Who will run in 2008???

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by crdean1, Oct 10, 2005.

  1. crdean1 macrumors 6502a

    crdean1

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Location:
    Texas
    #1
    I know that many of you on these boards don't like Bush and didn't necessarily like Kerry either.

    1. Who do you think will run in 2008?

    Possible D List: http://www.politics1.com/p2008-dems.htm
    Possible R List: http://www.politics1.com/p2008-gop.htm

    2. Who would you like to see run?

    Me? Condi & Hillary!

    CRD
    ______________________________________________
    FYI - I looked for a thread like this and didn't find anything. Please delete this and point me in the right direction if there is one already.
     
  2. solvs macrumors 603

    solvs

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    LaLaLand, CA
    #2
    The only people who want Hillary to run are Neocons. The Libs would never elect her because she could never win. Same with Condi. Though the real reasons are a lot sadder than that. Since I don't like either of them, and it has nothing to do with their gender or race, I'd rather move to Canada. If it came down to the 2 of them, I'd rather move to Iraq.

    Some moderate, but boring Dem who probably sucks and some holier than thou Repub. A douche bag and a crap sandwich. Yay Democracy.
     
  3. Xtremehkr macrumors 68000

    Xtremehkr

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    #3
    I think Hillary could win. The only reason Democrats have doubted her is because the conservatives have been so vehement about her. But, if you don't consider what they are saying, she doesn't sounds half bad.

    I have a feeling Kerry and Edwards may run again, maybe even Gore.

    I don't know if Condi realistically has a chance, she is just presented as a foil for Hillary. Hillary at least has Bill on her side.
     
  4. crdean1 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    crdean1

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Location:
    Texas
    #4
    Hillary has gotten everywhere because of Bill, partner at her firm, first lady, arguably senator.

    Condi has gotten everywhere on her own.

    I don't think that is who will run, but I would like to see them run. I don't necessarily agree with either one on some issues. I agree that with what we have to choose from, I may move to Canada as well.
     
  5. Sayhey macrumors 68000

    Sayhey

    Joined:
    May 22, 2003
    Location:
    San Francisco
    #5
    Of course one could look at it from the perspective that Bill got everywhere he did with the help of Hillary and Condi only got where she did with the help of the Bush family.

    I don't think this will be the matchup either - Condi is not going to run. Her role in 9-11 screw ups make her too vulnerable. It will be McCain or some one with the blessing of the religious right (Brownback, Allen, etc.) for the GOP.
     
  6. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #6
    All depends on how much McCain pisses off his own party over the next couple years.
     
  7. yg17 macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #7
    While I would never vote for McCain (Unless someone like Al Sharpton won the Dem primaries, but that would never happen, so....), I still hope he gets the GOP nomination. Because if unfortunatley a Dem lost the presidental election, I could tolerate McCain as president, unlike some of the other republicants who may run.
     
  8. atszyman macrumors 68020

    atszyman

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Location:
    The Dallas 'burbs
    #8
    Which could actually be a good thing. If Bush keeps on with his current track record/approval trend, the Republicans are going to need to run someone who can distance themselves from Bush or risk a landslide defeat. If McCain keeps it up he might be their only choice in 2008 because of his opposition.
     
  9. scem0 macrumors 604

    scem0

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    back in NYC!
  10. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #10
    I'd like to see Russ Feingold against Rick Santorum.

    Or Wes Clark against Sam Brownback

    Or a dead cat against Bill Frist.

    Or Rush Limbaugh versus a bottle of OxyContin

    Or Madonna against Brittany Spears.... oh wait this isn't Celebrity Deathmatch.
     
  11. jelloshotsrule macrumors G3

    jelloshotsrule

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Location:
    serendipity
    #11
    he will never win. why? he's too honest and awesome

    saw the last half of his speech at the green festival a few weeks ago. damn he was inspiring. he described himself as a "green democrat", trying to change the party from within. he was getting people fired up (admittedly, these people are already the activist type) and talking about how important involvement at the local level is... very cool

    one time i had to deliver a letter from ralph to dennis at the house building where his office is.... needless to say, dumpy looking me was denied by security twice because i said i had a delivery and they don't accept deliveries... meanwhile any old person can enter there for tours, etc. it pissed me off, and i had to call down someone in the office to come get it. i felt dumb.


    looking over that list of dem hopefuls, i am frightened. edwards would be ok, but he's still too corporate, too pro war, too globalizing for me. dean is a bit of a phony to me (having sold out his strong opposition to the corporate dems, only to staunchly and blindly support them later). gore has been awesome lately, and i'd get excited to see him run. assuming he maintained that inspiration and passion that he lost in his tenure as senator/vp/pres candidate. hillary doesn't do much for me. she's great on some things, but then still wastes time on dumb **** like video game ratings, etc. lieberman... goodness, may as well elect a republican. wes clark- felt ok about him at one point, but have since been scared off him a bit. hmm... why is al sharpton bad exactly? sure, he's a bit hard to take seriously because he's always making jokes and comments that are harsher and more truthful than most candidates trying to sell themselves would really say. but i love that he stands up for what he believes in. if kerry, gore, etc. got as passionate as sharpton is when they were running, things might be different. edwards is pretty good in that respect, i just disagree with many of his views..

    blah
     
  12. crdean1 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    crdean1

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Location:
    Texas
    #12

    I think the dead cat would win, and I'm conservative. Frist is a moron.
     
