Third company could claim the "iPhone" trademark

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Jan 15, 2007.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    #1

    [​IMG]

    Category: Apple Hardware
    Link: Third company could claim the "iPhone" trademark
    Description:: Since Apple revealed its long-awaited mobile phone which uses the "iPhone" trademark, all the IT-centric web is talking about Cisco's lawsuit against Apple over the use of this trademark, which the networking giant claims to own. But a report MacScoop has obtained pointed us in the direction of another company which appears to be the actual legitimate owner of the highly desired "iPhone" trademark.

    Posted on MacBytes.com
    Approved by Mudbug
     
  2. macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #2
    So could this mean that they both lose it since neither defended their trade mark when the other got it?
     
  3. macrumors 6502

    jonharris200

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Location:
    London, UK
    #3
    1. Well first of all the trademark is "Vision I-Phone" not just "I-Phone".
    2. Second, the letter I is capitalised.
    3. And third, there's a hyphen "-" in between "I" and "Phone".

    So if this company pursues a claim to "iPhone", Apple's lawyers will probably have a field day.
     
  4. Guest

    calculus

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    #4
    There's also the Rastafarian version the 'I and I phone'.
     
  5. macrumors 65816

    lord patton

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Location:
    Chicago
    #5
    they should just call it the apple phone (you know, the phone?)
     
  6. macrumors 65816

    joecool85

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    Location:
    Maine
    #6
    I agree completely. I think that iPhone sounds kinda childish anyway, apple phone is good. And it would match apple tv's naming scheme.
     
  7. Ish
    macrumors 68000

    Ish

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Location:
    UK
    #7
    I'd been thinking that too.

    By the way, can you remind me how to make that Apple symbol? I used to know but I've forgotten. Couldn't find it on the Character Palette. Thanks.
     
  8. macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #8
    It is option+shift+k
     
  9. macrumors 68020

    aricher

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Location:
    Chi-il
    #9
    LOL :)

    Am I the only one who thinks that using the  symbol next to a product name looks strange and vaguely tacky?
     
  10. iN8
    macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 29, 2002
    Location:
    The Bahamas
    #10
    LOL

    Yes I an' I.
     
  11. Ish
    macrumors 68000

    Ish

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Location:
    UK
    #11

    Ahh! Thnk you!
     
  12. macrumors regular

    jephrey

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2005
    #12
    ?Phone makes sense, especially releasing the ?TV. Plus, it's a short matter of time before the "i" is old hat.

    J
     
  13. macrumors regular

    Rychiar

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Location:
    Waterbury, CT
    #13
    id like em to stick a hard drive in and just call it the iPod. that would solve all my problems. 8 gigs of flash half full with software and other stuff is not gonna make me stop carryin my 60 gig ipod photo:rolleyes:
     
  14. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK
    #14
    What software? :mad:
     
  15. macrumors 68000

    Shadow

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Location:
    Keele, United Kingdom
    #15
    There are too many 'i'Things. It was alright when it was just, but now everyone is 'on the iBandwagon'.
     
  16. macrumors 65816

    Flynnstone

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Location:
    Cold beer land
    #16
    It is running OS X. So you could call it ...

    mc Phone !
     
  17. macrumors 6502a

    Erendiox

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Location:
    Brooklyn NY
    #17
    The whole I - Prefix thing has been apple's thing for a long time now. Seems to me like any company that claims a name like that is either, 1. Trying to give apple a hard time, or 2. Naming one of their products in such a way that people will think it's from apple and therefore will sell better. Neither reason is acceptable business practice IMO.
     
  18. macrumors G4

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #18
    If anything this weakens Cisco's case, since they now have to fight off two companies instead of one.

    I'm tired of iProducts anyway...it's so 1998. They should have called it the Apple Phone. Nice and simple.
     

Share This Page