To Serif or not to Serif?

Discussion in 'Design and Graphics' started by ezekielrage_99, Jul 5, 2009.

  1. macrumors 68040

    ezekielrage_99

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    #1
    Well I am in the process of putting together a proposal as a part of a branding overhaul for a new company. The logo concept is still very much in the infancy stage of the concept, but the company has a pretty good idea what they want but thought a bit of testing would be in order...

    The main query about the logo is to do with font choice, serif/san-serif or if anyone else has some ideas (anything overlooked).

    *Please bare in mind the "keming" isn't great because this is a quick mock-up.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. macrumors 68020

    spillproof

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #2
    San-serif is more modern. Is your "homestyling" modern? I do like 1 and 3's "Y" in "my" nonetheless.

    You could check with magazines and/or websites that deal with home styling to see what they use then use something different form the majority to grab people's attention
     
  3. thread starter macrumors 68040

    ezekielrage_99

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    #3
    The organisation is a home styling web based company, it is a specialised services that creates high-end interior designs.

    Although the specified branding direction is specified to be professional, high class, luxury and with focus on typography like with Vogue, D&G and Bvlgari logos.

    It's the mixing traditional with the "classic" design in the most simplified way is tricky...
     
  4. macrumors 68020

    Cabbit

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Location:
    Scotland
    #4
    Always like sans serf better, but that is mainly because i can follow sans serf without the letters jumping.
    But my other input her is that #1 looks much more modern that the others and home styling magazines and such are usually a sans serf font as it looks more modern unless they are covering old designs in that issue and that is where they have a serf design.

    Perhaps take this into consideration that the client could have both designs available depending on the product category.
     
  5. Guest

    Joined:
    Location:
    New Zealand
  6. macrumors regular

    bbeers

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland
    #6
    sans

    I would have to say the san-serif especially if you are dealing with high end interior designs. It feels much more modern and I really like the juxtaposition and balance it gets from the serif "my".
     
  7. thread starter macrumors 68040

    ezekielrage_99

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    #7
    I'm considering that maybe the case but it's a really good idea anyway, having classic and modern branding would be rather cool.
     
  8. macrumors 68040

    Unspoken Demise

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Location:
    >9,000
    #8
    I think an interent based site with "high end" quality needs #2 more. 1 and 3 seem very personable, like its "my" as in mine, like we can take ownership and pride in it as our own, as in a modern way as previously suggested, but for "high end interior design," I think #2 represents them better.

    2 cents.
     
  9. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    #9
    You might try a font like Helvetica Neue (which you might be in #1)... try to vary the weight between HOME and STYLING... I like the "styling" in 1 but the heavier "home" in 2, but, in general, I'd use the sans-serif fonts ...
     
  10. macrumors 68030

    benthewraith

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Location:
    Miami, FL
  11. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    #11
    I am not a designer, but I have an opinion.

    Prefer "Homestyling" in number 3. I like the horizontal lines created by the serifs, much better than the curves on the serifs in number 2 that interrupt my reading. I feel like I am tripping over each character.

    Something strange happening with the "s" in number 2. It is very narrow, and I can't stop looking at it.

    Number 1 just feels too locked into modern styling. Number 3 feels more versatile.

    Of the "my"s, I guess I like number 2, but it doesn't speak to me in any special way. It would be nice to see more options on it.
     
  12. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Location:
    Marin County (where else?)
    #12
    No Zaphino

    Please, no zaphino. You can spot it a mile away. What about Rotis (serif) with a Rotis semi-sans or sans? I might also recommend Bodoni italics.
     
  13. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    #13
    Try it in a san serif font that has some styling - Try Optima

    Don't use Helvetica Neue or DIN - they are being used to death.
     
  14. macrumors 65816

    SwiftLives

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2001
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    #14
    Combine them?
    Mix a serif and a sans.

    And maybe play with contrasting the weights of the words, too.
     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    bluetooth

    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto
    #15
    I really like the "HOMESTYLING" sans font in number 1. I also like where you are headed with the contrasting font style of "my" but not sure if that particular font flows best. I think the "HOMESTYLING" sans font has an elegant, contemporary/modern feel which is perfect for the interior design concept. I take it this is going to be a logotype?
     
  16. macrumors 601

    jecapaga

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Location:
    Southern California
    #16
    Any time you're using three different type treatments just in a simple logo you're inviting crap in my opinion. Essentially you have three going on already no matter if you choose serif or sans. I prefer the sans though.
     
  17. macrumors 68020

    Heb1228

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Location:
    Virginia Beach, VA
  18. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Location:
    USA
  19. macrumors member

    ianogden

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Location:
    London
  20. thread starter macrumors 68040

    ezekielrage_99

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    #20
    I'll make a few more mock-ups with the suggestions (thanks).

    Overall I am staying away from Helvetica although a very nice font it really "doesn't look right" in this context, Optima another one which would look good in tight type may also be an option.

    For the moment it's narrowed down to 3 fonts:
    - Bodoni
    - Futura LT
    - Didot

    * Option 1 was Futura LT

    * Option 2 was a very classic font Adobe Carlson Pro, and I do agree the S doen't look right. This wasn't my choice either... I was intending to mix Bodoni Script Pro and BodoniXT.

    * Option 3 was Didot
     
  21. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2006
    #21
    Its too hard to read and theres no composition to it, keep working on the artistic part of it

    The letters are too close together to be readable, and theres not enough difference between homestyling, that would help readability.

    my is messing up the composition, the eye wants to move from the top left to the bottom right when reading, its awkward to go from bottom left. If its not going to be symmetric then it needs to have flow that people can relate to naturally. If you are set on using the script font then "styling" would be better suited for it because it would drive the eye to the end, and it would further emphasize the style aspect.
     
  22. macrumors 6502a

    bluetooth

    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto
    #22
    New Century Schoolbook (serif) in an italic genreally works well as a contrast with Futura (sans) although you would need to play around with the types, perhaps to a Futura book as NCS is a little heavier and may be too far the other way. I have seen these two work well together in several examples. Food for thought if you are trying to maintain that contrast of classic script (my) and contemporary (HOMESTYLING).
     
  23. macrumors 68040

    IgnatiusTheKing

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2007
    Location:
    das Fort
    #23
    I'd go with sans. Since it's a web-based company, a modern look is probably the way to go, and #1 looks the slickest/most modern. That would be my starting point.
     
  24. thread starter macrumors 68040

    ezekielrage_99

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    #24
    Hello all, I've made a few version mainly to do with the fonts.

    Thanks again for all the good feedback.
     

    Attached Files:

  25. macrumors regular

    bbeers

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    Location:
    Maryland
    #25
    revisions

    In these versions I quite like number 1.
    The my is very familiar to me. The feeling of familiarity leaves me with some comfort and reassurance in the brand, and I can't quite explain why. After seeing the text in all lower case I really like it. The lower case serif fonts really seems to fit well to me.

    The second one with the all caps feels very "Better Homes and Garden" or Architectural Digest to me. It could just be a because of similar fonts and the all caps. I am not say that is a bad thing at all, just the immediate feeling I get when I saw the designs.

    The Third one I liked it better when it was in the light font. The kerning seems a little wide as compared to the light one. The light font felt very modern to me where as this one feels more bland. Also I am not the biggest fan of the my on the third, the weights the the two contrasting fonts feel to be too close to me.


    Just my thoughts. I must says that I do like where you are going.
     

Share This Page