Why Mod Access required (was Editors/Macbytes)

Discussion in 'Community' started by tazo, Aug 9, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. tazo macrumors 68040

    tazo

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2003
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest, Seattle, WA actually
    #1
    Congratulations mudbug!

    Not to spoil this thread or anything, but I think wdlove should have been considered for a mod position if there was one available. He is always nice, reassuring, and a true help; a real asset to the site.

    Not to say that mudbug won't make a fine moderator, it just seems like there are others on the website who have been more conducive to the website flow.

    My 2.5 cents. Sorry..
     
  2. arn macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #2
    this was more of an editor position than a mod-position.

    the usual suspects will be conducting the mod dirty-work. ;)

    arn
     
  3. tazo thread starter macrumors 68040

    tazo

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2003
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest, Seattle, WA actually
    #3
    I understand that he is doing fine work for macbytes, I just fail to see the need for gaining mod access.

    :confused:
     
  4. arn macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #4
    he has to be able to move and edit the corresponding forum posts that accompany MacBytes.

    arn
     
  5. MrMacMan macrumors 604

    MrMacMan

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2001
    Location:
    1 Block away from NYC.
    #5
    Yeah correct me If I'm wrong, but I think arn turned off mod by specific forums.
     
  6. Kwyjibo macrumors 68040

    Kwyjibo

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2002
    #6
    I'm mixed on the decision... I have confidence Mudbug will do a fine job but at the same time he doesn't have a presence here....he never really posts much so its hard to really know him or what he thinks....I'm sure we'll grow to love him.

    Congrats on the promo...
     
  7. arn macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #7
    this thread was split into this one due to the offtopic question.

    arn
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page