Walter Isaacson: Steve Jobs Would Have Supported Beats Acquisition

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, May 30, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Walter Isaacson, known to the Apple community for his authorized Steve Jobs biography, believes the Apple co-founder would have approved of Apple's acquisition of Beats. Isaacson shared his thoughts on the Beats deal during a CNBC interview earlier today (via Fortune).

    [​IMG]
    Isaacson points to the close relationship between Beats co-founder Jimmy Iovine and Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, both of whom shared a similar appreciation for music.
    Before the acquisition was announced, Isaacson speculated that Iovine was Apple's real target, bringing the veteran producer on board to head up the Cupertino company's content business. Isaacson said Iovine could "help Apple launch the TV product that analysts have been gossiping about for years," by using his influence in the media business to negotiate content deals. During an interview at the Code Conference earlier this week, however, Iovine noted that he has enough on his plate with music and has no plans to become involved in television negotiations.


    Iovine has a long history with Apple, helping Steve Jobs sign deals with music labels in the early days of iTunes and working with Apple and U2 on a special edition iPod. Before the launch of Beats Music, he also pitched the idea of a streaming music service to Apple, but neither Steve Jobs nor Tim Cook was interested at the time.

    Upon completion of the acquisition, Iovine and Dr. Dre will join Apple while the Beats team will work under the guidance of Eddy Cue, Apple's senior vice president of Internet Software and Services.

    Article Link: Walter Isaacson: Steve Jobs Would Have Supported Beats Acquisition
     
  2. macrumors 68000

    nepalisherpa

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2011
    Location:
    USA
    #2
    Sure, anyone can claim anything now! :rolleyes:
     
  3. macrumors 603

    chrmjenkins

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Location:
    CA
    #3
    So why not poach him or add him to the board? Was it really worth 3 billion to add him as an executive?
     
  4. macrumors regular

    Redbeard25

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2003
    #4
    I love that the friendly URL for this story is

    "Issacson-Beats-Steve-Jobs"
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2010
    #5
    I would like to hear Ashton Kutcher's opinion on this matter.
     
  6. macrumors 603

    Michaelgtrusa

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Location:
    Everywhere And Nowhere
    #6
    ....but would he?
     
  7. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    #7
    What's annoying is that MacRumors gives a damn to what this autobiographer says..
     
  8. macrumors 6502

    Mums

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2011
    #8
    No he wouldn't.
     
  9. macrumors 68030

    Drumjim85

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    #9
    I don't get why the 3 billion is such a crazy number, other than it being their highest paid acquisition. Beats did about $1.5 billion in revenue last year. Even if only 1/3 of that is profit, and sales are stagnant, it won't take too long for them to recoup. While also getting the other benefits of the business.
     
  10. macrumors 603

    Stella

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Canada
    #10
    Its time for people to move on. Its kind of irrevelent to what SJ would have done. Unfortunately, he's dead.
     
  11. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2011
    Location:
    San Francisco, California
    #11
    Yep, I mean Google paid $3 bil for Nest, and one of their two products is currently off the market for safety reasons. :eek::p
     
  12. macrumors 68000

    Cuban Missles

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2012
    Location:
    My heart is in Camagüey, the rest in the USA
    #12
    I think people need to stand back and give this deal some room to breath. It is done, let's hope for the best. It's too late to second guess, so let's all pitch in and help make it successful.
     
  13. macrumors 65816

    luckydcxx

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2013
    #13
    i think i would tend to agree with the biographer then you (who probably never even met steve jobs).
     
  14. macrumors G3

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    #14
    Until when will MR continuously try to justify this deal?
     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    SmileyBlast!

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    #15
    He spent a lot of time with Jobs. He knows him better than most.

    ----------

    It just feels like such a fad. Some sources say that the Beats headphones cost $14.00 to make and rate at the bottom of similar products. Why are people buying these crappy headphones? Soon more people will ask the same thing. Then it will be a worthless acquisition.
     
  16. macrumors 68040

    the8thark

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    #16
    People are free to say and predict what they want. And MR is free to write articles on any or all of it. It's up to us to sift through it all and take the good parts and put the ******** in the garbage.
     
  17. macrumors member

    ephemeralreason

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    #17
    So pleased that Issacson can channel Jobs. Why not just make him the CEO?
     
  18. macrumors G5

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #18
    Who cares what Walter thinks. Yes - he spent time with Jobs. But that doesn't mean he has any real idea what he would or would not support NOW. Jobs is dead. He's really not an authority on what someone who has passed might or might not approve of. And even if he did - again - who cares. Apple acquired Beats. Who needs Walter to tell us Steve would have been OK with it?!
     
  19. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2013
    #19
    Logical shorthand is a beautiful thing.
     
  20. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    #20
    Who made him the voice of Steve Jobs?
     
  21. macrumors 603

    chrmjenkins

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Location:
    CA
    #21
    Doesn't get to the point of my question. Why did they need him that badly? Why is the best answer we can get for the acquisition "Well, Beats isn't a bad business?"
     
  22. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2013
    #22
    $14? Seriously? Dang, that’s expensive! I’m pretty sure that the headphones sitting on my desk right now cost less than a dollar to make. I guess it’s appropriate then that the Beats cost 14 times as much money to buy.

    I jest, I jest. Kinda.
     
  23. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    #23
    qft
     
  24. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    #24
    I personally think Steve Jobs was more of a 50-Cent guy. They totally blew it with dre
     
  25. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2013
    #25
    Probably because Apple hasn’t provided an answer to that question, and all we’ve got is a bunch of speculation. Apple execs probably have a better answer. Probably.
     

Share This Page