Y Does it Take 500 posts to Get an Avatar ???

Discussion in 'Site and Forum Feedback' started by Eager Beaver, Dec 26, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. macrumors 6502a

    Eager Beaver

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    #1
    That is an excessive amount of posts just for an avatar, C'Mon Man !!! :mad:
     
  2. macrumors 601

    Schtumple

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    Location:
    benkadams.com
  3. simsaladimbamba

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Location:
    located
    #3
    17 days to go for you.

    Anyway, it's a good way to have a reward for those sticking around and contributing to this board.

    They could be bigger though, but that is what the Demi/Contributor status is there for.
     
  4. RKO
    macrumors 6502

    RKO

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    #4
    "y"

    Y complain now as you are just about there @422 posts? :rolleyes:
     
  5. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
  6. macrumors 65816

    Yumunum

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Location:
    U.S.
    #6
    It's a valid question. Not a huge deal, but it's interesting.
     
  7. RKO
    macrumors 6502

    RKO

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
  8. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Location:
    /System/Library/CoreServices/
    #8
    I think its because it keeps out most of those who would make an inappropriate avatar. Or at least that's one of the reasons I think they do it.
     
  9. thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Eager Beaver

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    #9


    I think after 100 posts, they could rest assured it's not a spam account trying to promote something, or post inappropriete avatars -

    100 posts is some serious dedication to any website, and I find 500 incredibly excessive !!!

    It's a flippin avatar, some guys would rather just pay MR $20 bucks than be forced to post 500 times just for an avatar -

    @RKO, you are still 2 years away from qualifying for an avatar, so butt out pal!

    This "rule" needs to be re-evaluated IMO, and that's the reason for this thread -
     
  10. macrumors 68030

    Duff-Man

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Location:
    Albuquerque, NM
    #10
    Duff-Man says..is reading the FAQ or searching the forum *really* that difficult? Been there, done that. I still say that stuff that this should double the eligibility....oh yeah!
     
  11. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2011
    Location:
    the wire
    #11
    Rules are rules...Also, if 100 keeps out spam or what have you, then 500 will really keep out spam accounts. I'm ok with that.
     
  12. macrumors 6502a

    TheGenerous

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Location:
    I'm an Austronaut
    #12
    in your signature you could put a link to see your avatar :cool:
     
  13. macrumors 68030

    Darth.Titan

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #13
    500 posts for an avatar. That's the rule, and no amount of complaining is going to change it. It's a silly thing to get worked up over at any rate.

    Like it or lump it.
     
  14. macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Location:
    Denver Colorado
    #14
    I never thought it was that big of a deal. I still don't have one after all these years.
     
  15. macrumors demi-god

    Shrink

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Location:
    New England, USA
    #15
    All those folks above gave you reasons for 500 posts.

    But here is the truth - all of us who have avatars got them for only 10 posts. I hate to say it, but the Mods are making you have 500 posts because they don't like you.

    Sorry, I know the truth hurts - but I thought somebody should tell you the hard facts. :rolleyes: ;) :D

    Hang in, you'll get there. It felt, for me, like a fun landmark.:D
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    Angelo95210

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Location:
    Paris, France
    #16
    It's not a big deal. And I find you a bit rude to ask for one like that, you accepted the rules when you signed up.

    500 is for the regular users. This avatar picture is an easy way to recognize people we are used to discuss with. If everyone should have an avatar, this would no longer be the case.
     
  17. thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Eager Beaver

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2011
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    #17


    RKO is the perfect example -
    he has been posting here for 3 solid years and is clearly not a spammer
    But he only has 300 posts, so depriving him of an avatar in fear he might be a spammer is totally excessive.


    @Angelo95210 "It's not a big deal. And I find you a bit rude to ask for one like that"

    ru serious dude?
    you find me rude for asking this question in the "site and forum feedback"
    according to u, this forum should NOT be used, and any question posted is being rude?
    Nice job Angelo, do you know what the word "feedback" means? :eek:
     
  18. macrumors 68000

    EvanLugh

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2007
    Location:
    Developer land
    #18
    "depriving someone of an avatar".
    We need a 'first world problems' forum..
     
  19. rdowns, Dec 27, 2011
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2011

    macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #19
    I agree, 500 posts is too many to have to wait. There are tons of members who have been here for years and have no avatar. Avatars make reading the forums and identifying members much easier, IMO.


    Edit: Except for the ***** who change their avatars every other day. :D
     
  20. simsaladimbamba

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Location:
    located
    #20
    Maybe there should be similar rules like the Marketplace rules applied to the avatar, like 500 posts or one year of membership, whichever comes first, though there should be a minimum of 100 posts after one year membership to get an avatar. Or something like that.
     
  21. macrumors P6

    Weaselboy

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    #21
    This does seem to be a theme in the feedback forum. You asked a legit question and got a stream of smart remarks, but still no answer why it could not be 100 as opposed to 500 posts.

    Admittedly not a life altering issue, but a legit question none the less.
     
  22. macrumors 601

    Tilpots

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Location:
    Carolina Beach, NC
    #22
    If they change it to 100, why not 75, or even 50? :rolleyes:

    MR has gotten along well enough with the established avatar limit. If anything, the mods should make it a moving target for whiny posters. :D
     
  23. macrumors P6

    dukebound85

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Location:
    5045 feet above sea level
    #23
    I think it's fine as is personally. There are only a few dozen who post enough that I recognize avatars.beyond that, they kind of clunk up the forum

    ----------

    Lol I bet seeing you are just over 100:p
     
  24. macrumors 68030

    ericrwalker

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    #24
    I have no problem with having members earning their avatars.......Anymore.:D
     
  25. macrumors 68000

    rocknblogger

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Location:
    New Jersey
    #25
    I'm almost there so it doesn't matter too much for me and I've seen rules similar in other forums but usually the number of posts was 100 or less.

    Honestly I think once you reach 200 or 300 it's pretty obvious you're here to stay but hey, it is what it is.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page