Torture

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by pseudobrit, Jul 14, 2004.

  1. pseudobrit macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #1
    link

    Doing whatever it takes to stop terrorists...
     
  2. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #2
    God, it's getting so difficult to be shocked.... :(
     
  3. zimv20 macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    toronto
    #3
    what makes you think that?

    i'm sorry you feel that way, though i'm fairly certain you wouldn't want to be treated that way.

    under the geneva convention, this is clearly torture. perhaps you think the GC sets the torture bar too low.
     
  4. scem0 macrumors 604

    scem0

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    back in NYC!
    #4
    And studies have shown that torture isnt very effective in regards to getting information out of someone.

    There's just no excuse... :rolleyes:

    scem0
     
  5. pseudobrit thread starter macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #5
    The only reason to torture someone is if both:

    a) you know they don't have any valuable information (torture is counterproductive to the interrogation process)

    AND

    b) you're a sick ****ing sociopathic animal and you get off on it.

    I'm glad to see this is the image we're projecting around the world.
     
  6. pseudobrit thread starter macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #6
    What prisoners and where? I know the English were downright awful with the IRA men they've taken in the past, but AFAIK, that's no longer an issue.

    Being locked in a freezer for 14 hours is insigificant? Being kept awake for weeks? Being chained to the floor in an unnatural position that causes pain and swelling? Yeah, sounds just like those frat pranksters Rush talks about to me... :rolleyes:

    What's to gain? A book deal? This guy just wants to tell his story.

    There is no reason not to believe him yet, and since this is not the first story of its type to come out of a US "non-POW" POW camp, I've every reason to think it's accurate.
     
  7. LethalWolfe macrumors G3

    LethalWolfe

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #7
    Curious, do you have any good links? I'm interested to read up on it.


    Lethal
     
  8. pseudobrit thread starter macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #8
    It was excerpted in Harper's in '97. A link here
     
  9. Ugg macrumors 68000

    Ugg

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Location:
    Penryn
    #9
    Why are you not surprised? I am truly curious.

    Ok, what's your definition of torture.

    Why do you not believe him? We know beyond a shadow of a doubt that dozens of the prisoners in Guantanamo were guilty of nothing more than being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Yet, they were held for more than two years. So, according to your statement all of those held at Guantanamo are liars whether or not they are guilty of terrorism. Either you need to expand on your statement or retract it or fess up to your hypocrisy.
     
  10. toontra macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2003
    Location:
    London UK
    #10
    The real problem is that no-one (you, me, anyone else) knows why they are being held and why they were detained in the first place. They have been denied the most basic elements of human rights or recourse to any form of legal representation.

    That being so, you can be no surer that they are righfully being detained than others are that they are not.
     
  11. pseudobrit thread starter macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #11
    Okay, have you ever been locked in a freezer for 14 hours?

    Fair enough.

    This isn't the first accusation. That's why it's credible.

    Why wasn't he charged with a crime? It sounds to me like he was guilty of being in the wrong place at the wrong time. He was picked up by Pakistani villagers and sold to the Pakistani police. Doesn't something about that sound odd to you?

    A new tool to the American haters that we've supplied them with. The Geneva Convention disagrees with your standards for torture. What are yours? Floggings? The rack?
     
  12. Backtothemac macrumors 601

    Backtothemac

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    Location:
    San Destin Florida
    #12
    Part of training for various government agencies is learning how to be tortured. You go into it with the best intentions of not breaking, but, everyone will break eventually.

    So, if we captured Bin Laden, how would you feel about him being tortued for information that would stop attacks?
     
  13. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #13
    You wouldn't get any. Pointless.

    Anyway, it's not about "breaking" people, it's about getting information. Torture is terrorism.
     
  14. Backtothemac macrumors 601

    Backtothemac

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    Location:
    San Destin Florida
    #14
    Oh, but you will. Look, we have gotten a ton of info from Kalied Shiek Mohamad. A ton. He designed 9/11 with others, so the question still stands, even if torture is = to terrorism, if we got Bin Laden, and used torture to get info, would it be justified?

    Does the ends justify the means?
     
  15. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #15
    No.
     
  16. takao macrumors 68040

    takao

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2003
    Location:
    Dornbirn (Austria)
    #16
    hm i had lessons/courses about handling POWs,illegal imigrant etc. during my conscription service... which lead to my assumption that _if_ turture does happen, it is intentional.period.

    one of my school comrades had a problem during his service because he didn't behave correctly with an imigrant (he used an discriminating word) and had to pay 1500 euro additional to the well known 'equipment cleaning' + weekend duty punishment..who fined him ? the imigrant...no the poor guy didn't even understand the word... the army intern justice got him into trouble...

    to flush the own democratic values based on human rights (and binding UN treaties) down the toilet, because of something like terrorism, is more dangerous than terrorism itself... what's next ?'a strong,uniting leader "doing what's need to be done" ' ?

    Stelliform: some food of thought..i rephrased one of your sentence
    "Are we supposed to believe this guy simply because he _is_ American?"


    any discussion about "right or wrong" is misplaced when talking about torture...it should be a discussion about consequences...after all even the most dangerous terrorist is still a human ...

    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.
    Oscar Wilde
     
  17. pseudobrit thread starter macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #17
    That's a hypothetical question with an outcome that is not likely. If I knew torturing bin Laden would stop another 9/11, then yes, I'd say go ahead.

    But we know that torture would not acheive this purpose because it is counterproductive to the interrogation process.

    There is a practical reason to oppose torture that overshadows any moral debate. Somehow this crap gets turned into an anti-bleeding-heart tirade, when it's really just an anti-reality tirade.
     
  18. Backtothemac macrumors 601

    Backtothemac

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    Location:
    San Destin Florida
    #18

    You are right. I just wanted some besides me to agree that if you knew it stop another 9/11 then go for it. Thanks Sec of State ;)
     
  19. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #19
    Forgive me for butting in, but he qualified his agreement out of existence. Torture seems to be more for the benefit and amusement of the torturer than for extracting useful information. I maintain that if your civilization depends on torture to survive, you've already lost.
     
  20. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #20
    That's like arguing for the death penalty in cases where the guilt is assured. It's a situation that will never happen. It's akin to solving physics problems 'in the absence of air resistance' as I did in school so often. It's tantalizingly close to a real situation, but oh so different.

    Look, if you have enough info to know that torturing bin Laden would stop another 9/11 then you already have planty of info to work with. Besides, he might lie to get you to stop tortuing him.
     

Share This Page