Working Apple 1 Computer Sells for Record Auction Price of $671,400

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, May 25, 2013.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    The New York Times reports that a working Apple 1 computer has sold at auction in Germany for a record $671,400, breaking the previous mark of $640,000 set last November at the same auction house. That November record has eclipsed an earlier record of $375,000 set less than six months earlier.

    [​IMG]
    The Apple 1, one of only a handful working units remaining in existence, carries the signature of Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak and was originally owned by Major League Baseball player Fred Hatfield. The auction included a letter from Steve Jobs to Hatfield offering a trade-in deal on an Apple II board, an offer Hatfield declined for unknown reasons. The identity of the owner who put the item up for auction has not been disclosed.

    Update: The New York Times now notes that the Fred Hatfield who was the original owner of the machine was not the former Major League Baseball player and instead was a New Orleans resident who sold the machine in non-working condition to a private buyer for $40,000 earlier this year. The buyer repaired the machine and flew to California to have it signed by Wozniak before placing it up for auction.

    Article Link: Working Apple 1 Computer Sells for Record Auction Price of $671,400
     
  2. JDB1983 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2009
  3. Dr McKay macrumors 68040

    Dr McKay

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Location:
    Kirkland
    #3
    No, but it can play Crysis.
     
  4. rei101 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    #4
    Mmm....

    If I had way too much money to the point it has no value for me... I could buy it IF I was a programmer.

    What ever, people are people.
     
  5. jaymc macrumors regular

    jaymc

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2012
    Location:
    Port Orchard, WA
    #5
    I got a working Colecovision ... how much can I get for that??? :confused:
     
  6. JayCee842 macrumors 6502a

    JayCee842

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    #6
    That's almost a $1 million. Pretty crazy. That computer could buy me a couple of nice cars! :D
     
  7. Kissaragi macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    #7
    That paperwork is in very good condition, no wonder it went for such a lot.
     
  8. melchior macrumors 65816

    melchior

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2002
    #8
    not really
     
  9. BornAgainMac macrumors 603

    BornAgainMac

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Location:
    Florida Resident
    #9
    That is more expensive than having a cup of coffee.
     
  10. Shrink macrumors demi-god

    Shrink

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Location:
    New England, USA
    #11
    I like your math. I'll give you $650 and you give me $1000 back. $650 is almost $1000...no?;):D
     
  11. Porco macrumors 68010

    Porco

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    #12
    Macs have always been expensive, but this is ridiculous, that's it, I'm getting a linux PC! It doesn't even run Mountain Lion! :p

    In all seriousness it's almost certainly a fine investment given the historical impact Apple have had and are still having on the world.
     
  12. Santabean2000 macrumors 68000

    Santabean2000

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2007
    #13
    Spend your money on what you like, but I can think of a few better things myself.

    Whatever. Happy days
     
  13. bushido Suspended

    bushido

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Location:
    Germany
  14. JayCee842 macrumors 6502a

    JayCee842

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    #15
    A GTR and LFA. Or Lambo and an LFA or other car so yeah! ;)
     
  15. WhiteIphone5 macrumors 65816

    WhiteIphone5

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Location:
    Lima, Peru
    #16
    Nice math
     
  16. NutsNGum macrumors 68030

    NutsNGum

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2010
    Location:
    Glasgow, Scotland
    #17
    Not if they worked for it. They can spend it on whatever crap they want.
     
  17. iGrip macrumors 68000

    iGrip

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    #18
    Had they bought this a few years ago, when Apple was on its way up, it would have been a good investment. But now? While Apple's cache is fading? Not so much.
     
  18. spacehog371 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    #19
    Apple doesn't need to be successful in order for these computers to remain valuable. They have a very important place in the history of computing regardless of Apple's continued success.
     
  19. theluggage macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    #20
    It would have been $666,666 in keeping with tradition if the buyer hadn't let the auctioneer persuade him he needed the Monster RS232 cable...
     
  20. Gnomepatrol macrumors member

    Gnomepatrol

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Location:
    Metro East Area
    #21
    Pretty cool that it was in working order. Hopefully it stays that way.
     
  21. Koulie macrumors regular

    Koulie

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #22
    +1
    Would of been a lot more of an appealing story if it sold for $666,666
    approximately x1000 of its $666.66 selling price 37 years ago.
     
  22. gnasher729 macrumors G5

    gnasher729

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    #23
    It's not a Mac.

    It is an Apple computer. I'm not sure if it was ever really called an Apple 1 computer, just like the very first Macintosh is just called Macintosh and nothing else, the first iPod is called iPod and nothing else, the first Pentium processor was called Pentium and nothing else.


    Apple's cache is fading? What cache are you talking about? The cache in my MBP seems to be working just fine, not "fading" at all if you explain what it would mean for a cache to be "fading".
     
  23. Amadeus71 macrumors member

    Amadeus71

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2013
    #24
    Question about the letter in the video

    Does anybody know what the bottom letters mean?

    They read:

    SJ: ck
     
  24. chocolaterabbit macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2008
    #25
    Think he means cachet.
     

Share This Page