UK Court Allows Activists to Sue Google Over Safari Tracking

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jan 16, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    A UK Court will allow a group of privacy experts to sue Google over the company's circumvention of privacy settings in Apple's Safari browser, reports Gigaom. Following this ruling, the activists can pursue a tort claim that alleges Google misused their private information. The Honourable Mr Justice Tugendhat writes in his decision:
    This case stems from Google's former practice of installing cookies in Safari even when the web browser blocked that practice. Google circumvented the browser's default privacy settings by tricking Safari into thinking a web page was a trusted page. Google did this through code embedded in its ads that made Safari think the user was submitting a form. When a user fills out a form, Safari makes an exception in its privacy policy and allows a cookie to be installed on a user's device, and Google exploited this exception to install cookies without the permission of the user.

    [​IMG]
    Google halted this practice in 2012 after it was reported by The Wall Street Journal, but consumers and regulators pursued the case through several investigations and lawsuits. The company was fined $22.5 million by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission for this privacy violation and paid a $17 million settlement in a case filed on behalf of Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia.

    Article Link: UK Court Allows Activists to Sue Google Over Safari Tracking
     
  2. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2013
    Location:
    Barcelona, Spain
    #2
    Google's going down!
     
  3. macrumors G3

    roadbloc

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    #3
    Good. Next up, everybody else who thinks its a good idea to take personal information without permission ...*COUGH*... NSA.
     
  4. macrumors 6502a

    TsunamiTheClown

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Location:
    Fiery+Cross+Reef
    #4
    I'm all for privacy, but where does this cash go?

    Why are 37 states getting paid because Google screws me?
     
  5. macrumors G5

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #5
    I admit I have little knowledge on the UK court system.

    However - my only question is - what damage occurred and is that an important metric to prove in order to win a case.
     
  6. B4U, Jan 16, 2014
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2014

    B4U
    macrumors 6502

    B4U

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2012
    #6
    Where is our share of the cash when we are the actual victims instead of some of the states and not all of them?
     
  7. macrumors 6502

    UnfetteredMind

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    #7
    I'm sure they'll get a stern talking to and some serious finger wagging! :p
     
  8. macrumors G5

    gnasher729

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    #8
    The idea is that having to pay a fine stops Google from doing it again. So the important thing is Google paying out. Who receives it is secondary.
     
  9. macrumors 68000

    Cuban Missles

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2012
    Location:
    My heart is in Camagüey, the rest in the USA
    #9
    Does anyone know if Apple has made any changes to Safari to prevent others from exploiting the same approach?
     
  10. B4U
    macrumors 6502

    B4U

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2012
    #10
    By this logic, the company that killed someone by a poor product only need to pay the government and the actual victim is only secondary? Him...don't know if I can agree to that.
     
  11. macrumors 68020

    Taz Mangus

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    #11
    Paying a fine of $22.5 million means nothing to a company like Google, like paying $10 to the average person. There is nothing about the amount that would deter them from doing something like that again. It is ironic that Google got rid of their motto "Don't be evil". Didn't Google also once use the motto "Do no harm"? My how times have changed.
     
  12. macrumors 68040

    the8thark

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    #12
    Blah blah blah Sue Google blah blah

    A good day today.
     
  13. macrumors 68040

    eastercat

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Location:
    PDX
    #13
    At least we can sue Google, unlike the NSA.
     
  14. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2007
    #14
    Have they ever lived to any of these mottos?

    Ironically enough, AFAIK your 4th amendment was included so citizens would have a safeguard against power abuse by their government. Times change.
     
  15. macrumors 65816

    dec.

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2012
    Location:
    Toronto
    #15
    The damage that I can see is the violation of privacy, knowingly as they assured the customers otherwise. While some predictably might find that fact unimportant or irrelevant, others take it very serious and imho it does say something about a company's ethic. It will be interesting to see how the court will handle this.
     
  16. macrumors G5

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #16
    No argument.
     
  17. macrumors 68020

    Taz Mangus

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    #17
    <deleted>
     
  18. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2007
    #18
    Not sure to get you…
     
  19. macrumors 68020

    Taz Mangus

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    #19
    I misread your post. That is why I deleted it after I realized that.
     
  20. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2007
    #20
    Oh, ok.
     
  21. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2014
    #21
    I can't see how there could be damage done unless there's a law dictating it or there's an argument that Google causes other problems like business losses in some odd situations, but it makes sense for the States to collect fines for spying.

    But… I don't care if a bunch of extra costs are pinned on Google.

    ----------

    Alright, enough copying and pasting this on every article about Google. That's like complaining that the cops get to use cell phones in their cars and run red lights while on duty.
     
  22. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2007
    #22
    NSA duties do not include mass-spying of each and every non-US-citizen data that transit on US soil. They are greatly overstepping their duties and in other times, the agency would have been dissolved and its key people sued and imprisoned.
     
  23. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2014
    #23
    "The NSA is tasked with the global monitoring, collection, decoding, translation and analysis of information and data for foreign intelligence and counterintelligence purposes, including surveillance of targeted individuals on U.S. soil."

    Sounds like it's their job.
     
  24. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2007
    #24
    Why would every netizen be targeted? Everyone is guilty, until proven innocent. Sounds like paranoia to me.
     
  25. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2014
    #25
    Do you know that every citizen is targeted? There's no proof. I seriously doubt it, considering that at least one person would be needed to track and analyze all the data that one person sends. Perhaps some data from everyone is collected but not looked at unless needed. And anyway, why would you care about that? Ironic that you mention paranoia… we're talking terrorist plots vs. your sense of perfect and complete privacy.
     

Share This Page