Would a Democratic sweep be good or bad in the long run?

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by MacNut, Nov 4, 2008.

  1. macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #1
    If the Democrats take both House and Senate with huge majorities would that be a good thing or would that make the country too lopsided. We do need some form of balance in government. Do the Dems have to be careful not to go over board and risk a revolt. What would be the Republicans best chance at redeeming it self. And how long do you see a tilt in power before things even out.
     
  2. macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago, IL, USA
    #2
    Control of a single party is always dangerous and it never succeeds. In almost every historical instance, the majority party either divides or dissolves soon after being in total control.
     
  3. macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #3
    We can see what happened the last time that there was one party in power and that didn't end good, so I doubt the Democrats will do a better job controlling everything.
     
  4. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Location:
    Silicon Valley, CA
    #4
    It will be the real test of the Obama Presidency. He has to govern in a way that does not alienate.

    I have high expectations as that was the foundation of his campaign.

    Though George Bush said that as well. I'm a uniter not a divider.
     
  5. macrumors 601

    Tilpots

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Location:
    Carolina Beach, NC
    #5
    I think this is the revolt. The risk to the Dems is not coming through with their promises. If they have all this power now, they need to wield it while they can for things like Healthcare, Taxes, etc..
     
  6. thread starter macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #6
    People don't like to pay a lot of taxes. The Dems can not go spend happy. The reason the Republicans are getting voted out is because they spent to much money.
     
  7. macrumors 601

    Tilpots

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Location:
    Carolina Beach, NC
    #7
    That's not the only reason they're getting voted out.

    And I don't see the Dems going spend happy because there's not any money to spend. The tax increases on the rich will fund many of these changes, if (and it's a big if) they follow through with their promises.
     
  8. thread starter macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #8
    The American voter is very fickle. They have a sort attention span. If they don't like how things are going no matter how good or bad things might be they will vote for change. The voting we are seeing is not based on common sense but more anger.
     
  9. macrumors 68000

    flyinmac

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Location:
    United States
    #9
    Having any party as the majority / total control is bad.

    But, that being said, if the Democrats do get this luxury this time, they will reveal their true colors.

    Now, keep in mind that I am not affiliated with either party. So, understand that my views on this are based more on history and observation than my preference for one party or the other. And, keep in mind that when I voted this time, there was more Democrats on my ballot than Republicans when I was done voting.

    I vote for the individual and what I believe that they will do and whether I believe that they will stand against the particular issues I have with their respective parties.


    So, that said, here is what I've seen.

    The Democrats have essentially had the power for many years now. And, in that time, they have done very little to improve things. Consider that they like to blame the current economic issues on the Republicans. But, at the same time they have done nothing to prevent it.

    The Democrats have enjoyed the ability to push through many laws without any Republican assistance. And, yet they haven't done it. The reason... They don't want to risk having to take the blame.

    Consider that the last time I can remember people hurting this much economically, was when Clinton (a Democrat) was in office. I remember being in severe financial situations when Clinton was in office. I remember hundreds of thousands of jobs disappearing each week for nearly a year. Major companies shutting down, or laying off thousands of people. And, it just hit wave after wave after wave. And that was a Democrat in office.

    Consider that the situation we face now with the housing market was set up many years ago. And, guess what, the Democrats share the blame there as well.

    Consider that Clinton had intelligence on 9/11 prior to his leaving office. But, instead of getting his hands dirty, he rode out his remaining term in office trying to do as little as possible.

    Consider that Clinton is the very reason we are paying the high prices for gas. We had a clear path to further American oil fields and drilling. But, Clinton vetoed the legislation that was passed. He was the final word on drilling here. We had everything in line to start, and he shut it down.

    The stage we are on was set before Bush came into Office. But, the Democrats feel they can blame him for everything falling apart under his watch. But, they fail to admit that they had a rather large hand in setting up the failures.

    It's like if I'm at work, and I set up everything to blow 4 hours after I leave for the night. And, when it does, I blame the guy who was on shift when it happened.

    Now, I do have disagreements with Bush on many issues. But, I'm tired of hearing the Democrats holding him solely responsible for the current state of the country.

    The Democrats have had the power to act and to push their legislation through. They've had the ability to get things done. But, they won't. The housing situation could have been avoided if either party had cared to intervene. But, neither party acted. You can't blame only the Republicans for the housing situation.

    Same with the economic situation right now. The Democrats have had as much opportunity to prevent the current situation as the Republicans. You can't blame only the Republicans.

