[UPDATE]Terrorist Attack kills 35 people at Moscow Airport

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by quagmire, Jan 24, 2011.

  1. quagmire, Jan 24, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2011

    macrumors 603

    quagmire

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    #1
    A suicide bomber set off a shrapnel filled explosive in a crowed area in Moscow Airport. The blast killed 35 and injured 152.

    http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/europe/01/24/russia.airport.explosion/index.html?hpt=T1&iref=BN1
     
  2. macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #2
    Makes you wonder what the point of bottled water bans, strip search machines and molestations by TSA agents are if all you have to do is strap a bomb to yourself and blow yourself up at the crowded baggage claim.
     
  3. macrumors 68020

    Peterkro

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Location:
    Communard de Londres
    #3
    ^^ It wasn't at baggage claim,it was in the arrivals hall,thus not airside.
     
  4. thread starter macrumors 603

    quagmire

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    #4
    Even baggage claim isn't in an area where you have to go through security.
     
  5. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    #5
    things are about to get real bad for muslims in that area.

    russians and chinese dont play nice when it comes to terrorism.
     
  6. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    #6
    Many people enjoy a false sense of security in places where they feel threatened (like on an airplane). People don't logically access the actual threats in their life. Getting in a car crash, choking on a piece of steak, falling down the stairs, etc. Instead people dwell on the exceptionally unlikely possibility of being killed in a terrorist attack so they welcome the SENSE of security that invasive security checks provide.
     
  7. macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #7
    Ah, OK. I'm used to STL where arrivals and baggage claim are almost the same thing since it's not a huge international airport.

    The point stands though - if this wasn't airside, how long until you have to go through security just to go to arrivals to pick somebody up at the airport?
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    #8
    Lord, I hope they don't start invading Arab nations willy nilly :rolleyes:
     
  9. macrumors 68020

    Peterkro

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Location:
    Communard de Londres
    #9
    I may be wrong,although as far as I remember all the international airports I've been to baggage claim is only accessible to passengers and is before customs usually considered airside.
     
  10. quagmire, Jan 24, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2011

    thread starter macrumors 603

    quagmire

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    #10
    When I drive to Orlando International Airport and Washington Dulles, I can go to baggage claim without going through security. International passengers have their own separated area that is still airside, but not so for domestic passengers.

    With this attack, I bet that will change pretty shortly.
     
  11. macrumors 68020

    Peterkro

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Location:
    Communard de Londres
    #11
    It appears I am wrong,seems like a rather large security hole.

    I picked up someone else's backpack at LAX,it took considerable effort and showing of passport,boarding pass etc to go back and get the right one.
     
  12. macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #12
    Well, I think it depends on international vs domestic. I do remember baggage claim at ORD for international arrivals being in a secure, airside area before customs (and I had to claim and re-check my bag for my connecting domestic flight). I've never flown to ORD as a destination, but I assume domestic baggage claim it elsewhere.

    I guess the question is whether this bomb went off at the international or domestic arrivals area. If it's international, then how did he get in there? Did he board a flight with it, or just run to the exit from outside the airport and blow himself up.
     
  13. macrumors G5

    leekohler

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Location:
    Chicago, Illinois
    #13
    God, that's awful. Has any group claimed responsibility yet?
     
  14. thread starter macrumors 603

    quagmire

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    #14
    Yeah, international arrivals have their own separated secure area. But, domestic arrivals don't.

    I edited my post mentioning that, but too slow for you two. :eek:
     
  15. macrumors demi-god

    LethalWolfe

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #15
    In contrast, most of the airports I've been to have baggage claim 'outside' of security. Even if you screen people before they go into baggage claim from the outside what's to stop someone from pulling into the 'pick up' lane just outside of baggage claim and blowing themselves up?

    LAX, for example, has like 7 or 8 terminals that are totally stand alone so it's not like they have any choke points to easily add additional security stations (unless you check everyone and their car before they enter the airport.


    Lethal

    EDIT: International arrivals are usually sealed off but domestic are not.
     
  16. macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #16
    Exactly. You can keep moving the security checkpoint closer to the airport entrance, but as long as you have that bottleneck, you're going to have a large number of people in a small area.
     
  17. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    #17
    religion of islam.
     
  18. thread starter macrumors 603

    quagmire

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    #18
    Death toll raised to 35 people killed and 152 injured. Original post has been updated.
     
  19. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    #19
    Source?
    Reason?
     
  20. arkitect, Jan 24, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2011

    macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    #20
    Oh, really? So you have some insider information that currently none of the news agencies (or Russian government) have?
    Care to share?

    While "rebels" may be suspected there has been no confirmation.

    Your stuck record is truly grating.
     
  21. macrumors G5

    leekohler

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Location:
    Chicago, Illinois
    #21
    We have no evidence of that as of yet.
     
  22. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    #22
    Oh, good. I was seriously worried there. Now I see that he is just blowing smoke.
     
  23. arkitect, Jan 24, 2011
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2011

    macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    #23
    He does anything else? :confused:

    Dagestan or Chechnya probably is the reason behind the bombing, but for anyone to automatically jump to a gloating conclusion that religion of islam is behind it is just ***** up.
     
  24. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    #24
    Haven't lurked long enough to know him. My bad.
     
  25. macrumors 68020

    freeny

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Location:
    Location: Location:
    #25
    Ah, I assume they were "Bush haters"...
     

Share This Page