we have os x, but what's the problem with ms

Discussion in 'Mac Apps and Mac App Store' started by jefhatfield, Jul 4, 2002.

  1. jefhatfield Retired

    jefhatfield

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2000
    #1
    how come ms has xp home and xp pro?

    why can't they have one client side os like apple does?

    it would look stupid if we had an os x and an os x pro:p
     
  2. AlphaTech macrumors 601

    AlphaTech

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2001
    Location:
    Natick, MA
    #2
    M$ does it to squeeze even more money out of people.

    Apple is not evil like m$ is, so they just release the one OS, and give you all the power/choices with it.
     
  3. sparkleytone macrumors 68020

    sparkleytone

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2001
    Location:
    Greensboro, NC
    #3
    $100 more to be able to log on to an NT Domain and be a terminal server. ripoff.
     
  4. AlphaTech macrumors 601

    AlphaTech

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2001
    Location:
    Natick, MA
    #4
    I call it a shafting without any lubrication :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :D
     
  5. Catfish_Man macrumors 68030

    Catfish_Man

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2001
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #5
    Well, we have...

    ...OSX and OSX server. Not quite the same, but...
     
  6. AlphaTech macrumors 601

    AlphaTech

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2001
    Location:
    Natick, MA
    #6
    Re: Well, we have...

    Still tons cheaper then m$ windblows server versions... Look up the prices of windblows server versions... You can purchase an Xserve, with the unlimited client version, for what they charge for win2k advanced server. The 25 client package of win2k advance runs about $3500 all by itself. I'd hate to see the cost of the 'unlimited' client version, if they even offer one.

    The reason I say the advanced server version, is because it installes the Macintosh services right off the bat, and has other features that the regular one doesn't have.

    Even the standard win2k server version runs $1600 for a 25 client license version.

    OS X Server runs $500 for a 10 client license or $1000 for the unlimited. Both are far cheaper then any that m$ has to offer.

    m$ 2000 server 5 client runs $850, with a 10 client being $1050. You don't even get anything under a 25 count for the advanced version for an option (at least through retail channels).
     
  7. kiwi_the_iwik macrumors 65816

    kiwi_the_iwik

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2001
    Location:
    London, UK
    #7
    Aw, c'mon Mr. Hat - what Mac user can really say that they care what Microsoft do with their operating systems?

    It's still an interesting concept to build an OS on a maximum of 640Kb of base memory, and to then have to sort out the rest with EMS and XMS, etc... (and you can thank their founder for that - wasn't it he who said that famous line - "...640K should be more than enough for any program..."?)

    Hmmm...


    Why don't we just stick to what's pertinent to Mac users? MS can bite me, in any case. After all - who can possibly compete with THEIR way of thinking? ;)
     
  8. Grokgod macrumors 6502a

    Grokgod

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2002
    Location:
    Deep within the heart of madness!
    #8
    Lets not forget one thing here!

    XP Pro allows you to use MP with it, the OS doesnt recognize the second CPU!

    That is something that I would think is important and just YET one more way that M$ gets to squeeze you dry!
     
  9. big macrumors 65816

    big

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2002
  10. drastik macrumors 6502a

    drastik

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2002
    Location:
    Nashvegas
    #10
    Microsoft, is money hungry, like any company, but businss the way they prcatice it is uncompetitive and wrong. So sayeth the U.S. Government, but does anyone notice M$ stopping thier ainticompetitive actions?
     
  11. Grokgod macrumors 6502a

    Grokgod

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2002
    Location:
    Deep within the heart of madness!
    #11
    M$ stands up to the courts.

    well, M$ threatened the courts that they would have to take M$ off of the shelves if they were forced to separate the browser form the OS.

    Then after hearing and seeong for themselves the hardball M$ plays, they were forced to concede and let M$ get away with it.

    For a while there I thought that ll computers were going to come with the only os available OSX!

    But NOooo! M$ kicked the courts A$$ into submission.

    Well, thats the way it looked to me!
     
  12. j763 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2001
    Location:
    Champaign, IL, USA
    #12
    We shouldn't discourage this "anticompetitive behavior", we should encourage M$ to exploit their customers even more...

    That's why people switch!
     

Share This Page