Think matrix. Think matrix. 2x2. Consumer and Professional. It's really quite simple.
What you need to grasp is that Apple must resist returning to the bad old days of non-exoteric market segmentation. You struggle to paint a picture of why the MacBook exists with fancy words about jet setting executives. It's not language the punter in the street understands. KISS is a well used term but is apt when selling computers. Keep it simple; keep choices limited.
I'm just having a problem typing on the current macbook. Apple should try to rectify this problem. At the same time they should lower the price of the Macbook since it would replace the macbook air.
Many/most people don't have a problem with the keyboard. If you do, this isn't a notebook for you. It isn't a 'problem' for everyone.
Of course they should lower the price...while they're at it, end hunger and help foster world peace!
You couldn't be more wrong, look at what's going on in consumer electronics, hotels, food chains, even automobiles. It's an era of differentiation, segmentation, and specialization. It's a time where "less is more" no longer works. Today's consumers, driven by the millennials, don't want to settle for a lowest-common-denominator product. They want something built especially for them with all the features they want and none of the features they don't want.
Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. Let's understand that AAPL was 3 months from insolvency with a truckload of overlapping products and then after simplification to the 2x2 matrix they became the largest corporation in America. Based on that, which is more successful?
Millennials? They don't have any money to worry about buying products.
Bmw...only the driving pleasureYou couldn't be more wrong, look at what's going on in consumer electronics, hotels, food chains, even automobiles. It's an era of differentiation, segmentation, and specialization. It's a time where "less is more" no longer works. Today's consumers, driven by the millennials, don't want to settle for a lowest-common-denominator product. They want something built especially for them with all the features they want and none of the features they don't want.
Look to BMW and the 3 Series, best selling car in its luxury segment for over 30 years. It used to consist of just 4 body types- sedan, coupe, convertible, and wagon. Today it's been expanded into the 3 Series, the X Series, and the 4 Series, there must be 15 different configurations of sedans, coupes, convertibles, wagons, hatchbacks, liftbacks, SUV's, SAV's, all to draw interest from the same buyer. I myself own something called a 4 Series Gran Coupe which is a 4-door version of the 2-door coupe which makes no structural sense from an assortment standpoint but is what kept me in the BMW brand had they not differentiated and created it. It's lower and wider and sportier than the 3 Series 4-door I used to own yet has a ton of room and easy entry for my son's hockey equipment in the back. There was a time where such a fractional, niche vehicle would never make it past the board room's number crunchers, but today it's an essential part of a strategy to offer consumers choice. A lot of choice.
Back to Apple, it's a time to add more notebooks with more pricepoints and more differentiated features, it is by no means a time to scale back and simplify.
BJ
Going from 2 notebooks to 3 is hardly going to doom Apple.
In fact, their notebooks are the very thing that can help turn around their doom-and-gloom stock price perception. There are a lot of bored Pro and Air owners out there essentially using notebooks designed almost a decade ago just dying to buy something new.
BJ
I think the entry model will be either 11" MBA as is now (4GB, 128GB model only) at $899, or rMB as is now at $1099. Then there will be gen 2 rMB at 12" and 14" and updated rMBP.
It will definitely be interesting 2016!
So the MBA is not going anywhere, but then you suggest it's going to third-world countries.
I think the MBA's done (as a mainstream product).
It's clear Apple's headed to "retinized" all their products. The MB becomes the low-priced offering (more so when they cut the price by $200 in the next revision). They just need to ensure it's not too powerful that it infringes on MBP territory.
This argument actually directly supports why they should discontinue the MBA. Those MBA and MBP users who want something new aren't going to be looking at the MBA line at all - they're already deciding whether they should go MB or wait out a redesign of the MBP, depending on their needs. You and I are examples of this. If Apple hadn't released the MB, I'd still be using my old 11" MBA, waiting for something better.Going from 2 notebooks to 3 is hardly going to doom Apple.
In fact, their notebooks are the very thing that can help turn around their doom-and-gloom stock price perception. There are a lot of bored Pro and Air owners out there essentially using notebooks designed almost a decade ago just dying to buy something new.
BJ
That being said, absolutely agree on expecting a price drop on the rMB. In fact I'd guarantee it. Not that that means much...but it's a really expensive device and it'll obviously see a price drop given the more advanced supply-chain readiness, the increased demand, etc. And, historically, almost every new Apple notebook comes it at a high-price and finds its way down from there as refreshes are released.
Do you guys think the next rMB will come with usb-c or thunderbolt 3 (or one of each, for those of you who think that the new macbook will come with two ports)? When it was released with broadwell, it was a bit too early for thunderbolt 3, but I'm hopeful the next version will come with it (wouldn't mind getting a thunderbolt dock).
It's not going to happen.
If anything, look for Apple to remove ports and weight and height and length. They're not going to add anything. The mission of the RMB is to be as thin and light and minimal as possible, rely on new wireless technologies, eschew legacy paperweights. For those who want a Swiss Army knife of a notebook, the new Pro will suffice.
BJ
It's not going to happen.
If anything, look for Apple to remove ports and weight and height and length. They're not going to add anything. The mission of the RMB is to be as thin and light and minimal as possible, rely on new wireless technologies, eschew legacy paperweights. For those who want a Swiss Army knife of a notebook, the new Pro will suffice.
BJ
I think you described the iPad Pro.
Any chance of having a 1TB option?
Any chance of having a 1TB option?
I highly doubt they will remove the usb c port any time soon. Thunderbolt 3 is the same shape, so it would make no difference as far as external appearance is concerned.
It's true that it would take a little more internal space, but it's also true that Skylake is more efficient than Broadwell was, and if Apple keeps the same form factor or very near to it (which I think is pretty likely), they could reduce the battery size by a tiny amount to accommodate the increase in internal space required for thunderbolt over usb c and still likely realize small gains in battery life.
It also seems to fit the ideology of the new macbook to me; no wasted space or extra ports when you don't need it, but one powerful port that can do whatever you want when you dock it (like, for instance, connect to a 5k external display at 60 Hz, which usb c doesn't do -- surely an executive wouldn't want to use any external display of lower quality than 5k? ;p).