Vote scandal. If true, this is bigger than Watergate

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Pinto, Jul 16, 2003.

  1. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2003
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #1
    Apparently electronic voting results database can easily be hacked into and modified.

    And it may have been designed that way on purpose.

    These people claim to have hacked it!

    Link

    Believable? You decide.
     
  2. macrumors 68040

    patrick0brien

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    The West Loop
    #2
    -Pinto

    It's supposed to be based on windows - e.g. incredibly hackable.

    I'll stick to paper.
     
  3. thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2003
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #3
    Yes, you'd think you would choose a secure system for such important data.
     
  4. macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #4
    Well, the Dept. of Fatherland Security chose MS, so it's obvious the government's concern is with security.
     
  5. macrumors 65816

    tpjunkie

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2002
    Location:
    NYC
    #5
    Did you see the article today about the latest windows security flaw? it affects windows server 2003, the supposedly secure new OS from M$.
     
  6. macrumors 68040

    patrick0brien

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    The West Loop
    #6
    -tpjunkie

    ...the day after the Homeland announcement? Yes, I did. The timing is quite curious....
     
  7. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2003
    Location:
    Halifax, Canada
    #7
    Fraud? Really. Where were you guys 2 years ago...

    What is truly sad is how willing Americans were to allow the theft of the election to go unchallenged. I mean, really! The State Department is always yammering on about how undemocratic the rest of the world is, while the Thief in Chief was a guy appointed by the Supreme Court after his brother and a bunch of other Republican cronies fixed the election results.

    The several thousand black voters who were prohibited from voting in the Florida election because Kathy & Jeb decided to designate them as "felons" (and thus be ineligible to vote) was occasionally mentioned in the press, but didn't seem to bother anyone. As I recall from a BBC story, one of the "felons" was the Chief Electoral Officer for one of the voting districts!

    Hypocrisy is alive and well in America....

    CM
     
  8. macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    chicago
    #8
    Re: Fraud? Really. Where were you guys 2 years ago...

    i guess you didn't hear: after being sworn in, bush declared that the country had moved on. :rolleyes:
     
  9. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    #9
    Re: Fraud? Really. Where were you guys 2 years ago...

    The election was not stolen. It was a close election that was decided under our constitution and laws. You don't have to like them or think they are the best to recognize that they were followed.

    If you followed the aftermath, you know that Bush would have won Florida and the election even if Gore had been given everything he wanted by the courts. The country has moved on, as well it should.
     
  10. macrumors 68040

    patrick0brien

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    The West Loop
    #10
    -Folks

    Can we not rehash this? Macfan is right, that part of history is that, history.

    As for the topic...
     
  11. macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #11
    Re: Re: Fraud? Really. Where were you guys 2 years ago...

    But if they just threw out the (unquestionably) illegal absentee ballots, Gore would have won by a very wide margin.
     
  12. macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    chicago
    #12
    twice before, for macfan's information, i've posted the findings of a large consortium of news agencies who published a large post-election analysis.

    in some scenarios, bush won. in others, gore. it's not at all cut and dry that bush won, as macfan claims.

    further, their analysis left out HUGE numbers of discounted votes which, according to statistical analysis, would have put gore far ahead.

    though bush (and macfan) claim "the country has moved on," i don't think it's necessarily true.

    again, we have the argument that "the ends justify the means." even if bush would have eventually won fair and square, it doesn't excuse the GOPs strong-armed tactics before, during and after the campaign.
     
  13. macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #13
    Re: Re: Fraud? Really. Where were you guys 2 years ago...

    He's also declared that the whole flap over what is affectionately becoming known as Nigergate is also over.
     
  14. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    #14
    Yes, there were possible scenarios where Gore could have won, but none of them that involved what he was asking for from the courts. It is cut and dried that Bush won as evidenced by his presence in the White House today. It is also evident that the Florida legislature was going to step in and carry out their right to send electors for Bush if the recount was incomplete or still tied up in the courts.

    Again, the country has moved on. That issue is just not top of mind for the vast majority of Americans.
     
  15. macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #15
    Well, you are right about this for sure. Top issues in '04 will likely include intelligence snafu's, unemployment levels, homeland (in)security, deficits, economic doldrums, and what to do about the situation in Iraq. But don't think the democratic base will forget the voting irregularities, they will use it as a rallying cry.
     
  16. macrumors 68040

    patrick0brien

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    The West Loop
    #16
    -zimv20

    I agree that the whole thing is nebulous and depatable - we are doing it here after all :D

    Bush can say "let's put it behind us" as much as he wants, but that holds no water in the big picture.

    What ended the discussion years ago was the Supreme Court ruling. The ump has spoken, there is no appeal, there is no rehashing, they are the highest court in the land.

    Now, it's possible to argue that the Supreme court was biased this, and biased that, but it's irrelevant in the eyes of the law - the voting fraud discussion is still just as dead.

    And unless we all become supreme court justices, and we do it ourselves (and if we did so, and it was political, we'd deserve to be strung up by our fingernails), there is no way to change that decision.

    Yes we should rememebr 2000 as a lesson of history, but revisionist history is a waste of time and energy, the law has spoken, the argument is over. This thread should now be turned over to it's rightful subject - future prevention of what happened in 2000 using eletronice voting with Windows systems.
     
  17. macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    chicago
    #17
    the NYT has an article on the s/w flaws
     
  18. macrumors 68000

    Sayhey

    Joined:
    May 22, 2003
    Location:
    San Francisco
    #18
    Before the country "moves on" maybe we should make sure the 2000 fiasco doesn't happen again. This is not just the rehashing of the Florida election, but the quite important task of making sure everyone's vote is counted properly. Democracy kinda seems hollow if we don't count every vote.

    Myself, I won't move on until we get rid of the Electoral College system. There is no reason a vote cast in Wyoming should count for more than mine in San Francisco or the "winner" of an election recieve fewer votes than the "loser."
     
  19. macrumors 68040

    patrick0brien

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    The West Loop
    #19
    -Hear, hear.
     
  20. SPG
    macrumors 65816

    SPG

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2001
    Location:
    In the shadow of the Space Needle.
    #20

Share This Page