Zuckerberg will be richer then Ballmer

Discussion in 'Apple, Inc and Tech Industry' started by smoledman, May 3, 2012.

  1. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    #1
  2. macrumors 68000

    \-V-/

    Joined:
    May 3, 2012
    #2
    Yeah... we're the same age. He makes me feel incredibly poor. :p
     
  3. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    #3
    As much as I don't really like Facebook I can confidently say that Zuckerberg has contributed a lot more to the world than Ballmer.
     
  4. thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    #4
    Well Ballmer was never a software engineer or UX designer, that's not surprising. Honestly I don't know why or how Ballmer got into position to be CEO. He failed miserably as director of Windows group in the 1980s to deliver a working version. Bill Gates is known as intensely loyal to his Harvard buddies.
     
  5. Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #5
    No offense but who cares. His level of wealth impacts me in no way and while I applaud both individuals in reaching the pinnacle in their respective industries but does it really matter if one is richer then the other?
     
  6. macrumors G3

    roadbloc

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    #6
    This. No doubt Facebook will eventually become the next MySpace as something else rolls into fashion. We may be a few years away from it, but I'm certain that Zuckerberg's wealth will be due to a fashion craze, not because he sells useful software.
     
  7. macrumors Penryn

    Abstract

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Location:
    Location Location
    #7
    Ok, but Zuckerberg deserves to be richer than Ballmer. I don't care if he "only" made a social network.


    And I doubt FaceBook is going anywhere. It'll be around for awhile. It's too interwoven into society now to fade so easily. This is NOT MySpace. This is NOT Friendster. This is global. Truly global. I had friends on all sorts of different social networks before, but now every one of them are on FaceBook. Even if it becomes unpopular in some countries, it's not going to simply disappear from the consciousness of the people in all of them. I'm unlikely to stop using it, as long as my friends are still on it.

    If Google+ didn't make a dent despite being quite good, FaceBook seems very safe for 5-10 years.
     
  8. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    May 29, 2011
    Location:
    Michigan
    #8
  9. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2011
    #9
    People that think Facebook is a myspace trend amuse me.

    I would bet a hefty sum of money that 10 years from now Facebook will be just as popular as it is today, if not much more so.
     
  10. thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    #10
    I hardly use my FB account, I don't get the big deal about it. Twitter is more useful to me.
     
  11. macrumors 68020

    sviato

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2010
    Location:
    HR 9038 A
    #11
    I think Zuckerberg will be wealthier than a large fraction of people in the entire world :p
     
  12. Reach9, May 5, 2012
    Last edited: May 5, 2012

    macrumors 68020

    Reach9

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Location:
    In America
    #12
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1361855

    Facebook valued at 95B? give me a break. Facebook isn't Google, just like all the other social media stocks (except LinkedIn because of it's niche corporate independence), I think we'll see Facebook decline, I give Facebook sometime between 3 to 5 years. Facebook cannot sustain enough growth to certify this valuation.

    Facebook's users might continue to grow, but since they are not customers, it won't matter to Facebook. The company's actual customers are advertisers, and some are not seeing enough of an ROI, and more and more are jumping ship. Let's not get started with the privacy issues..
     
  13. thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    #13
    What is FB's revenue generation plan?
     
  14. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    May 29, 2011
    Location:
    Michigan
    #14
    Good point. Meant all but a fraction, but you get the idea.

    To OP: FB can sit well enough on ad revenue at the very least since they dominate the internet. I also believe they get a cut of game micro-transactions. That suited Google for plenty until it grew to have other sources of revenue.
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    Reach9

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2010
    Location:
    In America
    #15
    Advertisements, they're the main source of revenue. 12% of Facebook's revenue came from Zynga, and now that Zynga has their own website..that might be a potential issue as well.

    Also, majority of the people are on mobile, and they don't have ads for Facebook mobile..yet. So that's another concern.

    Another point, Facebook has over 900M registered users apparently (don't know if it's actually 900M individuals).. there's going to be a point where not that many people are going to be on Facebook to make any difference to advertisers if there isn't a justified ROI. Think about it.. how many people actually click on Facebook ads?

    I have no doubt that Facebook will grow in user base, but at the end of the day, it's a company and revenue is what matters.
     
  16. thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    #16
    Zuck getting $90 billion cash for what?
     

Share This Page