That still requires X11. This wishlist is for a native-GUI version.bux said:What about this: http://www.gimp.org/macintosh/ ?
Edit: As rueyeet pointed out just before I did!
That still requires X11. This wishlist is for a native-GUI version.bux said:What about this: http://www.gimp.org/macintosh/ ?
Abstract said:Eliminate Office for Macs, and the number of switchers drops dramatically.
Potential switcher looks into switching to Mac, finds that MS doesn't release a version of Office for Mac anymore, a program that he and his kids use all the time, and boom, no more switcher. They could do lots of research and realize that OpenOffice exists, read up on OpenOffice, but the large majority of people wouldn't bother searching.
And even if OpenOffice was preinstalled on Macs, and it's advertised as a fully compatible product to MS Office, many people would still be reluctant to buy an expensive computer only to find out if this is true or not.
So no, lets not hope that Apple produces an "Office killer." Office is still the standard, and it's Mac presence makes Apple computers more attractive. Eliminating standard software (that's not bad) just because you don't like MS for whatever reason is dumb if it will hurt Apple sales in any way. This could only hurt Mac sales, mostly because it can't help sales. People won't see Office availability and turn to Dell instead.
On the other hand, it is true that if there are no Mac users (or employees of Mac-centric companies) contributing to a project, that a substantial porting effort simply won't be made.rueyeet said:I wasn't aware that open-source projects were only intended to benefit those with the expertise to contribute to them. I have also heard it argued that one of the advantages of open-source is that if there's enough of a demand for something, a programmer is likely to be working on it somewhere.
neilrobinson said: