What miniDV Camcorder Did You Buy ...

Discussion in 'Buying Tips, Advice and Discussion (archive)' started by pimentoLoaf, Jul 3, 2005.

  1. puckhead193 macrumors G3

    puckhead193

    Joined:
    May 25, 2004
    Location:
    NY
    #2
    canon ZR40, good price, small, excellent quality picture
     
  2. atari1356 macrumors 68000

    atari1356

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    #3
    I bought a Panasonic GS-120 about a year ago because it was the least expensive miniDV camcorder that has 3 CCD sensors - which means it has great picture quality and color reproduction. It also works perfectly with iMovie/Final Cut.
     
  3. LethalWolfe macrumors G3

    LethalWolfe

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #4
    Having 3 CCDs won't affect image detail, it will just effect color reproduction. And w/consumer cameras the typical trade off is having 1 1/4" CCD vs 3 1/6" CCDs. In this example the 1 CCD camera will have better image detail (bigger chip) and the 3 CCD camera will have better color reproduction (all other things being equal of course).


    Lethal
     
  4. eXan macrumors 601

    eXan

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Location:
    Russia
    #5
    He didnt say that 3 CCDs affect image detail. He said it affects quality. Read carefully ;)
     
  5. ksz macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2003
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    #6
    He said "great picture quality and color reproduction." Three CCDs will give you color reproduction but will they give you better "picture quality" where quality is referring to something other than color? We should all read carefully (me too).

    I have a Panasonic Palmcorder that's 3 years old and no longer made. It was an agonizing decision because no single model jumped out as the clear winner. I picked the Palmcorder for its size, optics, optical zoom length, image stabilizer (alas it has electronic stabilization, not optical), low-light capability, etc. At the time it had great specs...and I'm happy to say it has worked flawlessly.

    But now it's time for HD if only there were models in the $1200 range or below. I can just imagine my own HD-quality movies. I travel a lot and a compact size, high-definition camcorder might just be video nirvana.
     
  6. SpaceMagic macrumors 68000

    SpaceMagic

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Location:
    Cardiff, Wales
    #7
    I think I want a Sony Handicam, but don't want to be paying for the name... i've heard though, that Sony are quality.
     
  7. LethalWolfe macrumors G3

    LethalWolfe

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #8
    Congratulations. In trying to be a smart@ss you came off as a dumb@ss.

    I'm going to work under the assumption that you read and comprehended ksz's post so there's no point in me repeating what's already been said.

    atari1356's post is a common misunderstanding in regards to 3 CCD vs. 1 CCD cameras and I just wanted to clear it up.

    If you have anything useful to add to the thread be my guest, but it's really irritating and rude to have someone come in and do nothing but act like a d*ck towards posters that are actually contributing.


    Lethal
     
  8. Badradio macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2004
    Location:
    Manchester
    #9
    I bought a Sony PC109E last year and I'm really happy with it. Very small (easily fits in your jacket pocket) but great picture quality and features. My main reason for choosing it was the 1mp ccd that allows shooting in true 16:9 widescreen. Everything looks cooler in widescreen. DV-in was a plus too.
     
  9. Switzermac macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
  10. Willy S macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    #11
    Panasonic GS-120 or higher.

    If you have money to burn, Sony FX-1 is HD. :rolleyes:
     
  11. pdpfilms macrumors 68020

    pdpfilms

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Location:
    Vermontana
    #12
    Panasonic DVX100a. Why? 24p. 24p, 24p, 24p!!!!!! Great gamma controls, produces images that manage to look unlike all other DV video.
     
  12. atari1356 macrumors 68000

    atari1356

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    #13
    With all due respect... I didn't misunderstand anything. In my view, color reproduction is a large part of image quality.

    You make the argument that 1CCD cameras generally have larger sensors, so have more detailed images... which may be a valid argument, but that doesn't mean that the overall image quality of those video cameras are better than a 3CCD camera.

    ... and obviously there are other factors involved that affect image quality like the lens and the cameras internal processing of the video... so really debating about the merits of 1 larger CDD versus 3 slightly smaller CCD's is futile. Ultimately you have to just try different video cameras out to see which you like better. I like the Panasonic GS-120.
     
