USB 3.0 to Be Unveiled on November 17th

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Nov 6, 2008.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    #1
  2. macrumors P6

    dukebound85

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Location:
    5045 feet above sea level
    #2
    reason enough for me to hold off on getting a new laptop

    5Gbits/sec wow
     
  3. macrumors G3

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    #3
    And elsewhere it says that it won't be finished until next year and products only in 2010.
     
  4. macrumors 65816

    MasterNile

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    #4
    Sources for this?
     
  5. macrumors G3

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    #5
    That's the timing for the specification that appeared anywhere you looked at for USB3.

    tgdaily just published an article today. The November event is a "first detailed look at the specification" for hardware developers.
     
  6. macrumors 68000

    echeck

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2004
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    #6
    I probably just didn't look hard enough, but I couldn't find if it's using the same connector or will it be new?

    I still think if Firewire 800 could have used the same connector as 400 it would have been more widely used.
     
  7. macrumors 65816

    MasterNile

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    #7
    the first 5-6 google responses for usb 3.0 say 2009 or 2010 for USB 3.0 products, which to me means anywhere from 2 months to 2 years, but 1 year 2 months to 2 years 1 month (beginning of 2010 to end of 2010) seems to be on the outside of the estimate and I didn't find any sources (true it was just a quick search but still...) that said it was completely out of the question for USB 3.0 products to be released in 2009
     
  8. Moderator emeritus

    mkrishnan

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Location:
    Grand Rapids, MI, USA
    #8
    It's kind of complicated...

    http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/01/09/ces_usb_3_revealed/

    Basically, the system is fully backwards compatible (like USB2 systems can use USB 1.x devices) but not forwards compatible (AFAICS, the USB3 male plugs cannot be inserted into USB 1-2 female ports), for electrical USB connections. There also appears to be a forthcoming USB3 optical connector, about which I don't know too much.

    So it'll be a better situation than FW800 -- you'll be able to plug your USB2 devices into your USB3 ports, and you won't need more than one kind of USB port. But you won't be able to use USB3 devices at step-down functionality level on USB2 computers.
     
  9. macrumors G3

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    #9
    If it's a first look, it's a draft, not a finished specification.

    Tektronix is the first provider of test tools for USB3 and they are expecting consumer products for 2010.
     
  10. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2008
    #10
    should be interesting
     
  11. macrumors 601

    themoonisdown09

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Location:
    Georgia, USA
    #11
    This is probably why Apple dropped the FireWire off of the Macbooks. They don't want people to use FireWire anymore so that when USB 3.0 comes out, all the devices will use that as a standard.
     
  12. macrumors regular

    bengal85

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Location:
    USA
    #12
    WOW 3.0 I going to be amazing I just hope that we can still use 2.0 flash drives because I don't want to pay to replace my 4 2.0's for 3.0 I mean I put a lot of money into getting those
     
  13. macrumors 604

    MacsRgr8

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #13
    Doesn't make sense to drop FireWire now if you don't have USB 3.0 yet.
    When all HD cameras and high speed external hard drives come out with USB 3.0 support, you still won't be able to use it on the current MacBook.
     
  14. macrumors regular

    macnerd77

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Location:
    Northern California / Bay Area
    #14
    Unless Apple Some how has already got usb 3.0 in the Macbook and it is just not enabled. It would not surprise me to see apple do something like this.
     
  15. macrumors G3

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    #15
    With a magical old connector and an unfinished specification?
     
  16. macrumors 601

    t0mat0

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Home
    #16
    Hmm WUSB, and USB 3, alongside FW update too - I wonder if any of these would actually hit WWDC announced Macs?
     
  17. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2007
    #17
    I kind hope they change the shape of the connector.. im forever trying to plug in usb cables the wrong way round when plugging things in at the back or side of the computer without looking. Normal usb connectors just arent keyed very well
     
  18. macrumors 6502a

    mattwolfmatt

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2008
    #18
    By the time USB 3.0 comes out (2010 probably) you can get a 32GB flash drive for $50. I was recently tempted to get a 16GB one for $80 at Office Max.

    Side bar...is there a ceiling on the capacity of those things (flash drives)? I remember being excited about a 128MB one I got for $40 in 2002. Six years later $40 buys you 16GB, or 56 times as big. Will we see 128GB someday in flashdrives? 16TB? 1PB? Am I being ridiculous?
     
  19. macrumors 68000

    ltldrummerboy

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    #19
    Theoretically, will it be possible to use target disk mode between two Macs with USB 3.0?
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    ozziegn

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Location:
    Central FL Area
    #20
    then you'll be waiting quite a while because it ain't happening anytime soon.

    life's too short to be waiting. get a new laptop now and enjoy it now. you can always sell it later.
     
  21. macrumors 601

    DMann

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2002
    Location:
    10023
    #21
    This is hopeful, certainly possible, and would indeed be quite awesome. If not, then a port upgrade would be a welcomed solution.

    Not at all - PMC memory - Programmable Metallization Cell memory, or nano-ionic memory, has been developed to counteract the physical limits of current memory storage technology. PMC will be a 1,000 times more efficient than existing flash memory and will exponentially increase the memory capacities of USB drives, digital cameras, laptops and MP3 players. It won't be long before we see products incorporating the new technology. (6-8 months) PMC has attracted interest from several memory vendors, including Micron Technology, Samsung, Sony and IBM. I'm greatly looking forward to 4TB USB memory sticks, which will likely be far more reliable for media backup than current solid state flash memory is.
     
  22. macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #22
    hhmm this is very interesting!

    at the current rate of HD's i dont really see this as a positive, as they are limited by the actual HD's themselves.

    for flash drives and the like it will be absolutely awsome! i wonder what the actual throughput of it will be like, i can't wait to see actual testing of it compared to fw800,1600 & 3200.

    havent read anything about how USB3's CPU usage is or anything, i am awaiting the results though!!!!
     
  23. macrumors 68030

    Analog Kid

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    #23
    Please tell me USB3 isn't all CPU controlled, like previous versions of USB. To my mind, that's one of the biggest advantages of FireWire...
     
  24. macrumors regular

    bengal85

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Location:
    USA
    #24
    Yeah I dont think there is even a PB size yet
     
  25. macrumors 68000

    ltldrummerboy

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    #25
    To put it in perspective, Facebook has about one PB of pictures stored on their servers. Imagine carrying every single one of those pictures with you on a thumbdrive. Not going to happen anytime soon.

    I would still like to know if target disk mode is possible between two computers with USB 3.0.
     

Share This Page