if apple was serious the could choose to do business elsewhere but their greed dosent allow that
It's funy how when a company is suxesful on their busines, it's because they are greedy according to some "genious" brains.
if apple was serious the could choose to do business elsewhere but their greed dosent allow that
Steve changed the world with his vision of computing giving even 3rd world countries the opportunities to own a smart phone. I think that's charity enough.
Only his book. He was definitely not into philantrophy! He was somewhat ok for other people giving away money, but not him.
But it's his decision what to do with his money. When you give to charity for lets say starving people in africa.....usualy that money is spent to buy weapons by militia.
... An iPhone (or any smart phone ) is useless to a third world country, period.
How do you know he donated little to charity. Just because he wasn't public about it doesn't mean it didn't happen.
There's actually a lot of work going on to introduce 'basic' smartphones and supporting infrastructure to third world countries (especially in Africa) where they're playing an important role in development, for example by allowing farmers to monitor extreme weather conditions and market prices etc. There's also healthcare issues, allowing remote communities to access and exchange information about disease. I'm not saying you need an iPhone for this, but access to the Internet is a powerful enabler in developing countries and with unreliable electricity supplies, a basic smartphone is the most effective way of bringing connectivity to most communities and individuals.
I'm the last one to defend Jobs in any way...but do we have a public record of his private charitable donations, if any?
His public policies at Apple were not supportive of charitable giving, but I don't know about any private philanthropy.
Do you have that information??
Ok, does anyone else think it's odd that the charity is for justice and human rights when Apple gets a lot of it's stuff from China, who is one of the wort violators of Human Rights?
I gave it a good run, but it quickly left my price range. (And I don't even drink coffee. I would have been satisfied with some OJ and a game of Letterpress.
Doubt Steve would have ever done this considering how little he donated to charity.
Somewhat off topic, but why would they introduce an app in this fashion?PasswordBox.com - PasswordBox is a secure password management app which is currently restricted to VIP members only and is available on a wait list basis. Its CEO and co-founder is Daniel Robichaud.
really ? 100.000 dollars to have a coffee with tim cook.
well yea it's for charity, but people that have the kind of money like that, it must've been easy for them to ask their assistant to arrange a meet / chat with any CEO or maybe even leaders of the world.
I don't understand how the bidders have so much money that they can part with $100K and not feel it.
Those names are not associated with earth shattering fortunes or dynasties. LIke that guy from password box.com
How do they have so much $$$?
Charity aside, $180,000 for up to one hour with TC while he pretends to be interested in what you have to say doesn't sound like a very good deal to me.
And it's not like he's going to divulge information on Apple's internal workings or plans...
I gave it a good run, but it quickly left my price range. (And I don't even drink coffee. I would have been satisfied with some OJ and a game of Letterpress.
Only for the first few years. Plus they gave him a private jet during that time. And he was still CEO and majority owner of Pixar.
But I do believe that he gave privately.
It's genius.
Meet with Tim Cook, use it as a business expense (either donation, or business meeting), 100% tax deductible = FREE
I would suggest that not all charitable giving ends up buying weapons for militia. I don't think the Red Cross is buying a lot of AK-47's, as one of many examples.
I really don't care if Jobs was philanthropical or not...I agree that his money was his to do with as he saw fit.. I was wondering how anyone knew of his private behavior. Not having read the biography, I wasn't aware that it was discussed therein, as you say.
Charitable donations are claimed back on tax, so it doesn't really cost in the long run.
Despite being a singular voice, this is precisely what I did in 2010.But since you feel so strongly about this issue, it would be a great idea to contact Apple, as well as Samsung, Sony, LG, Lenovo, HTC, Amazon, and Microsoft to voice your concerns.
I assume you give away 100% of your money. Because it doesn't really cost in the long run.
Your logic and vitriol baffles me, but that seems to be a regular occurrence here.