Thunderbolt Adoption Reportedly Slowed by Intel's Licensing and Certification, But Improvements Coming

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jan 15, 2013.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    Last July, Ars Technica took a look at the state of the Thunderbolt standard developed by Apple and Intel, noting that adoption remained slow amid high pricing some eighteen months after the standard's introduction. The report did, however, suggest that pricing could begin to improve in 2013 as the next generation of Thunderbolt chips hit the market.

    Ars Technica has now published a follow-up report looking at how things have changed over the past six months, pointing to a number of improvements such as slightly lower pricing on Thunderbolt cables from Apple, the introduction of the first wave of optical cables supporting the standard, and the launch of new docking stations and other peripherals taking advantage of Thunderbolt.

    The report indicates that the biggest holdup to wider adoption of Thunderbolt appears to be Intel's licensing and certification process, with the company dedicating only limited resources to helping third-party vendors bring their Thunderbolt products to market.
    Ziller indicated that Intel would be broadening its efforts this year, suggesting that more Thunderbolt products may be able to make their way into consumers' hands. Combining those efforts with continued cost drops and the first moves into Windows machines, Apple and Intel are undoubtedly hoping that 2013 will finally see Thunderbolt turn the corner.

    Article Link: Thunderbolt Adoption Reportedly Slowed by Intel's Licensing and Certification, But Improvements Coming
     
  2. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Location:
    Germany
    #2
    Hurry up! I want reasonably priced hard-drives, docks and adapters!
     
  3. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    #3
    Thunderbolt has been an abject failure to this point. Bytes from this article indicate that it will continue to be available exclusively at the professional price point for the foreseeable future.
     
  4. macrumors G3

    roadbloc

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    #4
    Meh. Its probably too late for Thunderbolt to be adopted at a large scale. USB 3, despite not being as good, is backward compatible to the many many many USB 2 + 1 devices out there.

    I'm not buying new peripherals, I'll stick to USB.
     
  5. macrumors 68030

    CylonGlitch

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Location:
    SoCal
    #5
    It all depends on when low priced chips hit the market. The article indicates 2013 should be that year. That, to me, means that 2014 should be when Thunderbolt hits it's stride if it is going to be successful or not. Remember USB took several years before it actually took off.
     
  6. macrumors regular

    OddyOh

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Location:
    Regina, SK, Canada
    #6
    What a joke. This should be their top priority. Nah, just let it die on the vine.
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2011
    #7
    All Thunderbolt needs is an adapter so it can accept a signal from HDMI, VGA, and/or DVI.
     
  8. macrumors 6502

    wilsonlaidlaw

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2008
    #8
    Make it an open standard

    These manufacturers have STILL not learnt that the way to maximise take up and income is to make Thunderbolt an open standard. Intel would still have a technical lead and many more would be buying their chips to make items, without having to go through the no doubt tedious and lengthy and trap strewn path of certification.
     
  9. macrumors 68030

    needfx

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    Location:
    macrumors apparently
    #9
    meh

    if it cheapens, we won't covet it
     

    Attached Files:

  10. macrumors regular

    HiVolt

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    #10
    FireWire v2.0

    Superior to USB, expensive devices/cables.
     
  11. macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    #11
    Generally, Thunderbolt is used to supply/product video signal; not accept it. Video outbound from the GPU is what it is designed for. "Accept" is the wrong direction.

    Folks could do data captures from a HDMI/VGA/DVI source but again that transformation would be done inside the peripheral and the result just PCI-e data traffic; no additional adapter required.
     
  12. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    #12
    Unfortunately thunderbolt is likely going to fizzle away. The price is just a major deterrent. I hope I eat my words because the possibilities are tremendous and it would be a shame to not take advantage of it. For the time being, I'll stick to USB 3.
     
  13. John.B, Jan 15, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2013

    macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    Location:
    Holocene Epoch
    #13
    Thunderbolt is a prosumer-level technology, it's not designed to be a USB replacement. It's effectively a PCI-e bus extension. If you don't need what that offers then a USB 3.0 external drive might be all you ever need.
     
  14. Stella, Jan 15, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2013

    macrumors 603

    Stella

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Canada
    #14
    I look at all those cheap USB3 drives.. and then look at the cost of Thunderbolt drives. Sigh. Not as if I can plugin a USB3 drive and get the full benefit...

    Thunderbolt will never be mainstream.. its another firewire - but less popular still.

    Apple - "One cable to rule them all".. well, its not going to happen.
     
  15. macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    #15
    boo-hoo Intel can't help the vast majority of the industry doing their "homework". This is more indicative of the deep and pervasive lack of innovation and creativity of the PC market. A few vendors have high margins to do sensible R&D and the large majority sit back and just copy-cat the technology after it is commoditized for them.

