Viruses catch up to the Mac

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, May 1, 2006.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    #1
  2. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2003
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio area
    #2
    sheesh

    This is the virus/trojan that we saw WEEKS AGO. Yesterday this story started to appear on web sites, and now it's on Fox, CNN, etc. This is OLD NEWS. Someone out there really wants to make Apple look bad and it really ticks me off.
     
  3. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2003
    #3
    You can't expect a big media gun like CNN to actually do some simple research before writing an article can you?

    Sadly, they probably did a story on it two months ago when it was actually news to some people.

    My first thought was wondering if somehow a Windows virus had used Boot Camp to invade OSX. Now I'm dumb like CNN! :p
     
  4. macrumors member

    wedge antilies

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Location:
    Adelaide, Australia, MAAAATE!
    #4
    Here We Go Again....

    Maybe the article should be called "Under-researched hype catches up to the media.":rolleyes:
     
  5. macrumors 65816

    GilGrissom

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    #5
    Ye. As soon as the news first appeared way back my Security Technology lecturer came up to me and said that viruses are coming thick and fast to the Mac now (knowing I use Macs!) and that it's more unsecure now than Windows, because now people are actually bothering about OS X. He said that his source at Security Now or something like that, had said that there are now at least 5 confirmed viruses for Mac, with more unconfirmed cases. I didn't want to seem really biassed but it was the first I heard of 5 or more confirmed viruses so he wouldn't believe me when I argued with him!

    The viruses are coming, I just hope Apple does us proud and fixes these things ASAP with minimal disruption and keeps their good security record.
     
  6. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2002
    #6
    oh cnn!!!

    With new Macs running the same processor that powers Windows-based machines, far more people will know how to exploit weaknesses in Apple machines than in the past, when they ran on the PowerPC chips made by IBM Corp. and Motorola Corp. spinoff Freescale Semiconductor Inc.

    Wow... you lean something new every day.
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    bpd115

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2003
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    #7
    CNN didn't write this story, it's an AP story and more FUD.

    *Sigh* :rolleyes:
     
  8. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2003
    Location:
    Aspen, CO
    #8
    Could this hurt Apple's gains in market share?
    It's easy to take being virus free for granted but when I tell PC users about this little known fact their eyes jump out of their heads, this is worth the extra cost to my family members who have PCs so full of spyware I don't know where to start. I'm surprised Apple has never exploited this strength but that may have lead to a catch-22 and certainly isn't part of their image just a very effective side effect.
    Do viruses need to be written for the machine or the OS?


     
  9. macrumors 6502a

    Airforce

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    #9
    OS
     
  10. macrumors 6502a

    fixyourthinking

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    Greenville SC
    #10
    Cnn

    CNN = Computer News Ncorrect (ok bad, but wit is short this morning)

    This article is so poorly written and what 2 months ago news?

    The first sentence doesn't even make sense?

    Macs are not under attack ... nor was the "virus' that was over discussed and I think even spread by these forums even a virus, a trojan, or a proof of concept to use a couple buzz words.

    Why do editors at CNN allow this crap through?
     
  11. macrumors 6502a

    fixyourthinking

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    Greenville SC
    #11
    Few if any viruses are exploited at the processor level or actually exploit hardware ... so no.
     
  12. Moderator emeritus

    angelwatt

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Location:
    USA
    #12
    Yup, I remember subbmitting a cnn article at least a month ago about this same thing. Guess the news is getting slow that they're re-running old stories. Too bad they still don't understand what they are writing about. Oh no, Mac has 1 virus compared to windows tens of thousands, whatever shall we do.

    A virus could probably do my computer good. My virus scanner keeps complaining about how it has nothing to do. I almost feel sorry for the program. ... almost.
     
  13. macrumors 68040

    Kingsly

    #13
    Amen.
     
  14. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    #14
    Both. Sorta :p It depends how it's written. You can't expect shellcode for one arch to work on another, for example
     
  15. macrumors 65816

    BurtonCCC

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Location:
    Wheaton/Normal, IL
    #15
    What CNN isn't printing is the fact that in November of 2004, there were 53,000 Windows viruses and a new one every 18 seconds. The Mac has what, MAYBE seven? And they aren't even all viruses, they're just "vulnerabilities."

    Just another company that Bill Gates probably owns trying to take down the Apple.

    Daniel.
     
  16. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    Location:
    Arizona
    #16
    Or network access, or filesystem calls, or anything else.

    You write viruses for the OS.
     
  17. macrumors G5

    nagromme

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    #17
    I am led to believe six things about this "virus"--please correct me if I am confused on any of these points:

    1. This happened weeks ago. It's not "the second time" as many readers will assume.

    2. It cannot spread itself over the Internet in any way, only over LAN. (Although anyone can post a LAN virus on a forum and get people to download it--but that's not by the virus's own action.)

    3. It cannot spread itself at all in a Mac's default configuration, only if you make the obscure (for most users) change of enabling Bonjour in iChat.

    4. A patch from Apple weeks ago blocked it anyway.

    5. Symantec estimates that zero to 50 users were affected by the "outbreak."

    6. It is not currently spreading in the wild.

    Please post corrections--I don't want to misunderstand the "threat!"


    PS, does anyone have a link to a Windows virus story that contains the words "He and at least one other person"? ;) :D

    PPS here's a link to the MacWorld analysis containing some important details that most articles conveniently "forget" to mention (no, it's not a conspiracy, it's lazy bad journalism--sell ads first, asl questions never):
    http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/02/17/leapafollow/index.php
     
  18. macrumors 68040

    shamino

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Location:
    Vienna, VA
    #18
    This is getting tedious and annoying.

    A trojan horse program does not exploit any security holes to run. It is an ordinary application, given a misleading name/icon, in order to trick an unwary user into running it.

    If I stick a GIF icon on my copy of Photoshop and rename it "hotbabes.gif", it doesn't magically become a virus. If I write a hard-drive eraser program and stick an MP3 icon on it, and call it "omfg.mp3", the only security hole I'm exploiting is the one in the user.

    The only solution to this "problem" would be to completely eliminate the concept of custom icons. Force every application to use a common system-defined icon. Then it won't be possible for an application to pretend to be a document. And even if you do this, you can be certain that some people will still open it. (Look at how many Windows people still open .exe files looking for dirty pictures, even though everybody knows that .exe's are programs.)
     
  19. macrumors 6502a

    thegreatluke

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Location:
    Earth
    #19
    I hate to call this even a "virus."

    It's more like a "poorly written Trojan that affected this guy and one other guy that did basically nothing, just inserting random code into the iLife apps."

    The thing about it is the whole fiasco took place inside a small thread here on MacRumors in a couple hours. According to estimates 30 people downloaded it and only two were affected. Of these thirty people, nobody had major problems with the thing.
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Location:
    California
    #20
    Maybe, maybe not. Sometimes when a system is completely invulnerable (or un-exploited, anyway) it runs quietly in the corner and no one pays it any mind (read as no mindshare, no marketshare). When there are news stories about viruses (virii?) and vulnerabilities, it gains mindshare -- people start to pay attention to it and even go out of their way to trumpet about it, which makes others aware of its existence.

    Unless you can make people aware of a product, they will never buy it *cough* IBM OS/2 *cough*cough*. :)
     
  21. macrumors 68020

    sunfast

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Location:
    London
    #21
    viruses!

    And as they said in the article - I'm much happier on a mac. :)
     

Share This Page