  13. 2jaded2care macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2003
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #14
    For personal use, I bought a Panasonic PV-GS19 for around $300 on sale @ Circuit City. It's only 1 chip, a basic model, but is miniDV and I figured if my 7-year-old dropped it or I ruined it at the beach, it would be a less heart-breaking loss than, say, a GS-120 or DVX-100A.

    I do have access to other camcorders for taping "real" events, like an XL-1 and GS-120, so I have lots of options for now. I'm just going to have a hard time controlling my impulses when the AG-HVX200 comes out...

    If you're asking because you're in the market for a camcorder, good luck!
     
  14. AznBboy58 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    #15
    I have the XL2 but once the HVX200 comes out ... yummy ...
     
  15. evil_santa macrumors 6502a

    evil_santa

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    Location:
    London, England
    #16
    I got a Sony DCR-HC 42 a few weeks ago. £385. It has all the things I need , DV in/ out Video in/out 16:9
     
  16. roadapple macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    #17
    I just bought a Sony DCR-HC90 last week. So far it has worked perfectly with iLife '05, but I did have to upgrade from '04 for widescreen support.

    I would try to play with a Sony in the store before buying, as the touch screen control is not for everyone. But as far as picture quality and ease of use, I think it's outstanding, but I'm not one to play with manual settings much.

    Oh, and why I bought it, I'm a sony wh*re :D
     
  17. LethalWolfe macrumors G3

    LethalWolfe

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #18
    When you specifically mentioned color reproduction and image quality separately I thought you were talking about two different things (image detail and color quality). I apologize for not realizing you were just repeating yourself.

    Did I say overall image quality? No. I said image detail.

    Which is why I said, "...all other things being equal..."

    Who's debating? I'm talking about facts. CCD size matters.

    That's great. I'm not dogin' your camera. You don't need to defend your purchase.

    I was just addressing a common misunderstanding regarding consumer cameras. 3CCD cameras aren't hands down better than 1CCD cameras, there is a trade off. Whether it matters or not is up to the individual, but it's still there, and I'm just trying to help people make an informed decision.


    Lethal
     
  18. amac4me macrumors 65816

    amac4me

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
  19. Militar macrumors member

    Militar

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2005
    #20
    I bought a Canon GL1. The 3 CCDs make video images appear so much more lifelike and with great low light performance. I am very happy with my GL1.
     
  20. 2jaded2care macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2003
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #21
    I used to be a Sony wh*re as well, but you're right, the touch screen controls are not for everyone. They make sense on a PDA, but encouraging people to touch the LCD on camcorders just doesn't seem like a great idea to me.

    Also I'm not too sold on the HDV format myself (which Sony's a part of), but that's just from what I've read, I haven't seen it yet. The DVCPRO HD format sounds like the way to go, but I guess you get what you pay for.

    On another note, I'm beginning to feel like I'm in a political forum, what with all the acrimony here... ;) Is July 5th that crappy for everyone?
     
  21. WildCowboy Administrator/Editor

    WildCowboy

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    #22
    Sony DCR-HC21 about a month ago...bought it because it was free...racked up a bunch of points on the SonyCard over the years and decided it was time to redeem some of them.

    Plays well with iLife '05 so far. I didn't go for the 32 or 42 because I had no interest in low quality still image features (that's what real digital cameras are for) or the docking station (I'd rather carry around some cables and connect directly).
     
  22. Le Big Mac macrumors 68020

    Le Big Mac

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    #23
    Same here, although don't flame me on the debate. I got it because at the time it seemed to offer the best value for the money. No problems--works with iMovie as it should.
     
  23. LethalWolfe macrumors G3

    LethalWolfe

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #24
    For pro use I'm of the same mind, but for personal/consumer use I think HDV will be great.


    Lethal
     
  24. VanMac macrumors 6502a

    VanMac

    Joined:
    May 26, 2005
    Location:
    Rampaging Tokyo
    #25
    I have a Canon Elura that I bought over 5 years ago. MiniDV just coming out, and one of the first consumer camera's with FireWire.

    Still working good. I've yet to use the firewire as I'm not going to do video editing till I get a Mac. Hopefully soon!
     

Share This Page