I would say maybe 50/50 to retina, depending on if it's cost effective and they can pull it off on the larger screen size. If I was going to gamble on it I would probably put my bet on no retina.
But I personally can't see haswell being in the 2013 iMac's.
With all the issues they are having producing a regular 27" display as thin as they are, I don't see how in the world they could produce a retina display that is cost effective while keeping it as thin as it currently is.
I guess they could regress a little like they did with the iPad Mini and provide and inferior product that has a worse screen; meaning they could make the iMac thicker again, so they can add retina support.
iMac is Apple's cheapest desktop that is ready to go out of the box ... meaning it is targeted at many budget conscious consumers. Retina screens that big are still too expensive
iMac is Apple's cheapest desktop that is ready to go out of the box ... meaning it is targeted at many budget conscious consumers. Retina screens that big are still too expensive
iMac & budget? Haha! You must have money to burn.
I disagree. A 2013 haswell iMac is pretty much a given. Why not?