    Keep in mind that Bush is little more than a figure head right now. The Democrats really have been holding all the power. And, yet they blame him for the state of the economy.

    Sure, if he were a stronger President, it would help. But, the Democrats hold the power to block him, and they hold the power to get things done. But, they haven't gotten things done in the time they've held the power.

    Honestly, if they do take control of the Presidency, they will do as they've done before... They'll show what they are... We'll be where we've been... And, the next Election everyone will shift again to set up a Republican majority and a Republican President.

    There are many Democrats I like. But, historically speaking, I've seen the country get worse every time they've held majority power.

    You might think I am totally anti-Democrat from what I've said above. But, if you look at the majority of Ballots I've cast over the years, you'd see that is actually far from true.

    I vote on the individual, but will speak my observations of the past.

    You can watch this time as well. If Obama gets into Office, there will be a trend by the voters in the coming elections to replace seated Democrats with Republicans.

    People will see that without Republicans to blame, that the Democrats are more of the same. And, they've proven that every time they've held the power.

    In my mind, Republicans and Democrats are very similar once you get them in office. They have a core list of beliefs that the party adheres to. But, when you get them in office, essentially the same thing happens.

    Without the give and take and negotiating that happens in a two party system, things get too far out of whack and tip too far to one side.

    Right now, we've had a Democratic House and Congress that could act on their own. But, they've held out acting without Republicans because they want to be sure that they cannot be blamed. Kind of like saying.... "well, he did it too".

    Once they've got the Democrats holding all power in all branches, we'll see one of two things. Either they will tip the scale and start taking the country into an unbalanced direction - passing things with only their beliefs in mind. Or, they won't act at all if there is any potential controversy (so that they cannot be blamed for doing something).

    Essentially, they'll either go wild, or hide as much as they can until they have someone else to blame.
     
  10. macrumors 601

    Tilpots

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Location:
    Carolina Beach, NC
    #10
    I think that's a debate for another thread... If the Dems don't get the job done, in 2 yrs. we'll get a chance to vote again.
     
  11. thread starter macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #11
    There will be a big spot light on the Democrats the next 2 to 4 years. People want change but they want things to get done. If things don't change the way people want expect another revolt. The Dems will have all the power so they will get the praise or the blame. You can't blame the Republicans anymore because there aren't any.
     
  12. macrumors 601

    Tilpots

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Location:
    Carolina Beach, NC
    #12
    I agree wholeheartedly.
     
  13. macrumors 65816

    it5five

    Joined:
    May 31, 2006
    Location:
    New York
    #13
    A Democratic sweep? Well, they certainly couldn't do worse than the Republicans have done the last eight years.
     
  14. thread starter macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #14
    Not doing worse does not mean that they will automatically do better.
     
  15. macrumors 65816

    Cleverboy

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Location:
    Pocket Universe, nth Dimensional Complex Manifold
    #15
    Many of the new Democrats are very centrist/moderate. If they actually went to the "liberal" end, they'd face a revolt in their constituency. Don't believe the hype. The Democrats who beat out many of the Republican seats didn't do it because Republican territories suddeny went bi-polar. Along with Demographic changes, many of these Democrats are reaching to the center. I think people need to come back to reality and understand what's really happening with the Democratic party, and no read so much GOP propaganda.

    ~ CB
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    ktbubster

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Location:
    US
    #16
    "after the polls close today, the house, senate and presidency will be controlled by one party, with a man in charge who believes he is god.

    The last time this happened, 6 million jews died, and the atom bomb dropped"

    I am not conservative or liberal. I am independent, but an independent who'd rather teach a man to fish then give him some. Socialism and someone who hates israel, and half of america. Awesome.

    I would have hoped our first black president would have been someone who could make everyone proud.

    Flame away if you must, but the dems are going to go overboard, I'm sure of it, and in the long run, our country is going to suffer. period.

    god do we need some more parties.
     
  17. thread starter macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #17
    You have a lot of moderate Republicans that were voted out, right now it doesn't matter what your views of a person are the Republicans are seen as evil.
     
  18. macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago, IL, USA
    #18
    *bows and agrees*
     
  19. macrumors 65816

    it5five

    Joined:
    May 31, 2006
    Location:
    New York
    #19
    So you guys still have nothing but lies:

    1) Obama's not a socialist
    2) Obama has said before that the US would always be a friend of Israel

    But nice Hitler comparison you fit in there. You guys are worse than I thought.

