants of NAPA chipsets in them! It will be as good as 32 bits!
     
  6. ZoomZoomZoom macrumors 6502a

    ZoomZoomZoom

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    #6
    *crickets chirp* :D
     
  7. generik thread starter macrumors 601

    generik

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Location:
    Minitrue
    #7
    *Hay bundles blow pass...*
     
  8. anim8or macrumors 65816

    anim8or

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Location:
    Scotland, UK
    #8

    This is only conjecture at the moment! An over reaction from a worried merom fan....

    ...can u prove this 32 bit accusation!

    There is no point in starting a panic that people are not really getting a 64 bit processor with merom when one doesnt have the proof!
     
  9. NextTuesday macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2006
    Location:
    Cork, Ireland
    #9
    Oh deary me, please people, I'm begging you, hold out for Memrom, buy Memrom and then be happy. Upgrade in 2 years to the latest and greatest.
     
  10. risc macrumors 68030

    risc

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #10
    I have a MacBook Pro here and yeah I'll upgrade it when the Santa Rosa based machines are released. I can see no reason for people to have waited all this time for Merom and then to purchase it when the technology hasn't fully matured. There are enough reasons to hold off for Santa Rosa IMO faster fsb, better wireless, etc.
     
  11. extraextra macrumors 68000

    extraextra

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Location:
    California
    #11
    When is it coming out? I heard Janurary but then Intel said something about delays (that could've been something else though :p). I'm probably not going to wait past March.
     
  12. Unorthodox macrumors 65816

    Unorthodox

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Location:
    Not at the beach...
  13. nsknike macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2005
  14. THX1139 macrumors 68000

    THX1139

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    #14
    You can order in January for June delivery. ;)
     
  15. generik thread starter macrumors 601

    generik

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Location:
    Minitrue
    #15
    Hey.. I am THINKING of waiting too!

    And besides I'd rather have the money in my bank account gaining interest rather than in Apple's pocket :)
     
  16. QCassidy352 macrumors G3

    QCassidy352

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Location:
    Bay Area
    #16
    well, I wouldn't say I'm "waiting," but I certainly am not going to sell my MB to buy a merom version that's a marginal improvement. So yeah, Santa Rosa could be my next purchase.
     
  17. FFTT macrumors 68030

    FFTT

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Location:
    A Stoned Throw From Ground Zero
    #17
    From what I'm reading Merom is already part of the Santa Rosa platform, but
    this April there will be improvements in the form of a faster frontside bus and improved wireless chips.

    The Penryn platform due 2nd quarter 2007 is where the Merom design gets shrinked to 45 nm.

    So for notebook buyers, it's still a bit of a rocky road to that cool running performance per watt and energy efficiency that we all hope for.

    If you already have a working Apple notebook, you're in much better shape than anyone who must buy something soon.


    This roadmap gives you a good idea of what to look forward to.

    http://www.mikeshardware.co.uk/RoadmapQ107.htm
     
  18. generik thread starter macrumors 601

    generik

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Location:
    Minitrue
    #18
    Looking at these roadmaps it does seem kinda demoralising, something better is always in the horizon! :D

    At least it beats the gloomy PPC days though... :eek:
     
  19. generik thread starter macrumors 601

    generik

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Location:
    Minitrue
    #19
    How is it then that the iMacs are limited to only 3GB of memory? It is as if the memory controller doesn't understand anything > 4GB!
     
  20. FFTT macrumors 68030

    FFTT

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Location:
    A Stoned Throw From Ground Zero
    #20
    It gets even crazier because some of these code names are for the main CPU processors and some are code names for wireless chips.

    Then you get into the new VRAM cards which should eventually reduce heat
    and energy demands along the way.

    Steve's Intel keynote stressed perfomance per watt, so you can rest assured that's where it's all heading.

    All my experience following this stuff, tells me to be patient.

    If you must buy something fairly soon, I would buy conservatively.
     
  21. yg17 macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
  22. ~Shard~ macrumors P6

    ~Shard~

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2003
    Location:
    1123.6536.5321
    #22
    Intel's next mobile chip - read a bit about it here.

    This thread is kind of silly though, as Santa Rosa is not coming out for a long time. Might as well start a ""Waiting for Penryn" thread, or even better, a "Waiting for Dunnington" thread while you're at it! :p ;) :D
     
  23. FFTT macrumors 68030

    FFTT

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Location:
    A Stoned Throw From Ground Zero
    #23
    It sounds WAAAAY off but if you're someone who is saving for a new notebook
    that gives you 6-7 months to save $200-$300 per month.

    A rushed decision is more likely to adversely affect those buying on credit.
     
  24. Chundles macrumors G4

    Chundles

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2005
  25. FFTT macrumors 68030

    FFTT

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Location:
    A Stoned Throw From Ground Zero
    #25
    Just some more info on Intel's roadmap.

    http://news.com.com/Intel+stays+on+dual-core+track+through+2008/2100-1006_3-6071046.html

    But Penryn is a dual-core 45-nanometer chip specifically designed for notebooks, sources said. Wolfdale is the name of the dual-core 45nm chip that will be slated for desktops in that time frame. Penryn is essentially a smaller version of Merom, which is due in August, while Wolfdale is a smaller version of Conroe, scheduled for a July launch.

    Penryn and Wolfdale are among the first chips that will arrive based on the Nehalem microarchitecture, the successor to the Core architecture. Intel's decision to make those products be dual-core chips illustrate its focus on making sure new designs can be manufactured in large volumes, said Mercury Research analyst Dean McCarron, after learning of the plan.

    There's an inherent level of risk involved when a chip company is introducing a new manufacturing technology, as Intel will do with Penryn and Wolfdale, McCarron said. Chipmakers can't be sure how the new manufacturing process will behave while cranking out chips by the millions, which means they tend to start off with designs that they already understand, he said.

    So Intel is using multichip packaging technology to create its first quad-core processors in 2007, just as it used multichip packaging to create its first dual-core chips in 2005. Kentsfield, the quad-core chip, is really just two Conroe processors packaged together. While there is a slight performance tradeoff in this approach, and chip purists find it inelegant, it allows Intel to maximize its yields, the number of working processors that can be cut from a silicon wafer, McCarron said.
     

Share This Page