*Edit*
Two things I "confirmed" via T wireless rep:
1. They can be talked into reducing the $36 fee to $18 (I've gotten them to drop the $18 fee in the past when that was the cap).
2. They claimed to me that this had to do with the cost of the devices per se going up.
My take-aways:
1. When iPhone (whatever) comes out later this year, I'm going to nicely ask for a reduction in fee or a credit to offset.
2. Since their story over the fee is so general and vague, there's no use in getting into a fight with them (hence point 1).
3. If ARPU is not going down over iPhones, and margins aren't changing to procure the device by T, then why essentially require a second revenue stream?
There *is* major subsidy going on with the telecoms; see here, here, here, and here. Very much explains why Dan Hesse (sp?) over at Sprint had some 'splainin' to do with their board.
Unlike how Nokia and, admittedly, Apple handled the recent Lumia 900 data connection issue, the carriers really ought to simply be up front about the fee instead of couching it in so many general and vague terms.