The Post-Core i7 Era Unveiled

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Jul 8, 2009.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    #1
  2. macrumors P6

    Tallest Skil

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2006
    Location:
    1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
    #2
    So we're just going to ignore Gulftown and Arrandale, then?

    Westmere: "No respect, no respect! Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk..."
     
  3. macrumors G4

    wrldwzrd89

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2003
    Location:
    Solon, OH
    #3
    What caught my eye in this article was the AVX additions. It's about time Intel caught up with PowerPC's AltiVec system - SSE4's good, but not good enough. Yet. :p
     
  4. Guest

    iGary

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Location:
    Randy's House
    #4
    I've lost track of the whole roadmap. It almost doesn't matter anymore (at least to me).
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    Blue Fox

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    #5
    I'm with you on that.
     
  6. macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2007
    Location:
    Virginia
    #6
    For your average Mac user it actually doesn't matter. The only positive for those that care, is all the choices Apple could go with in the future. Plus it gives you something to look forward to.
     
  7. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    #7
    The superiority of Altivec didn't stop PowerPC from being trounced by x86 when it came to performance, now did it?
     
  8. macrumors G4

    wrldwzrd89

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2003
    Location:
    Solon, OH
    #8
    This is true. Still, though - x86 users could use a vector performance boost.
     
  9. macrumors 603

    chrmjenkins

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Location:
    CA
    #9
    I'm not sure that this gives us any new info other than a fuzzy picture of a die.
     
  10. macrumors 603

    nuckinfutz

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2002
    Location:
    Middle Earth
    #10
    Depends

    Intel process always did a good job on Integer performance the the G5 processor owned for Floating Point.

    Your statement is half correct at best.
     
  11. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    #11
    Im a bit confused

    I love hearing about new things especially when it means faster easier or better, I guess I am just a 34 year old kid! However I'm confused didn't the chip industry try this before and then abandon it due to heat issues or other problems that I cannot remember. I guess they must have decided to go with discreet cores and very fast interconnectors similar to the muti-core cpus from Intel?

    Anyway if it is going to work viva la speed!
     
  12. macrumors 603

    nuckinfutz

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2002
    Location:
    Middle Earth
    #12
    It's all about shrinking the fab process. I remember Intel and AMD struggling at 65nm but now at least Intel seems to have their engineering down pat.

    I'm a bit concerned about IGP integration because Intel has been so abysmal at delivering good graphics performance.

    AVX looks good. 256-bit and additional instructions should deliver a marked increase in some areas. Sandy Bridge seems to be parlaying Intel's know how in L3 technology and bringing it to consumers. It's interesting to see how the L2 caches have grown and then shrunk depending on the CPU design.
     
  13. macrumors 603

    chrmjenkins

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Location:
    CA
    #13
    Don't worry, it will get hairy again when they start looking at sub-22nm tech.
     

Share This Page