U2 May Turn To iTunes Music Store If Faced With Piracy

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Jul 22, 2004.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    #1
  2. macrumors 68000

    MoparShaha

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Location:
    San Francisco
    #2
    I don't understand how this is supposed to be a threat. Would they not have released it anyways on iTunes?
     
  3. macrumors G3

    iMeowbot

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    #3
    The idea is that initially the album was scheduled to be released in November, but if it appears on p2p networks they can get the real thing out to iTunes immediately, and onto CD within a few weeks. That ability to jump the few weeks' lead time is the part that's newsworthy. [The usual tack is to hold up iTMS releases until CDs are in the stores.]
     
  4. macrumors 68020

    winmacguy

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #4
    Sounds like they would have released it to stores worldwide first to maxmise revenue and then put it on iTMS however if it does showup on the web then obviously U2 will have to go straight to iTMS to counter the p2p networks distribution.
     
  5. macrumors 68040

    killmoms

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    #5
    I was under the impression that the album wasn't complete, or wasn't entirely finished—i.e. the CD stolen was not properly mastered, or not the final tracklist, or somesuch. The threat was (to my mind) that they'd release the album now, when they still didn't consider it finished, in all distribution chains, just to prove a point to the pirates. A sort of "You ruined it for everyone!" Or I could be completely off my rocker. The whole situation seems a bit ambiguous.

    --Cless
     
  6. macrumors 603

    whooleytoo

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2002
    Location:
    Cork, Ireland.
    #6
    A lot of people suspect it was a staged publicity stunt to draw attention to the impending new album, but that's probably too cynical.. ;)

    Based on this story, I'd nearly like to see it appear on P2P, just so iTunes gets it as early as possible!
     
  7. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #7
    I was under that impression also. Obviously it would be quite bad if they're forced to release it before it's actually seen as finished. It's bound to be somewhat disappointing. The sound quality might not be as good and there's also a chance that they where still working on some tracks that aren't finished yet, and they would have to settle with what they have recorded so far. In any case I don't think anybody should be happy with a early release like this.
     
  8. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Location:
    Nottingham
    #8
    Major label c**p like U2 deserve all the piracy they get, anyway. Fans will buy it if it's good enough, if not, they may hear something that sucks. And we wouldn't want that, before we've wasted our money, would we?

    Yes, I know music isn't shareware, but when they have as much backing as U2 it probably should be.
     
  9. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Location:
    Minnesota
    #9
    I hope they find whoever stole this work and execute the sorry scum! Death to all pirates.
     
  10. macrumors 68020

    bennetsaysargh

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Location:
    New York
    #10
    i hope it gets leaked. if that happens, then we get the new U2 album sooner! i can't wait. :)
     
  11. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2004
    Location:
    Missouri, USA
    #11
    P2P woes redux

    Didn't the same thing happen with Eminem's last album? I seem to recall that CD release being pushed waaaaay up because songs were leaking out over the internet, obviously without Marshall Mather's approval.

    Having access to demos is interesting, in that it shows how a song goes from idea to finished product, but that's no reason to post them before the finished product is even ready. That's just bad karma.
     
  12. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    #12
    I think the idea is that if it's available on the P2P networks then people could rationalize that they can't buy it so they're forced to illegally download it. Kind of like how people download movies that won't ever be played in a theater near them (limited distribution) and may never make it to DVD/Video.

    So by releasing it early, you don't give them that option. It seems like a weak move but in reality it's the only move. The good thing about this though is that U2 might hustle and get the the record completed faster (I mean editing etc.. not more songs in a short time).
     
  13. macrumors 6502a

    mrsebastian

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2002
    Location:
    sunny san diego
    #13
    i'd probably dl their new cd if i could, but i would out of respect for u2 buy it when available... and if this is a publicity stunt to stir hype, i'd say it's bloody brilliant!
     

Share This Page