  13. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #13
    "Dead Cat for President"

    I'm on board!

    The Republican party will never nominate John McCain. It's statistically impossible. The party leadership has pretty well fixed the match in favor of a social conservative. And considering his advancing age, I question whether McCain would even run.

    The Democrats could nominate Hillary Clinton, but I hope to hell they don't. I no more want a second president named Clinton than I wanted a second one named Bush. Look to the statehouses -- this is where some of the strongest national candidates often come from. Bill Richardson is a name that keeps popping up on the D-side.

    The dynamics of the 2008 presidential election will be strongly influenced by the results of next year's midterm election. If the Republicans take a drubbing, a number of the currently anointed in the party will fall rapidly from grace.
     
  14. katchow macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Location:
    Dayton, Ohio
    #14
    didn't Bill the Cat already lose twice? OOP ACK THPPPT!!!
     
  15. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #15
    Yeah I think so, but he didn't run against Bill Frist!
     
  16. Nickygoat macrumors 6502a

    Nickygoat

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Location:
    London
    #16
    Why could neither of them win? Obviously not against each other - one would have to win :p - but alone?
    The UK Sunday Times has an interesting article about it. Basically saying that Condi would prefer a VP slot in 2008, meaning a hard right Presidential candidate.
    I'm not too hot on US politics so any explanation would be welcome :D
     
  17. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #17
    Too much baggage, for both of them. Further, Rice is actually a quite poor public speaker. Dull, grating, with an obvious edge of unease. As for Hillary Clinton, she's becoming a formidable politician, but the number of people who just plain hate the Clintons is legion. As you can see from these boards, the main advocates for her nomination are Republicans, who'd love to run an election against Monica Lewinsky.
     
  18. Nickygoat macrumors 6502a

    Nickygoat

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Location:
    London
    #18
    Granted they have too much baggage but don't the others on crdean1's list? Joe Biden will be 65 in 2008, Evan Bayh seems too closely aligned to the Clintons, Wes Clark (at least from this side of the pond) a bit wishy washy, Feingold seems to have shot himself in the foot and who would vote for Kerry again?
    As for the GOP - Guiliani is too much of a lefty (is he?), Gingrich is a busted flush and most seem too "religious right" - does that leave McCain (too old?), Mitt Romney (from previous threads on here just plain loony :p ) and Bill Frist - the name rings a bell but I can't pin him down to anything.
    Not endorsing any of them but I am curious. I know it's far too early to be serious about this but I'd still like to know.
     
  19. leekohler macrumors G5

    leekohler

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Location:
    Chicago, Illinois
    #19
    I'm with you on this one. Who really wants a leader anyway? What America really seems to want is a dictator. So much easier when someone tells you what to do. That way, you don't have to think! ;)
     
  20. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #20
    We shouldn't get too obsessed with the familiar names. As you say, this thing is still a long way off, and a great deal can and probably will happen between now and then, not the least of which is the midterm election, which could change the political landscape considerably if the Democrats manage to gain some ground in Congress. Most of the really interesting candidates tend to come from the wings. Nobody would have handicapped Bill Clinton as a winner before the 1992 primaries.

    I can't see either McCain or Guiliani surviving a Republican primary. Neither will satisfy social conservatives and they pretty much own the party now.

    Don't know if you're kidding about Frist but he's the majority leader in the Senate. I think he's a dead letter. He's carrying more baggage than a Pullman porter.
     
  21. CanadaRAM macrumors G5

    CanadaRAM

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Location:
    On the Left Coast - Victoria BC Canada
    #21
    Who will run in 2008???

    Windows still won't....


    :p
     
  22. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #22
    Some things in life are more certain that others.

    Thanks for the reminder. ;)
     
  23. yg17 macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #23

    If it came down to Hillary v.s. Condi, then Nader would have a chance.

    It's the sad truth that there are many male chauvanist pigs who would not let a woman be president, and they'd vote for Nader just because he's a male, even if he is the complete opposite of them politically. Sad but true :(
     
  24. Nickygoat macrumors 6502a

    Nickygoat

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Location:
    London
    #24
    No I wasn't kidding about Frist - just saying that I've read nothing about him that I can place
    Females make more than 50% of the voting population so why should chauvinism be a factor? Still idly curious :p
     
  25. Lyle macrumors 68000

    Lyle

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Location:
    Madison, Alabama
    #25
    Don't assume that women would vote in a bloc for a female candidate. I suspect that there are a large number of female chauvinist pigs who aren't ready for a female U.S. president either.

    And I agree with IJ; it's a little too early to make predictions about likely candidates for 2008, given the expectations for the 2006 elections. There are some clear divisions emerging in the Republican party (see: the Harriet Miers nomination) and if Democrats indeed win big in 2006, things will get even more shaken up.
     

Share This Page