“I Was the WikiLeaks Contact for DNC Emails – Not Russia”

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by DearthnVader, Dec 16, 2016.

  1. DearthnVader macrumors 6502

    DearthnVader

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Location:
    Red Springs, NC
    #1
    Hmm.....I don't know what would possess anyone to claim this, if it is not true....





     
  2. steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
  3. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #3
    you have pretty good deflectors steve, but they don't work.

    saw that earlier, wonder if the DNC is on the hunt for the defector and if they are, what will they do to him/her once found?
     
  4. DrewDaHilp1 macrumors 6502a

    DrewDaHilp1

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    All Your Memes Are Belong to US
    #4
    [​IMG]
    "Robbed" aka shot in the back and nothing taken.
     
  5. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #5
    https://consortiumnews.com/2016/12/15/making-russia-the-enemy/

    "
    And, even though The New York Times and other big news outlets are reporting as flat fact that Russia hacked the Democratic email accounts and gave the information to WikiLeaks, former British Ambassador Craig Murray, a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, told the London Daily Mail that he personally received the email data from a “disgusted” Democrat.

    Murray said he flew from London to Washington for a clandestine handoff from one of the email sources in September, receiving the package in a wooded area near American University.

    [​IMG]
    Former British Ambassador Craig Murray

    “Neither of [the leaks, from the Democratic National Committee or Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta] came from the Russians,” Murray said, adding: “the source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”

    Murray said the insider felt “disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.” Murray added that his meeting was with an intermediary for the Democratic leaker, not the leaker directly."


    They're doing this because the intelligence agencies and the neocons are taking advantage of all the BS the Clinton campaign put out there about Russia to continue a narrative in the pursuit of defense spending for a new cold war.
     
  6. DearthnVader thread starter macrumors 6502

    DearthnVader

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Location:
    Red Springs, NC
    #6
    If you watch the video, you'll see what may have happened to one of the key leakers.
    --- Post Merged, Dec 16, 2016 ---
    Yes, Hillary, dear, you want to hookup later?
     
  7. steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #7
    your deflectors make the uss enterprise's look like toys. and come on now the daily mail??? is that your new source of facts?
     
  8. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #8
    It is amazing how quickly and easily humans believe some things when it fits their narrative.

    It's not a liberal or a conservative trait.

    It's a human one. So you are in good company.
     
  9. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #9
    I love Star trek, thumbs up for that.
    now be kind enough to quote where I posted a daily mail link.
     
  10. steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #10
    is this not a story from the daily mail? a source people here have condemned often?
     
  11. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #11
    Well, the daily mail IS in the video, and IS running the story.

    However, they are doing an incredibly sloppy job. I've already posted about Murray, and the Mail didn't bother to get the facts as HE laid them out. They claim Murray was the leaker, that's ****ing nonsense:
    https://consortiumnews.com/2016/12/15/making-russia-the-enemy/
    "
    And, even though The New York Times and other big news outlets are reporting as flat fact that Russia hacked the Democratic email accounts and gave the information to WikiLeaks, former British Ambassador Craig Murray, a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, told the London Daily Mail that he personally received the email data from a “disgusted” Democrat.

    Murray said he flew from London to Washington for a clandestine handoff from one of the email sources in September, receiving the package in a wooded area near American University.

    [​IMG]
    Former British Ambassador Craig Murray

    “Neither of [the leaks, from the Democratic National Committee or Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta] came from the Russians,” Murray said, adding: “the source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”

    Murray said the insider felt “disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.” Murray added that his meeting was with an intermediary for the Democratic leaker, not the leaker directly.

    If Murray’s story is true, it raises several alternative scenarios: that the U.S. intelligence community’s claims about a Russian hack are false; that Russians hacked the Democrats’ emails for their own intelligence gathering without giving the material to WikiLeaks; or that Murray was deceived about the identity of the original leaker."


    SPECIFICALLY say's he's not the leaker, but facilitated the exchange of documents.
    --- Post Merged, Dec 16, 2016 ---
    Post #11 has the actual story in the words of Murray. Daily Mail was too lazy to even get the phrasing right. They claim HE was the leaker, when Murray himself said he was facilitating the exchange of the documents, not the leaker himself.
     
  12. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #12
    look at post 5, that story is in a few places. looks like there are a few PATRIOTS who are democrats & took one for the U.S.
     
  13. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
  14. Raid macrumors 68020

    Raid

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Location:
    Toronto
    #14
    I thought that was the smell of a shredder motor burning out.
     
  15. DrewDaHilp1 macrumors 6502a

    DrewDaHilp1

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    All Your Memes Are Belong to US
    #15
    Bleach Bit™ doesn't leave behind a smell.
     
  16. ibookg409 Suspended

    ibookg409

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Location:
    Portsmouth, NH
    #16
    If they don't work can you say that they are pretty good?
     
  17. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #17
    because they are always on :p
     
  18. appleisking macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 24, 2013
    #18
    Makes a hell of a lot more sense than the Russians doing it......
     
  19. satcomer macrumors 603

    satcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Location:
    The Finger Lakes Region
  20. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #20
    it proves democrats want to stay in power no matter who dies or if we end up at war.
     
  21. Zombie Acorn macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #21
    Would the democrats look hypocritical to ask for evidence that this occurred? would they apologize to The Russians (tm) if it were found to be true?
     
  22. Rogifan Suspended

    Rogifan

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
  23. Eraserhead, Dec 16, 2016
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2016

    Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #23
    Don't think it's likely. Why not talk to the Guardian or Telegraph?

    And why would anyone in their right mind leak to someone who was likely being followed by UK and US intelligence?

    Also when the opposition is Trump? Really?
    --- Post Merged, Dec 16, 2016 ---
    Apart from the red flags, yes.
     
  24. Jess13 Suspended

    Jess13

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    #24

    Hillary ’Too Stupid To Indict’ Clinton: “What, like with a cloth?!”

    HC.jpg

     
  25. Desertrat macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2003
    Location:
    Terlingua, Texas
    #25

Share This Page