    EDIT:

    Fixed for you Reps. You all had nothing wrong with one party control for the last eight years, and for you to start complaining now is 100% hypocritical.
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    ktbubster

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Location:
    US
    #20
    yeah, except for the fact that the financial ruin was caused by things before the bush reign. It was hugely influenced by a plethora of decisions made in the mid 90's under democrats. I'm not saying bush is great, and republicans know what is up, I was saying we need more parties and more ideals and things to get behind and... well, a much more even spread out train of thought.

    The world isn't black and white, this country shouldn't be forced into red and blue.

    You can't run a kitchen with all pastry chefs, or all sauce-aes (sorry have no idea how to spell that) you need some of everything.

    And ummm, I think you are forgetting that the Democrats have had the house and the senate for quite a while... so no, the republican party did not have complete control like the dems will.

    ::shakes head:: sigh

    PS. I agree with everything flyinmac said, even on my record and who i vote for... add in my comments about needing more parties so people aren't in teh situation to say "well i hate so and so, so it looks like i'm voting for choice B. don' tknow what he does, but i'll take that"

    It's going to be an interesting next few years.
     
  21. macrumors 68040

    KingYaba

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2005
    Location:
    Up the irons
    #21
    A sweep is not a good thing. It was not good when Republicans did, and it's not good thing tonight. Two years, fellas.
     
  22. macrumors 68000

    flyinmac

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Location:
    United States
    #22
    Exactly as I was saying.... But, now apparently McCain has conceded. And, apparently life is now going to get really interesting.

    So, here we go. Democrats all the way. Either we'll have a mess as they go through and push a solid Democratic agenda, or they'll do nothing because they won't have anyone to hide behind and blame.

    Democrats like to pretend that they had no hand in this mess. They like to cause a mess (or pretend one isn't coming), and then let the Republicans take the blame.

    Doesn't anyone remember why we voted for Bush the first time???? Remember it was a revolt against the Democrats. So, now we revolt against the Republicans and are surely only going to be reminded that the Democrats are just as bad.
     
  23. macrumors 603

    solvs

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    LaLaLand, CA
    #23
    At this point, most of us would be happy with not worse, because it's better than what we've had.

    Look, there's plenty of blame to go around, but there seems to be a lot of historical revisionism going on. Deregulation (bipartisan) caused this. Greed caused this. Mismanagement caused this. And as we've been over so many times already, if one wants to start with CRA, most of the home loans weren't under that guideline, so let's not go there either. Look, the GOP held Congress since '94. I don't know where you get the idea that it was a revolt against Dems. Were you even there? Maybe a revolt against Clenis' bj in '00, but it was fear in '04, and even then it was close. And the Dems barely had a lead in '06, discounting Liberman, they actually didn't have any lead in the Senate. Not to mention the Blue Dog (conservative) Dems. While I don't want to see another Carter admin, nor a Bush admin but in reverse in all the wrong ways, I doubt things are going to be as doom and gloom as some of you seem to think based on... what, to be honest I'm not quite sure. What was that quote about not belonging to an organized party, being a Democrat. They don't have the focus, nor the agendas, the GOP did. Even with their lead, I'm sure there will be infighting, and so little can be done in 2 years as you seem to think for some reason. It'll be adequate I'm sure. Plenty of conservative Dems and Repubs to cockblock things going too far. Plenty of moderates, not the far lefties some of you seem to think they are. If they screw up, we can all complain and vote them out in a couple of years. And they won't even call us unAmerican unpatriotic traitors if we do. :rolleyes:

    Nice Hitler reference BTW. Couldn't even make it to post #17 without the Godwinning. Classy.
     
  24. macrumors 68040

    KingYaba

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2005
    Location:
    Up the irons
    #24
    If only I had a nickle for every Bush & Hitler comparison over the last six years... though, those nickles are being taken away now. ;)
     
  25. macrumors 603

    solvs

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    LaLaLand, CA
    #25
    I'm not going to defend all of them, but come on, this would be stretching to Plastic Man. Dems having the WH, the House, and a slight lead in the Senate = Nazi Germany!?! :confused: Really? I mean, come on now. There's plenty to worry about, to legitimately criticize. There's no need to go there. Especially considering the obvious irony.

    And please don't start with the tax crap, unless you consider Reagan to be a socialist, because Obama is simply modeling part of his new plan after what Ronnie and Clenis did, and undoing the disastrous Bush tax cuts that are part of our current problems.
     

Share This Page