leeming said:ok thanks, but do you think it is worth paying more for the apple base station?
Nope. I have an AirPort Extreme as well as the WRT54GS. The Linksys has a much better signal, and many many more features, especially when running a 3rd party firmware such ast HyperWRT (no where near as complicated as it might sound ).leeming said:ok thanks, but do you think it is worth paying more for the apple base station?
thanks
Look at the website (which I even linked for you) and seeleeming said:what are the advantages of the 3rd party firmware?
sk1985 said:Both airport models are pretty lame (I've returned both). Linksys and net gear have both failed me too many times in the past. So I really can't recommend both those brands. I hear good things about berlin and D-link.
edesignuk said:Course, everyone has their own fav, which by pure coincidence also happens to be the one they went for
edesignuk said:Nope. I have an AirPort Extreme as well as the WRT54GS. The Linksys has a much better signal, and many many more features, especially when running a 3rd party firmware such ast HyperWRT (no where near as complicated as it might sound ).
JeffTL said:The Airport outlasted the shoddy Linksys product -- which perhaps lasted a year, compared to the Airport, which I've had for about two and a quarter years with no signs of decay yet.
tonyl said:But be careful with different versions of Linksys routers, some of them can't run 3rd party firmware.
edesignuk said:Look at the website (which I even linked for you) and see
aswitcher said:Pre-N's are appearing. Might be a good buy for the future.
mkrishnan said:What's the likelihood at this point that a pre-N device will be soft upgradeable to the final standard?
There were a couple of different solutions proposed to be the 802.11n standard. The different proposals were not totally compatible with each other. In January, the IEEE took the first step in accepting a draft of one of the proposals to become the standard. Right now all major companies are working on creating routers that will comply to the standard. The problem is that the routers currently on the market may still follow a proposal that wasn't accepted. So it is still undetermined if a pre-n router (even with a firmware upgrade) will fully comply with the official N standard. My advice, stay away for now. Pre-N routers are too expensive for something that may not even be compatible with tomorrow's technology.mkrishnan said:What's the likelihood at this point that a pre-N device will be soft upgradeable to the final standard?
sk1985 said:Both airport models are pretty lame (I've returned both). Linksys and net gear have both failed me too many times in the past. So I really can't recommend both those brands. I hear good things about berlin and D-link.
dmcelroy said:I use an Airport base station along with an Airport Express to extend the network range. I originally bought the Airport because I could get it with both the modem and Ethernet for later when I went to DSL. In both cases the Airport has worked flawlessly, is easy to administer, and has offered no problems. When I added the Express it was simple to set it up to extend the network and I plugged my printer into it making that available on the network. I have a 2400 square foot home and I have a full power signal throughout the house.
The other routers may work just fine too, but I thought someone who has been very happy with the Apple product should speak up.