    'Quality versus Quantity' is a reasonable strategy for Intel to take given that Thunderbolt isn't trying to take over the whole market for sockets ("the one socket to rule them all.").

    Cheaply shielded USB 3.0 sockets causing interference problems won't kill off USB 3.0 because it can leverage the deeply entrenched USB 2.0 interia. The same problem for Thunderbolt likely would have been a larger momentum killer than this tactic of helping a limited few to lay the foundation for future expansion.
     
  16. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    #16
    In response to the news post article....no ****.

    It'll continue to be slow/non-existent until the license price MATCHES USB 3.0.
     
  17. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    #17
    As most have already point out, PRICE is the reason its not being adopted - not Intel's licensing or certification.
     
  18. macrumors demi-god

    AustinIllini

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #18
    Intel licensing and certification increases the price?
     
  19. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2008
    Location:
    Suwanee, GA
    #19
    I have a 2011 iMac and a 2011 MacBook Air. A Thunderbolt dock or adapter is the ONLY way I can get to USB 3.0. I anticipate buying one this year if they ever get to market. Right now, the Belkin product, even at $299, would meet my requirements best.

    I think Intel isn't pushing Thunderbolt until more PC manufacturers get up to speed on it. And, they are building USB 3.0 into their CPUs and system chips. Intel seems pretty schizo to me.
     
  20. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    #20
    One of the reasons the price is so high is because of intel. Their fees on Thunderbolt are crazy. Whilst there aren't official numbers, unofficial sources have on multiple occasions quoted prices between $70 and $100 - just on the license.
     
  21. macrumors 68030

    TallManNY

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    #21
    I just ordered an external hard drive for backup purposes mainly. It is a firewire drive. That is fast enough for my purposes, way cheaper than thunderbolt and I've got a free firewire slot. USB 3 might be good enough as well, but my USB ports are always jammed with loads of other stuff, including a hub. But the hub is not ideal either for a gaming peripheral, nor does it produce sufficient juice to recharge my iPad.

    I looked at thunderbolt. But why pay $100+ more when firewire is very fast. Certainly makes no difference for a time machine backup and a little dead storage for old games.

    By the way, I love the new charger on my iPhone 5. Being able to easily slot the charger in either way is such a nice improvement over USB and the 30 pin charger. Yes, for now it is not worth it to give up on the ubiquitous of those connectors. But in two years the new charger will still work great and I will have plenty of connectors of that type floating around my house.
     
  22. macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    #22
    If "cheaper" is the primary, almost singular, value metric then there never was a contest.

    Drives are a relatively poor use of Thunderbolt. It is largely transport of data from a single interface (e.g. SATA). If it is just SATA traffic that needs to be moved then it is extremely likely that using SATA directly will always be cheaper.

    Use of the wrong tool for the wrong job is highly unlikely to be cheaper.




    Depends. If laptops continue to expand their dominance over the general PC market then Thunderbolt will get value added traction. As a standard docking port it has much higher potential than primarily tasked as a direct attached storage interface. It can be used for storage that can't be the primary mission.



    Only some kool-aid sellers actually pushed that. Even Intel isn't trying to sell that kool-aid anymore. Thunderbolt was never designed to be "only port". Frankly, it seems like it was just one TB specific marketing group trying to jumpstart TB used the "one port" spin to deflect from TB being 'yet-another-proprietary' connector vibe that would impede its launch. It was always designed as an aggregator of ports. 'Aggregate' doesn't necessarily lead to 'only'. Very often it just moves multiple ports somewhere else; not eliminate them.
     
  23. Stella, Jan 15, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2013

    macrumors 603

    Stella

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Canada
    #23
    More likely the fact that the industry doesn't think that thunderbolt will benefit customers... existing technologies suffice and are better supported.

    That quote actually came from Apple.. specifically Steve Jobs, in a keynote speech.

    EDIT: the quote was actually "one connector to rule them all".
     
  24. macrumors 68040

    Dwalls90

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2009
    #24
    Once it becomes more mainstream this will take over ... as long as price comes down too.

    Thunderbolt can do everything USB can do, much faster, with greater functionality (displays, external GPUs, daisy chaining).
     
  25. macrumors 6502a

    Pentad

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    Location:
    Indiana
    #25
    It's dead...let it die. With the improvements coming to USB3, there is no reason to adopt TB for a majority of hardware vendors. USB3 is cheap, fast, getting faster, and supports waaaaay more devices than the handful of TB items out there.

    We can ship TB to the Island of Misfit Technologies where it can run and play with OpenDoc, Pippin, Taligent, Pink, and Copland.


    -P
     

Share This Page